Cargando…

Comparison of replica leaf surface materials for phyllosphere microbiology

Artificial surfaces are routinely used instead of leaves to enable a reductionist approach in phyllosphere microbiology, the study of microorganisms residing on plant leaf surfaces. Commonly used artificial surfaces include, flat surfaces, such as metal and nutrient agar, and microstructured surface...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soffe, Rebecca, Altenhuber, Nicola, Bernach, Michal, Remus-Emsermann, Mitja N.P., Nock, Volker
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6553772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31170240
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218102
_version_ 1783424874510811136
author Soffe, Rebecca
Altenhuber, Nicola
Bernach, Michal
Remus-Emsermann, Mitja N.P.
Nock, Volker
author_facet Soffe, Rebecca
Altenhuber, Nicola
Bernach, Michal
Remus-Emsermann, Mitja N.P.
Nock, Volker
author_sort Soffe, Rebecca
collection PubMed
description Artificial surfaces are routinely used instead of leaves to enable a reductionist approach in phyllosphere microbiology, the study of microorganisms residing on plant leaf surfaces. Commonly used artificial surfaces include, flat surfaces, such as metal and nutrient agar, and microstructured surfaces, such as isolate leaf cuticles or reconstituted leaf waxes. However, interest in replica leaf surfaces as an artificial surface is growing, as replica surfaces provide an improved representation of the complex topography of leaf surfaces. To date, leaf surfaces have predominantly been replicated for their superhydrophobic properties. In contrast, in this paper we investigated the potential of agarose, the elastomer polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), and gelatin as replica leaf surface materials for phyllosphere microbiology studies. Using a test pattern of pillars, we investigated the ability to replicate microstructures into the materials, as well as the degradation characteristics of the materials in environmental conditions. Pillars produced in PDMS were measured to be within 10% of the mold master and remained stable throughout the degradation experiments. In agarose and gelatin the pillars deviated by more than 10% and degraded considerably within 48 hours in environmental conditions. Furthermore, we investigated the surface energy of the materials, an important property of a leaf surface, which influences resource availability and microorganism attachment. We found that the surface energy and bacterial viability on PDMS was comparable to isolated Citrus × aurantium and Populus × canescens leaf cuticles. Hence indicating that PDMS is the most suitable material for replica leaf surfaces. In summary, our experiments highlight the importance of considering the inherent material properties when selecting a replica leaf surface for phyllosphere microbiology studies. As demonstrated, a PDMS replica leaf offers a control surface that can be used for investigating microbe-microbe and microbe-plant interactions in the phyllosphere, which will enable mitigation strategies against pathogens to be developed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6553772
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65537722019-06-17 Comparison of replica leaf surface materials for phyllosphere microbiology Soffe, Rebecca Altenhuber, Nicola Bernach, Michal Remus-Emsermann, Mitja N.P. Nock, Volker PLoS One Research Article Artificial surfaces are routinely used instead of leaves to enable a reductionist approach in phyllosphere microbiology, the study of microorganisms residing on plant leaf surfaces. Commonly used artificial surfaces include, flat surfaces, such as metal and nutrient agar, and microstructured surfaces, such as isolate leaf cuticles or reconstituted leaf waxes. However, interest in replica leaf surfaces as an artificial surface is growing, as replica surfaces provide an improved representation of the complex topography of leaf surfaces. To date, leaf surfaces have predominantly been replicated for their superhydrophobic properties. In contrast, in this paper we investigated the potential of agarose, the elastomer polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), and gelatin as replica leaf surface materials for phyllosphere microbiology studies. Using a test pattern of pillars, we investigated the ability to replicate microstructures into the materials, as well as the degradation characteristics of the materials in environmental conditions. Pillars produced in PDMS were measured to be within 10% of the mold master and remained stable throughout the degradation experiments. In agarose and gelatin the pillars deviated by more than 10% and degraded considerably within 48 hours in environmental conditions. Furthermore, we investigated the surface energy of the materials, an important property of a leaf surface, which influences resource availability and microorganism attachment. We found that the surface energy and bacterial viability on PDMS was comparable to isolated Citrus × aurantium and Populus × canescens leaf cuticles. Hence indicating that PDMS is the most suitable material for replica leaf surfaces. In summary, our experiments highlight the importance of considering the inherent material properties when selecting a replica leaf surface for phyllosphere microbiology studies. As demonstrated, a PDMS replica leaf offers a control surface that can be used for investigating microbe-microbe and microbe-plant interactions in the phyllosphere, which will enable mitigation strategies against pathogens to be developed. Public Library of Science 2019-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6553772/ /pubmed/31170240 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218102 Text en © 2019 Soffe et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Soffe, Rebecca
Altenhuber, Nicola
Bernach, Michal
Remus-Emsermann, Mitja N.P.
Nock, Volker
Comparison of replica leaf surface materials for phyllosphere microbiology
title Comparison of replica leaf surface materials for phyllosphere microbiology
title_full Comparison of replica leaf surface materials for phyllosphere microbiology
title_fullStr Comparison of replica leaf surface materials for phyllosphere microbiology
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of replica leaf surface materials for phyllosphere microbiology
title_short Comparison of replica leaf surface materials for phyllosphere microbiology
title_sort comparison of replica leaf surface materials for phyllosphere microbiology
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6553772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31170240
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218102
work_keys_str_mv AT sofferebecca comparisonofreplicaleafsurfacematerialsforphyllospheremicrobiology
AT altenhubernicola comparisonofreplicaleafsurfacematerialsforphyllospheremicrobiology
AT bernachmichal comparisonofreplicaleafsurfacematerialsforphyllospheremicrobiology
AT remusemsermannmitjanp comparisonofreplicaleafsurfacematerialsforphyllospheremicrobiology
AT nockvolker comparisonofreplicaleafsurfacematerialsforphyllospheremicrobiology