Cargando…

EUS-guided tissue acquisition in the study of the adrenal glands: Results of a nationwide multicenter study

BACKGROUND: There are limited data about the role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA), by fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) or biopsy (EUS-FNB), in the evaluation of the adrenal glands (AG). The primary aim was to assess the diagnostic yield and safety. The secondary aims were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martin-Cardona, A., Fernandez-Esparrach, G., Subtil, J. C., Iglesias-Garcia, J., Garcia-Guix, M., Barturen Barroso, A., Gimeno-Garcia, A. Z., Esteban, J. M., Pardo Balteiro, A., Velasco-Guardado, A., Vazquez-Sequeiros, E., Loras, C., Martinez-Moreno, B., Castellot, A., Huertas, C., Martinez-Lapiedra, M., Sanchez-Yague, A., Teran, A., Morales-Alvarado, V. J., Betes, M., de la Iglesia, D., Sánchez-Montes, C., Lozano, M. D., Lariño-Noia, J., Gines, A., Tebe, C., Gornals, J. B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6553722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31170163
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216658
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: There are limited data about the role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA), by fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) or biopsy (EUS-FNB), in the evaluation of the adrenal glands (AG). The primary aim was to assess the diagnostic yield and safety. The secondary aims were the malignancy predictors, and to create a predictive model of malignancy. METHODS: This was a retrospective nationwide study involving all Spanish hospitals experienced in EUS-TA of AGs. Inclusion period was from April-2003 to April-2016. Inclusion criteria: all consecutive cases that underwent EUS-TA of AGs. EUS and cytopathology findings were evaluated. Statistical analyses: diagnostic accuracy of echoendoscopist’s suspicion using cytology by EUS-TA, as gold standard; multivariate logistic regression model to predict tumor malignancy. RESULTS: A total of 204 EUS-TA of AGs were evaluated. Primary tumor locations were lung70%, others19%, and unknown11%. AG samples were adequate for cytological diagnosis in 91%, and confirmed malignancy in 60%. Diagnostic accuracy of the endosonographer's suspicion was 68%. The most common technique was: a 22-G (65%) and cytological needle (75%) with suction-syringe (66%). No serious adverse events were described. The variables most associated with malignancy were size>30mm (OR2.27; 95%CI, 1.16–4.05), heterogeneous echo-pattern (OR2.11; 95%CI, 1.1–3.9), variegated AG shape (OR2.46; 95%CI, 1–6.24), and endosonographer suspicion (OR17.46; 95%CI, 6.2–58.5). The best variables for a predictive multivariate logistic model of malignancy were age, sex, echo-pattern, and AG-shape. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-TA of the AGs is a safe, minimally invasive procedure, allowing an excellent diagnostic yield. These results suggest the possibility of developing a pre-EUS procedure predictive malignancy model.