Cargando…

Good Practice for Conference Abstracts and Presentations: GPCAP

Research that has been sponsored by pharmaceutical, medical device and biotechnology companies is often presented at scientific and medical conferences. However, practices vary between organizations and it can be difficult to follow both individual conference requirements and good publication practi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Foster, Cate, Wager, Elizabeth, Marchington, Jackie, Patel, Mina, Banner, Steve, Kennard, Nina C., Panayi, Antonia, Stacey, Rianne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6551883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31183163
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41073-019-0070-x
_version_ 1783424476330852352
author Foster, Cate
Wager, Elizabeth
Marchington, Jackie
Patel, Mina
Banner, Steve
Kennard, Nina C.
Panayi, Antonia
Stacey, Rianne
author_facet Foster, Cate
Wager, Elizabeth
Marchington, Jackie
Patel, Mina
Banner, Steve
Kennard, Nina C.
Panayi, Antonia
Stacey, Rianne
author_sort Foster, Cate
collection PubMed
description Research that has been sponsored by pharmaceutical, medical device and biotechnology companies is often presented at scientific and medical conferences. However, practices vary between organizations and it can be difficult to follow both individual conference requirements and good publication practice guidelines. Until now, no specific guidelines or recommendations have been available to describe best practice for conference presentations. This document was developed by a working group of publication professionals and uploaded to PeerJ Preprints for consultation prior to publication; an additional 67 medical societies, medical conference sites and conference companies were also asked to comment. The resulting recommendations aim to complement current good publication practice and authorship guidelines, outline the general principles of best practice for conference presentations and provide recommendations around authorship, contributorship, financial transparency, prior publication and copyright, to conference organizers, authors and industry professionals. While the authors of this document recognize that individual conference guidelines should be respected, they urge organizers to consider authorship criteria and data transparency when designing submission sites and setting parameters around word/character count and content for abstracts. It is also important to recognize that conference presentations have different limitations to full journal publications, for example, in the case of limited audiences that necessitate refocused abstracts, or where lead authors do not speak the local language, and these have been acknowledged accordingly. The authors also recognize the need for further clarity regarding copyright of previously published abstracts and have made recommendations to assist with best practice. By following Good Practice for Conference Abstracts and Presentations: GPCAP recommendations, industry professionals, authors and conference organizers will improve consistency, transparency and integrity of publications submitted to conferences worldwide.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6551883
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65518832019-06-10 Good Practice for Conference Abstracts and Presentations: GPCAP Foster, Cate Wager, Elizabeth Marchington, Jackie Patel, Mina Banner, Steve Kennard, Nina C. Panayi, Antonia Stacey, Rianne Res Integr Peer Rev Research Research that has been sponsored by pharmaceutical, medical device and biotechnology companies is often presented at scientific and medical conferences. However, practices vary between organizations and it can be difficult to follow both individual conference requirements and good publication practice guidelines. Until now, no specific guidelines or recommendations have been available to describe best practice for conference presentations. This document was developed by a working group of publication professionals and uploaded to PeerJ Preprints for consultation prior to publication; an additional 67 medical societies, medical conference sites and conference companies were also asked to comment. The resulting recommendations aim to complement current good publication practice and authorship guidelines, outline the general principles of best practice for conference presentations and provide recommendations around authorship, contributorship, financial transparency, prior publication and copyright, to conference organizers, authors and industry professionals. While the authors of this document recognize that individual conference guidelines should be respected, they urge organizers to consider authorship criteria and data transparency when designing submission sites and setting parameters around word/character count and content for abstracts. It is also important to recognize that conference presentations have different limitations to full journal publications, for example, in the case of limited audiences that necessitate refocused abstracts, or where lead authors do not speak the local language, and these have been acknowledged accordingly. The authors also recognize the need for further clarity regarding copyright of previously published abstracts and have made recommendations to assist with best practice. By following Good Practice for Conference Abstracts and Presentations: GPCAP recommendations, industry professionals, authors and conference organizers will improve consistency, transparency and integrity of publications submitted to conferences worldwide. BioMed Central 2019-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6551883/ /pubmed/31183163 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41073-019-0070-x Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Foster, Cate
Wager, Elizabeth
Marchington, Jackie
Patel, Mina
Banner, Steve
Kennard, Nina C.
Panayi, Antonia
Stacey, Rianne
Good Practice for Conference Abstracts and Presentations: GPCAP
title Good Practice for Conference Abstracts and Presentations: GPCAP
title_full Good Practice for Conference Abstracts and Presentations: GPCAP
title_fullStr Good Practice for Conference Abstracts and Presentations: GPCAP
title_full_unstemmed Good Practice for Conference Abstracts and Presentations: GPCAP
title_short Good Practice for Conference Abstracts and Presentations: GPCAP
title_sort good practice for conference abstracts and presentations: gpcap
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6551883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31183163
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41073-019-0070-x
work_keys_str_mv AT fostercate goodpracticeforconferenceabstractsandpresentationsgpcap
AT wagerelizabeth goodpracticeforconferenceabstractsandpresentationsgpcap
AT marchingtonjackie goodpracticeforconferenceabstractsandpresentationsgpcap
AT patelmina goodpracticeforconferenceabstractsandpresentationsgpcap
AT bannersteve goodpracticeforconferenceabstractsandpresentationsgpcap
AT kennardninac goodpracticeforconferenceabstractsandpresentationsgpcap
AT panayiantonia goodpracticeforconferenceabstractsandpresentationsgpcap
AT staceyrianne goodpracticeforconferenceabstractsandpresentationsgpcap
AT goodpracticeforconferenceabstractsandpresentationsgpcap