Cargando…

Molecular profiling of cancer patients enables personalized combination therapy: the I-PREDICT study

Cancer treatments have evolved from indiscriminate cytotoxic agents to selective genome- and immune-targeted drugs that have transformed outcomes for some malignancies.(1) Tumor complexity and heterogeneity suggest that the “precision medicine” paradigm of cancer therapy requires treatment to be per...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sicklick, Jason K., Kato, Shumei, Okamura, Ryosuke, Schwaederle, Maria, Hahn, Michael E., Williams, Casey B., De, Pradip, Krie, Amy, Piccioni, David E., Miller, Vincent A., Ross, Jeffrey S., Benson, Adam, Webster, Jennifer, Stephens, Philip J., Lee, J. Jack, Fanta, Paul T., Lippman, Scott M., Leyland-Jones, Brian, Kurzrock, Razelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6553618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31011206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41591-019-0407-5
_version_ 1783424844284559360
author Sicklick, Jason K.
Kato, Shumei
Okamura, Ryosuke
Schwaederle, Maria
Hahn, Michael E.
Williams, Casey B.
De, Pradip
Krie, Amy
Piccioni, David E.
Miller, Vincent A.
Ross, Jeffrey S.
Benson, Adam
Webster, Jennifer
Stephens, Philip J.
Lee, J. Jack
Fanta, Paul T.
Lippman, Scott M.
Leyland-Jones, Brian
Kurzrock, Razelle
author_facet Sicklick, Jason K.
Kato, Shumei
Okamura, Ryosuke
Schwaederle, Maria
Hahn, Michael E.
Williams, Casey B.
De, Pradip
Krie, Amy
Piccioni, David E.
Miller, Vincent A.
Ross, Jeffrey S.
Benson, Adam
Webster, Jennifer
Stephens, Philip J.
Lee, J. Jack
Fanta, Paul T.
Lippman, Scott M.
Leyland-Jones, Brian
Kurzrock, Razelle
author_sort Sicklick, Jason K.
collection PubMed
description Cancer treatments have evolved from indiscriminate cytotoxic agents to selective genome- and immune-targeted drugs that have transformed outcomes for some malignancies.(1) Tumor complexity and heterogeneity suggest that the “precision medicine” paradigm of cancer therapy requires treatment to be personalized to the individual patient.(2–6) To date, precision oncology trials have been based upon molecular matching with predetermined monotherapies.(7–14) Several of these trials have been hindered by very low matching rates, often in the 5–10% range,(15) and low response rates. Low matching rates may be due to the use of limited gene panels, restrictive molecular matching algorithms, lack of drug availability or the deterioration and death of end-stage patients before therapy can be implemented. We hypothesized that personalized treatment with combination therapies would improve outcomes in patients with refractory malignancies. As a first test of this concept, we implemented a cross-institutional, prospective study (I-PREDICT, NCT02534675) that used tumor DNA sequencing and timely recommendations for individualized treatment with combination therapies. We found that administration of customized multi-drug regimens was feasible, with 49% of consented patients receiving personalized treatment. Targeting of a larger fraction of identified molecular alterations, yielding a higher “matching score,” was correlated with significantly improved disease control rates, as well as longer progression-free and overall survival rates, as compared to when fewer somatic alterations were targeted. Our findings suggest that the current clinical trial paradigm for precision oncology, which pairs one driver mutation with one drug, may be optimized by treating molecularly complex and heterogeneous cancers with combinations of customized agents.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6553618
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65536182019-10-22 Molecular profiling of cancer patients enables personalized combination therapy: the I-PREDICT study Sicklick, Jason K. Kato, Shumei Okamura, Ryosuke Schwaederle, Maria Hahn, Michael E. Williams, Casey B. De, Pradip Krie, Amy Piccioni, David E. Miller, Vincent A. Ross, Jeffrey S. Benson, Adam Webster, Jennifer Stephens, Philip J. Lee, J. Jack Fanta, Paul T. Lippman, Scott M. Leyland-Jones, Brian Kurzrock, Razelle Nat Med Article Cancer treatments have evolved from indiscriminate cytotoxic agents to selective genome- and immune-targeted drugs that have transformed outcomes for some malignancies.(1) Tumor complexity and heterogeneity suggest that the “precision medicine” paradigm of cancer therapy requires treatment to be personalized to the individual patient.(2–6) To date, precision oncology trials have been based upon molecular matching with predetermined monotherapies.(7–14) Several of these trials have been hindered by very low matching rates, often in the 5–10% range,(15) and low response rates. Low matching rates may be due to the use of limited gene panels, restrictive molecular matching algorithms, lack of drug availability or the deterioration and death of end-stage patients before therapy can be implemented. We hypothesized that personalized treatment with combination therapies would improve outcomes in patients with refractory malignancies. As a first test of this concept, we implemented a cross-institutional, prospective study (I-PREDICT, NCT02534675) that used tumor DNA sequencing and timely recommendations for individualized treatment with combination therapies. We found that administration of customized multi-drug regimens was feasible, with 49% of consented patients receiving personalized treatment. Targeting of a larger fraction of identified molecular alterations, yielding a higher “matching score,” was correlated with significantly improved disease control rates, as well as longer progression-free and overall survival rates, as compared to when fewer somatic alterations were targeted. Our findings suggest that the current clinical trial paradigm for precision oncology, which pairs one driver mutation with one drug, may be optimized by treating molecularly complex and heterogeneous cancers with combinations of customized agents. 2019-04-22 2019-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6553618/ /pubmed/31011206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41591-019-0407-5 Text en Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms
spellingShingle Article
Sicklick, Jason K.
