Cargando…

SAT-443 Osilodrostat Has No Clinically Relevant Effect on the Pharmacokinetic (PK) Profile of a Monophasic Oral Contraceptive in Healthy Females Receiving Cortisol Replacement Therapy

Background: Osilodrostat, a potent oral 11β-hydroxylase inhibitor, is in Phase 3 development for endogenous Cushing’s syndrome (CS). As CS occurs mostly in females of childbearing age, it is important to determine the effect of osilodrostat on oral contraceptives (OCs). We report the effect of multi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Breitschaft, Astrid, Tauchmanova, Libuse, Han, Kevin, Atkinson, Susan, Nauwelaerts, Heidi, Sengupta, Tirtha, Zic, Ivanka, Burgmeyer, Lisa, Pedroncelli, Alberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Endocrine Society 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6552051/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/js.2019-SAT-443
_version_ 1783424512900988928
author Breitschaft, Astrid
Tauchmanova, Libuse
Han, Kevin
Atkinson, Susan
Nauwelaerts, Heidi
Sengupta, Tirtha
Zic, Ivanka
Burgmeyer, Lisa
Pedroncelli, Alberto
author_facet Breitschaft, Astrid
Tauchmanova, Libuse
Han, Kevin
Atkinson, Susan
Nauwelaerts, Heidi
Sengupta, Tirtha
Zic, Ivanka
Burgmeyer, Lisa
Pedroncelli, Alberto
author_sort Breitschaft, Astrid
collection PubMed
description Background: Osilodrostat, a potent oral 11β-hydroxylase inhibitor, is in Phase 3 development for endogenous Cushing’s syndrome (CS). As CS occurs mostly in females of childbearing age, it is important to determine the effect of osilodrostat on oral contraceptives (OCs). We report the effect of multiple osilodrostat doses on the PK profile of a single OC dose in healthy females on cortisol replacement. Methods: This Phase 1, single-center, open-label, three-period, drug-drug interaction study enrolled healthy, non-smoking females aged 18-50 y with regular menstrual cycles. A single OC dose, containing ethinyl estradiol (EES) 30 μg and levonorgestrel (LVG) 150 μg, was given on day (D) 1 of treatment period 1 (TP1; D1-7). In TP2 (D8-19), osilodrostat 30 mg twice daily was given with hydrocortisone 20 mg daily; a second OC dose was given on D15. Hydrocortisone was tapered/discontinued during TP3 (D20-28). Primary variable: AUC(last) (area under curve from time 0 to last measurable concentration) and C(max) (peak plasma concentration) of EES and LVG, calculated from a 120h OC PK profile on D1 and D15. Secondary endpoints: osilodrostat PK; safety/tolerability of OC and osilodrostat co-administration. Results: 24 subjects were enrolled (mean ± SD age, 37 ± 7 years; Caucasian, 96%). EES and LVG AUC(last) were similar when OC was given with osilodrostat (n=19) vs alone (n=24) [geometric mean: EES, 541 vs 537 pg∙h/mL; LVG, 44900 vs 42300 pg∙h/mL]. Insignificant decreases in C(max) were seen for OC with osilodrostat vs alone (geometric mean: EES, 51.6 vs 59.8 pg/mL; LVG, 3360 vs 3800 pg/mL). Apparent total clearance, t(½) (half-life) and t(max) (time to C(max)) were similar with and without osilodrostat for EES and LVG, except for a small increase in t(½) of LVG with osilodrostat (26.4 vs 22.9 h). For osilodrostat PK (n=19), geometric means for AUC(τ) (AUC to end of dosing period at steady state) and C(max), and median t(max), were 1620 ng∙h/mL, 299 ng/mL, and 1.0 h, respectively. Most (92%) subjects received both OC doses; 83% completed osilodrostat treatment. At the end of TP3 (2 days after last hydrocortisone dose), 79% of subjects had ACTH-stimulated serum cortisol below the protocol-defined threshold, although all had normal unstimulated levels at study end; these results may be related to high osilodrostat doses, hydrocortisone supplementation, timing of first stimulation test after last hydrocortisone dose or another factor. Other common AEs: nausea (46%), headache and nasopharyngitis (both 38%). Four (17%) subjects discontinued due to: palpitations, n=1; throat tightness, n=1; asthenia and exhaustion, n=1; positive pregnancy test, n=1 (not confirmed by ultrasound). Conclusion: Concomitant treatment of osilodrostat (highest dose used in Phase 3 trials) with a single OC dose did not result in clinically relevant changes in OC PK parameters, suggesting that OC can be given with osilodrostat and provide adequate contraception.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6552051
