Cargando…

Evaluation of the Effect of Surgeon's Operative Volume and Specialty on Likelihood of Revision After Mesh Midurethral Sling Placement

OBJECTIVE: To estimate rates of revision surgery after insertion of mesh midurethral slings and explore whether physician specialty, annual operative volume, or hospital type are associated with this outcome. METHODS: A population-based retrospective cohort of women undergoing midurethral sling proc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brennand, Erin A., Quan, Hude
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6553521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31135723
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003275
_version_ 1783424829216522240
author Brennand, Erin A.
Quan, Hude
author_facet Brennand, Erin A.
Quan, Hude
author_sort Brennand, Erin A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To estimate rates of revision surgery after insertion of mesh midurethral slings and explore whether physician specialty, annual operative volume, or hospital type are associated with this outcome. METHODS: A population-based retrospective cohort of women undergoing midurethral sling procedures over a 13-year interval (2004–2017) in Alberta, Canada was created using administrative health data. The primary outcome was subsequent surgery for revision of midurethral sling, defined by a composite of surgical procedures. Exposures included annual number of midurethral sling procedures performed by the surgeon, surgeon specialty, facility type, patient age, and concomitant prolapse repair. Mixed effects logistic regression using linear spines was used to test a-priori hypothesis that annual surgical volume would be inversely related in a nonlinear fashion to risk of revision. RESULTS: In the cohort of 19,511 women, cumulative rates of revision surgery were 3.84% (95% CI 3.54–4.17) at 5 years and 5.26% (95% CI 4.82–5.74) at 10 years. The first year after midurethral sling placement was the most vulnerable window, with 0.40% (95% CI 0.31–0.49) undergoing revision within 30 days and 2.15% (95% CI 1.95–3.52) within 1 year. Concomitant prolapse repairs (odds ratio [OR] 1.24, 95% CI 1.04–1.48) and surgeon's annual volume were associated with revision. After 50 cases per year, odds of revision declined with each additional case (OR 0.99/case, 95% CI 0.98–0.99, OR 0.91/10 cases, 95% CI 0.84–0.98) and plateaued at 110 cases per year. Surgeon specialty, hospital type, and patient age were not associated with outcome. CONCLUSION: One in 20 women undergo revision surgery within 10 years after midurethral sling placement. Higher physician surgical volume is associated with decreased risk, with the decline occurring at a threshold of 50 cases annually. Minimum caseload parameters for surgeons performing midurethral sling procedures may improve quality of these procedures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6553521
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65535212019-07-22 Evaluation of the Effect of Surgeon's Operative Volume and Specialty on Likelihood of Revision After Mesh Midurethral Sling Placement Brennand, Erin A. Quan, Hude Obstet Gynecol Contents OBJECTIVE: To estimate rates of revision surgery after insertion of mesh midurethral slings and explore whether physician specialty, annual operative volume, or hospital type are associated with this outcome. METHODS: A population-based retrospective cohort of women undergoing midurethral sling procedures over a 13-year interval (2004–2017) in Alberta, Canada was created using administrative health data. The primary outcome was subsequent surgery for revision of midurethral sling, defined by a composite of surgical procedures. Exposures included annual number of midurethral sling procedures performed by the surgeon, surgeon specialty, facility type, patient age, and concomitant prolapse repair. Mixed effects logistic regression using linear spines was used to test a-priori hypothesis that annual surgical volume would be inversely related in a nonlinear fashion to risk of revision. RESULTS: In the cohort of 19,511 women, cumulative rates of revision surgery were 3.84% (95% CI 3.54–4.17) at 5 years and 5.26% (95% CI 4.82–5.74) at 10 years. The first year after midurethral sling placement was the most vulnerable window, with 0.40% (95% CI 0.31–0.49) undergoing revision within 30 days and 2.15% (95% CI 1.95–3.52) within 1 year. Concomitant prolapse repairs (odds ratio [OR] 1.24, 95% CI 1.04–1.48) and surgeon's annual volume were associated with revision. After 50 cases per year, odds of revision declined with each additional case (OR 0.99/case, 95% CI 0.98–0.99, OR 0.91/10 cases, 95% CI 0.84–0.98) and plateaued at 110 cases per year. Surgeon specialty, hospital type, and patient age were not associated with outcome. CONCLUSION: One in 20 women undergo revision surgery within 10 years after midurethral sling placement. Higher physician surgical volume is associated with decreased risk, with the decline occurring at a threshold of 50 cases annually. Minimum caseload parameters for surgeons performing midurethral sling procedures may improve quality of these procedures. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2019-06 2019-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6553521/ /pubmed/31135723 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003275 Text en © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Contents
Brennand, Erin A.
Quan, Hude
Evaluation of the Effect of Surgeon's Operative Volume and Specialty on Likelihood of Revision After Mesh Midurethral Sling Placement
title Evaluation of the Effect of Surgeon's Operative Volume and Specialty on Likelihood of Revision After Mesh Midurethral Sling Placement
title_full Evaluation of the Effect of Surgeon's Operative Volume and Specialty on Likelihood of Revision After Mesh Midurethral Sling Placement
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Effect of Surgeon's Operative Volume and Specialty on Likelihood of Revision After Mesh Midurethral Sling Placement
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Effect of Surgeon's Operative Volume and Specialty on Likelihood of Revision After Mesh Midurethral Sling Placement
title_short Evaluation of the Effect of Surgeon's Operative Volume and Specialty on Likelihood of Revision After Mesh Midurethral Sling Placement
title_sort evaluation of the effect of surgeon's operative volume and specialty on likelihood of revision after mesh midurethral sling placement
topic Contents
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6553521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31135723
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003275
work_keys_str_mv AT brennanderina evaluationoftheeffectofsurgeonsoperativevolumeandspecialtyonlikelihoodofrevisionaftermeshmidurethralslingplacement
AT quanhude evaluationoftheeffectofsurgeonsoperativevolumeandspecialtyonlikelihoodofrevisionaftermeshmidurethralslingplacement