Kato, Shumei
Okamura, Ryosuke
Schwaederle, Maria
Hahn, Michael E.
Williams, Casey B.
De, Pradip
Krie, Amy
Piccioni, David E.
Miller, Vincent A.
Ross, Jeffrey S.
Benson, Adam
Webster, Jennifer
Stephens, Philip J.
Lee, J. Jack
Fanta, Paul T.
Lippman, Scott M.
Leyland-Jones, Brian
Kurzrock, Razelle
Molecular profiling of cancer patients enables personalized combination therapy: the I-PREDICT study
title Molecular profiling of cancer patients enables personalized combination therapy: the I-PREDICT study
title_full Molecular profiling of cancer patients enables personalized combination therapy: the I-PREDICT study
title_fullStr Molecular profiling of cancer patients enables personalized combination therapy: the I-PREDICT study
title_full_unstemmed Molecular profiling of cancer patients enables personalized combination therapy: the I-PREDICT study
title_short Molecular profiling of cancer patients enables personalized combination therapy: the I-PREDICT study
title_sort molecular profiling of cancer patients enables personalized combination therapy: the i-predict study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6553618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31011206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41591-019-0407-5
work_keys_str_mv AT sicklickjasonk molecularprofilingofcancerpatientsenablespersonalizedcombinationtherapytheipredictstudy
AT katoshumei molecularprofilingofcancerpatientsenablespersonalizedcombinationtherapytheipredictstudy
AT okamuraryosuke molecularprofilingofcancerpatientsenablespersonalizedcombinationtherapytheipredictstudy
AT schwaederlemaria molecularprofilingofcancerpatientsenablespersonalizedcombinationtherapytheipredictstudy
AT hahnmichaele molecularprofilingofcancerpatientsenablespersonalizedcombinationtherapytheipredictstudy
AT williamscaseyb molecularprofilingofcancerpatientsenablespersonalizedcombinationtherapytheipredictstudy
AT depradip molecularprofilingofcancerpatientsenablespersonalizedcombinationtherapytheipredictstudy
AT krieamy molecularprofilingofcancerpatientsenablespersonalizedcombinationtherapytheipredictstudy
AT piccionidavide molecularprofilingofcancerpatientsenablespersonalizedcombinationtherapytheipredictstudy
AT millervincenta molecularprofilingofcancerpatientsenablespersonalizedcombinationtherapytheipredictstudy
AT rossjeffreys molecularprofilingofcancerpatientsenablespersonalizedcombinationtherapytheipredictstudy
AT bensonadam molecularprofilingofcancerpatientsenablespersonalizedcombinationtherapytheipredictstudy
AT websterjennifer molecularprofilingofcancerpatientsenablespersonalizedcombinationtherapytheipredictstudy
AT stephensphilipj molecularprofilingofcancerpatientsenablespersonalizedcombinationtherapytheipredictstudy
AT leejjack molecularprofilingofcancerpatientsenablespersonalizedcombinationtherapytheipredictstudy
AT fantapault molecularprofilingofcancerpatientsenablespersonalizedcombinationtherapytheipredictstudy
AT lippmanscottm molecularprofilingofcancerpatientsenablespersonalizedcombinationtherapytheipredictstudy
AT leylandjonesbrian molecularprofilingofcancerpatientsenablespersonalizedcombinationtherapytheipredictstudy
AT kurzrockrazelle molecularprofilingofcancerpatientsenablespersonalizedcombinationtherapytheipredictstudy