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Endocrine Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65520512019-06-13 SAT-443 Osilodrostat Has No Clinically Relevant Effect on the Pharmacokinetic (PK) Profile of a Monophasic Oral Contraceptive in Healthy Females Receiving Cortisol Replacement Therapy Breitschaft, Astrid Tauchmanova, Libuse Han, Kevin Atkinson, Susan Nauwelaerts, Heidi Sengupta, Tirtha Zic, Ivanka Burgmeyer, Lisa Pedroncelli, Alberto J Endocr Soc Neuroendocrinology and Pituitary Background: Osilodrostat, a potent oral 11β-hydroxylase inhibitor, is in Phase 3 development for endogenous Cushing’s syndrome (CS). As CS occurs mostly in females of childbearing age, it is important to determine the effect of osilodrostat on oral contraceptives (OCs). We report the effect of multiple osilodrostat doses on the PK profile of a single OC dose in healthy females on cortisol replacement. Methods: This Phase 1, single-center, open-label, three-period, drug-drug interaction study enrolled healthy, non-smoking females aged 18-50 y with regular menstrual cycles. A single OC dose, containing ethinyl estradiol (EES) 30 μg and levonorgestrel (LVG) 150 μg, was given on day (D) 1 of treatment period 1 (TP1; D1-7). In TP2 (D8-19), osilodrostat 30 mg twice daily was given with hydrocortisone 20 mg daily; a second OC dose was given on D15. Hydrocortisone was tapered/discontinued during TP3 (D20-28). Primary variable: AUC(last) (area under curve from time 0 to last measurable concentration) and C(max) (peak plasma concentration) of EES and LVG, calculated from a 120h OC PK profile on D1 and D15. Secondary endpoints: osilodrostat PK; safety/tolerability of OC and osilodrostat co-administration. Results: 24 subjects were enrolled (mean ± SD age, 37 ± 7 years; Caucasian, 96%). EES and LVG AUC(last) were similar when OC was given with osilodrostat (n=19) vs alone (n=24) [geometric mean: EES, 541 vs 537 pg∙h/mL; LVG, 44900 vs 42300 pg∙h/mL]. Insignificant decreases in C(max) were seen for OC with osilodrostat vs alone (geometric mean: EES, 51.6 vs 59.8 pg/mL; LVG, 3360 vs 3800 pg/mL). Apparent total clearance, t(½) (half-life) and t(max) (time to C(max)) were similar with and without osilodrostat for EES and LVG, except for a small increase in t(½) of LVG with osilodrostat (26.4 vs 22.9 h). For osilodrostat PK (n=19), geometric means for AUC(τ) (AUC to end of dosing period at steady state) and C(max), and median t(max), were 1620 ng∙h/mL, 299 ng/mL, and 1.0 h, respectively. Most (92%) subjects received both OC doses; 83% completed osilodrostat treatment. At the end of TP3 (2 days after last hydrocortisone dose), 79% of subjects had ACTH-stimulated serum cortisol below the protocol-defined threshold, although all had normal unstimulated levels at study end; these results may be related to high osilodrostat doses, hydrocortisone supplementation, timing of first stimulation test after last hydrocortisone dose or another factor. Other common AEs: nausea (46%), headache and nasopharyngitis (both 38%). Four (17%) subjects discontinued due to: palpitations, n=1; throat tightness, n=1; asthenia and exhaustion, n=1; positive pregnancy test, n=1 (not confirmed by ultrasound). Conclusion: Concomitant treatment of osilodrostat (highest dose used in Phase 3 trials) with a single OC dose did not result in clinically relevant changes in OC PK parameters, suggesting that OC can be given with osilodrostat and provide adequate contraception. Endocrine Society 2019-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6552051/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/js.2019-SAT-443 Text en Copyright © 2019 Endocrine Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article has been published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial, No-Derivatives License (CC BY-NC-ND; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Neuroendocrinology and Pituitary
