Cargando…

Dosimetry comparison between a 3D printed minimally invasive guidance template and free implantation in the brachytherapy treatment of postoperative recurrent cervical carcinoma

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the dosimetry difference between a 3D printed minimally invasive guidance template and conventional free implantation in brachytherapy of postoperative recurrent cervical carcinoma under the guidance of computed tomography (CT). Methods: A total of 21 cases...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yuan, Xiangkun, Zhang, Yongxia, Cui, Mangmang, Miao, Junjun, Gao, Lei, Hu, Jianwei, Tian, Dandan, You, Jinqiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6551446/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31213915
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S195829
_version_ 1783424390341328896
author Yuan, Xiangkun
Zhang, Yongxia
Cui, Mangmang
Miao, Junjun
Gao, Lei
Hu, Jianwei
Tian, Dandan
You, Jinqiang
author_facet Yuan, Xiangkun
Zhang, Yongxia
Cui, Mangmang
Miao, Junjun
Gao, Lei
Hu, Jianwei
Tian, Dandan
You, Jinqiang
author_sort Yuan, Xiangkun
collection PubMed
description Objective: This study aimed to investigate the dosimetry difference between a 3D printed minimally invasive guidance template and conventional free implantation in brachytherapy of postoperative recurrent cervical carcinoma under the guidance of computed tomography (CT). Methods: A total of 21 cases of patients with recurrent cervical cancer after operation were enrolled from January 2017 to June 2018. After external irradiation treatment in 1.8-Gy fractions to 45 Gy, patients were randomly divided into two groups to receive brachytherapy: 11 cases were assisted by a 3D-printed minimally invasive guidance template, and the other 10 cases were free implantation. In the template group, needles were inserted according to the main guide channel of the template commissioned in medical photosensitive resin, while patients in the other group were treated with bare hands under the guidance of CT, which was used in both groups to adjust the position and depth of the implant needles. After transmission of the CT images into the Oncentra® Brachy TPS system, the target organs and organs at risk were delineated for further treatment. Results: The D(90) value of the high-risk clinical target volume in the template group was 6.30±0.21 Gy while that in the other group was 6.07±0.32 Gy (P<0.05). In addition, the D2cm(3 )(illuminated dose of 2 cm(3 )of organ at risk) value of the bladder, rectum, sigmoid colon, and bowel was significantly decreased in the template group as compared to the free group (P<0.05). The number of needles used for each treatment in the template group was 5.71±1.82, while that for the free injection group was 7.78±2.35 (P<0.05). Conclusion: Compared with conventional free implantation, the 3D printed minimally invasive guidance template-assisted treatment has an obvious dosimetry advantage in the treatment of postoperative recurrent cervical carcinoma, with shorter time of implantation and better repeatability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6551446
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65514462019-06-18 Dosimetry comparison between a 3D printed minimally invasive guidance template and free implantation in the brachytherapy treatment of postoperative recurrent cervical carcinoma Yuan, Xiangkun Zhang, Yongxia Cui, Mangmang Miao, Junjun Gao, Lei Hu, Jianwei Tian, Dandan You, Jinqiang Cancer Manag Res Original Research Objective: This study aimed to investigate the dosimetry difference between a 3D printed minimally invasive guidance template and conventional free implantation in brachytherapy of postoperative recurrent cervical carcinoma under the guidance of computed tomography (CT). Methods: A total of 21 cases of patients with recurrent cervical cancer after operation were enrolled from January 2017 to June 2018. After external irradiation treatment in 1.8-Gy fractions to 45 Gy, patients were randomly divided into two groups to receive brachytherapy: 11 cases were assisted by a 3D-printed minimally invasive guidance template, and the other 10 cases were free implantation. In the template group, needles were inserted according to the main guide channel of the template commissioned in medical photosensitive resin, while