Cargando…

Setup Error Assessment and Correction in Planar kV Image- Versus Cone Beam CT Image-Guided Radiation Therapy: A Clinical Study of Early Breast Cancer Treated With External Beam Partial Breast Irradiation

OBJECTIVE: To compare differences in setup error assessment and correction between planar kilovolt images and cone beam computed tomography images for external beam partial breast irradiation during free breathing. METHODS: Nineteen patients who received external beam partial breast irradiation afte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Wei, Yu, Ting, Xu, Min, Shao, Qian, Zhang, Yingjie, Li, Jianbin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6552346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31159668
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1533033819853847
_version_ 1783424582110150656
author Wang, Wei
Yu, Ting
Xu, Min
Shao, Qian
Zhang, Yingjie
Li, Jianbin
author_facet Wang, Wei
Yu, Ting
Xu, Min
Shao, Qian
Zhang, Yingjie
Li, Jianbin
author_sort Wang, Wei
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare differences in setup error assessment and correction between planar kilovolt images and cone beam computed tomography images for external beam partial breast irradiation during free breathing. METHODS: Nineteen patients who received external beam partial breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery were recruited. Interfraction setup error was acquired using planar kilovolt images and cone beam computed tomography. After online setup correction, the residual error was calculated, and the setup error was compared. The residual error and setup margin were quantified for planar kilovolt and cone beam computed tomography images. RESULTS: The largest setup error was observed in the anteroposterior direction for both cone beam computed tomography and planar kilovolt imaging (−1.45 mm, 1.74 mm). The cone beam computed tomography–based setup error (systematic error [Σ]) was less than the planar kilovolt images based on Σ in the anteroposterior direction (–1.2 mm vs 2.00 mm; P = .005), and no significant differences were observed for random error (σ) in 3 dimensions (P = .948, .376, .314). After online setup correction, cone beam computed tomography significantly reduced the residual setup error compared with planar kilovolt images in the anteroposterior direction (Σ: −0.20 mm vs 0.50 mm, P = .008; σ: 0.45 mm vs 1.34 mm, P = .002). The cone beam computed tomography–based setup margin was smaller than the planar kilovolt image-based setup margin in the anteroposterior direction (−1.39 mm vs 5.57 mm, P = .003; 0.00 mm vs 3.20 mm, P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: Discrepancy between the setup errors observed with planar kilovolt and cone beam computed tomography was obvious in the anteroposterior direction. Compared to cone beam computed tomography, the elapsed treatment time was smaller when the initial alignment used kilovolt planar imaging. Whether using planar kilovolt or cone beam computed tomography, residual errors can be reduced to 1.5 mm for external beam partial breast irradiation procedures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6552346
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65523462019-06-17 Setup Error Assessment and Correction in Planar kV Image- Versus Cone Beam CT Image-Guided Radiation Therapy: A Clinical Study of Early Breast Cancer Treated With External Beam Partial Breast Irradiation Wang, Wei Yu, Ting Xu, Min Shao, Qian Zhang, Yingjie Li, Jianbin Technol Cancer Res Treat Original Article OBJECTIVE: To compare differences in setup error assessment and correction between planar kilovolt images and cone beam computed tomography images for external beam partial breast irradiation during free breathing. METHODS: Nineteen patients who received external beam partial breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery were recruited. Interfraction setup error was acquired using planar kilovolt images and cone beam computed tomography. After online setup correction, the residual error was calculated, and the setup error was compared. The residual error and setup margin were quantified for planar kilovolt and cone beam computed tomography images. RESULTS: The largest setup error was observed in the anteroposterior direction for both cone beam computed tomography and planar