Breitschaft, Astrid
Tauchmanova, Libuse
Han, Kevin
Atkinson, Susan
Nauwelaerts, Heidi
Sengupta, Tirtha
Zic, Ivanka
Burgmeyer, Lisa
Pedroncelli, Alberto
SAT-443 Osilodrostat Has No Clinically Relevant Effect on the Pharmacokinetic (PK) Profile of a Monophasic Oral Contraceptive in Healthy Females Receiving Cortisol Replacement Therapy
title SAT-443 Osilodrostat Has No Clinically Relevant Effect on the Pharmacokinetic (PK) Profile of a Monophasic Oral Contraceptive in Healthy Females Receiving Cortisol Replacement Therapy
title_full SAT-443 Osilodrostat Has No Clinically Relevant Effect on the Pharmacokinetic (PK) Profile of a Monophasic Oral Contraceptive in Healthy Females Receiving Cortisol Replacement Therapy
title_fullStr SAT-443 Osilodrostat Has No Clinically Relevant Effect on the Pharmacokinetic (PK) Profile of a Monophasic Oral Contraceptive in Healthy Females Receiving Cortisol Replacement Therapy
title_full_unstemmed SAT-443 Osilodrostat Has No Clinically Relevant Effect on the Pharmacokinetic (PK) Profile of a Monophasic Oral Contraceptive in Healthy Females Receiving Cortisol Replacement Therapy
title_short SAT-443 Osilodrostat Has No Clinically Relevant Effect on the Pharmacokinetic (PK) Profile of a Monophasic Oral Contraceptive in Healthy Females Receiving Cortisol Replacement Therapy
title_sort sat-443 osilodrostat has no clinically relevant effect on the pharmacokinetic (pk) profile of a monophasic oral contraceptive in healthy females receiving cortisol replacement therapy
topic Neuroendocrinology and Pituitary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6552051/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/js.2019-SAT-443
work_keys_str_mv AT breitschaftastrid sat443osilodrostathasnoclinicallyrelevanteffectonthepharmacokineticpkprofileofamonophasicoralcontraceptiveinhealthyfemalesreceivingcortisolreplacementtherapy
AT tauchmanovalibuse sat443osilodrostathasnoclinicallyrelevanteffectonthepharmacokineticpkprofileofamonophasicoralcontraceptiveinhealthyfemalesreceivingcortisolreplacementtherapy
AT hankevin sat443osilodrostathasnoclinicallyrelevanteffectonthepharmacokineticpkprofileofamonophasicoralcontraceptiveinhealthyfemalesreceivingcortisolreplacementtherapy
AT atkinsonsusan sat443osilodrostathasnoclinicallyrelevanteffectonthepharmacokineticpkprofileofamonophasicoralcontraceptiveinhealthyfemalesreceivingcortisolreplacementtherapy
AT nauwelaertsheidi sat443osilodrostathasnoclinicallyrelevanteffectonthepharmacokineticpkprofileofamonophasicoralcontraceptiveinhealthyfemalesreceivingcortisolreplacementtherapy
AT senguptatirtha sat443osilodrostathasnoclinicallyrelevanteffectonthepharmacokineticpkprofileofamonophasicoralcontraceptiveinhealthyfemalesreceivingcortisolreplacementtherapy
AT zicivanka sat443osilodrostathasnoclinicallyrelevanteffectonthepharmacokineticpkprofileofamonophasicoralcontraceptiveinhealthyfemalesreceivingcortisolreplacementtherapy
AT burgmeyerlisa sat443osilodrostathasnoclinicallyrelevanteffectonthepharmacokineticpkprofileofamonophasicoralcontraceptiveinhealthyfemalesreceivingcortisolreplacementtherapy
AT pedroncellialberto sat443osilodrostathasnoclinicallyrelevanteffectonthepharmacokineticpkprofileofamonophasicoralcontraceptiveinhealthyfemalesreceivingcortisolreplacementtherapy