patients in the other group were treated with bare hands under the guidance of CT, which was used in both groups to adjust the position and depth of the implant needles. After transmission of the CT images into the Oncentra® Brachy TPS system, the target organs and organs at risk were delineated for further treatment. Results: The D(90) value of the high-risk clinical target volume in the template group was 6.30±0.21 Gy while that in the other group was 6.07±0.32 Gy (P<0.05). In addition, the D2cm(3 )(illuminated dose of 2 cm(3 )of organ at risk) value of the bladder, rectum, sigmoid colon, and bowel was significantly decreased in the template group as compared to the free group (P<0.05). The number of needles used for each treatment in the template group was 5.71±1.82, while that for the free injection group was 7.78±2.35 (P<0.05). Conclusion: Compared with conventional free implantation, the 3D printed minimally invasive guidance template-assisted treatment has an obvious dosimetry advantage in the treatment of postoperative recurrent cervical carcinoma, with shorter time of implantation and better repeatability. Dove 2019-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6551446/ /pubmed/31213915 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S195829 Text en © 2019 Yuan et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Yuan, Xiangkun
Zhang, Yongxia
Cui, Mangmang
Miao, Junjun
Gao, Lei
Hu, Jianwei
Tian, Dandan
You, Jinqiang
Dosimetry comparison between a 3D printed minimally invasive guidance template and free implantation in the brachytherapy treatment of postoperative recurrent cervical carcinoma
title Dosimetry comparison between a 3D printed minimally invasive guidance template and free implantation in the brachytherapy treatment of postoperative recurrent cervical carcinoma
title_full Dosimetry comparison between a 3D printed minimally invasive guidance template and free implantation in the brachytherapy treatment of postoperative recurrent cervical carcinoma
title_fullStr Dosimetry comparison between a 3D printed minimally invasive guidance template and free implantation in the brachytherapy treatment of postoperative recurrent cervical carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Dosimetry comparison between a 3D printed minimally invasive guidance template and free implantation in the brachytherapy treatment of postoperative recurrent cervical carcinoma
title_short Dosimetry comparison between a 3D printed minimally invasive guidance template and free implantation in the brachytherapy treatment of postoperative recurrent cervical carcinoma
title_sort dosimetry comparison between a 3d printed minimally invasive guidance template and free implantation in the brachytherapy treatment of postoperative recurrent cervical carcinoma
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6551446/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31213915
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S195829
work_keys_str_mv AT yuanxiangkun dosimetrycomparisonbetweena3dprintedminimallyinvasiveguidancetemplateandfreeimplantationinthebrachytherapytreatmentofpostoperativerecurrentcervicalcarcinoma
AT zhangyongxia dosimetrycomparisonbetweena3dprintedminimallyinvasiveguidancetemplateandfreeimplantationinthebrachytherapytreatmentofpostoperativerecurrentcervicalcarcinoma
AT cuimangmang dosimetrycomparisonbetweena3dprintedminimallyinvasiveguidancetemplateandfreeimplantationinthebrachytherapytreatmentofpostoperativerecurrentcervicalcarcinoma
AT miaojunjun dosimetrycomparisonbetweena3dprintedminimallyinvasiveguidancetemplateandfreeimplantationinthebrachytherapytreatmentofpostoperativerecurrentcervicalcarcinoma
AT gaolei dosimetrycomparisonbetweena3dprintedminimallyinvasiveguidancetemplateandfreeimplantationinthebrachytherapytreatmentofpostoperativerecurrentcervicalcarcinoma
AT hujianwei dosimetrycomparisonbetweena3dprintedminimallyinvasiveguidancetemplateandfreeimplantationinthebrachytherapytreatmentofpostoperativerecurrentcervicalcarcinoma
AT tiandandan dosimetrycomparisonbetweena3dprintedminimallyinvasiveguidancetemplateandfreeimplantationinthebrachytherapytreatmentofpostoperativerecurrentcervicalcarcinoma
AT youjinqiang dosimetrycomparisonbetweena3dprintedminimallyinvasiveguidancetemplateandfreeimplantationinthebrachytherapytreatmentofpostoperativerecurrentcervicalcarcinoma