kilovolt imaging (−1.45 mm, 1.74 mm). The cone beam computed tomography–based setup error (systematic error [Σ]) was less than the planar kilovolt images based on Σ in the anteroposterior direction (–1.2 mm vs 2.00 mm; P = .005), and no significant differences were observed for random error (σ) in 3 dimensions (P = .948, .376, .314). After online setup correction, cone beam computed tomography significantly reduced the residual setup error compared with planar kilovolt images in the anteroposterior direction (Σ: −0.20 mm vs 0.50 mm, P = .008; σ: 0.45 mm vs 1.34 mm, P = .002). The cone beam computed tomography–based setup margin was smaller than the planar kilovolt image-based setup margin in the anteroposterior direction (−1.39 mm vs 5.57 mm, P = .003; 0.00 mm vs 3.20 mm, P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: Discrepancy between the setup errors observed with planar kilovolt and cone beam computed tomography was obvious in the anteroposterior direction. Compared to cone beam computed tomography, the elapsed treatment time was smaller when the initial alignment used kilovolt planar imaging. Whether using planar kilovolt or cone beam computed tomography, residual errors can be reduced to 1.5 mm for external beam partial breast irradiation procedures. SAGE Publications 2019-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6552346/ /pubmed/31159668 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1533033819853847 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Wang, Wei
Yu, Ting
Xu, Min
Shao, Qian
Zhang, Yingjie
Li, Jianbin
Setup Error Assessment and Correction in Planar kV Image- Versus Cone Beam CT Image-Guided Radiation Therapy: A Clinical Study of Early Breast Cancer Treated With External Beam Partial Breast Irradiation
title Setup Error Assessment and Correction in Planar kV Image- Versus Cone Beam CT Image-Guided Radiation Therapy: A Clinical Study of Early Breast Cancer Treated With External Beam Partial Breast Irradiation
title_full Setup Error Assessment and Correction in Planar kV Image- Versus Cone Beam CT Image-Guided Radiation Therapy: A Clinical Study of Early Breast Cancer Treated With External Beam Partial Breast Irradiation
title_fullStr Setup Error Assessment and Correction in Planar kV Image- Versus Cone Beam CT Image-Guided Radiation Therapy: A Clinical Study of Early Breast Cancer Treated With External Beam Partial Breast Irradiation
title_full_unstemmed Setup Error Assessment and Correction in Planar kV Image- Versus Cone Beam CT Image-Guided Radiation Therapy: A Clinical Study of Early Breast Cancer Treated With External Beam Partial Breast Irradiation
title_short Setup Error Assessment and Correction in Planar kV Image- Versus Cone Beam CT Image-Guided Radiation Therapy: A Clinical Study of Early Breast Cancer Treated With External Beam Partial Breast Irradiation
title_sort setup error assessment and correction in planar kv image- versus cone beam ct image-guided radiation therapy: a clinical study of early breast cancer treated with external beam partial breast irradiation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6552346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31159668
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1533033819853847
work_keys_str_mv AT wangwei setuperrorassessmentandcorrectioninplanarkvimageversusconebeamctimageguidedradiationtherapyaclinicalstudyofearlybreastcancertreatedwithexternalbeampartialbreastirradiation
AT yuting setuperrorassessmentandcorrectioninplanarkvimageversusconebeamctimageguidedradiationtherapyaclinicalstudyofearlybreastcancertreatedwithexternalbeampartialbreastirradiation
AT xumin setuperrorassessmentandcorrectioninplanarkvimageversusconebeamctimageguidedradiationtherapyaclinicalstudyofearlybreastcancertreatedwithexternalbeampartialbreastirradiation
AT shaoqian setuperrorassessmentandcorrectioninplanarkvimageversusconebeamctimageguidedradiationtherapyaclinicalstudyofearlybreastcancertreatedwithexternalbeampartialbreastirradiation
AT zhangyingjie setuperrorassessmentandcorrectioninplanarkvimageversusconebeamctimageguidedradiationtherapyaclinicalstudyofearlybreastcancertreatedwithexternalbeampartialbreastirradiation
AT lijianbin setuperrorassessmentandcorrectioninplanarkvimageversusconebeamctimageguidedradiationtherapyaclinicalstudyofearlybreastcancertreatedwithexternalbeampartialbreastirradiation