Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness and budgetary impact of HCV treatment with direct-acting antivirals in India including the risk of reinfection

BACKGROUND: HCV direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) are produced in India at low cost. However, concerns surrounding reinfection and budgetary impact limit treatment scale-up in India. We evaluate the cost-effectiveness and budgetary impact of HCV treatment in India, including reinfection. METHODS: A cl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chaillon, Antoine, Mehta, Sanjay R., Hoenigl, Martin, Solomon, Sunil S., Vickerman, Peter, Hickman, Matthew, Skaathun, Britt, Martin, Natasha K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6553784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31170246
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217964
_version_ 1783424877368180736
author Chaillon, Antoine
Mehta, Sanjay R.
Hoenigl, Martin
Solomon, Sunil S.
Vickerman, Peter
Hickman, Matthew
Skaathun, Britt
Martin, Natasha K.
author_facet Chaillon, Antoine
Mehta, Sanjay R.
Hoenigl, Martin
Solomon, Sunil S.
Vickerman, Peter
Hickman, Matthew
Skaathun, Britt
Martin, Natasha K.
author_sort Chaillon, Antoine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: HCV direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) are produced in India at low cost. However, concerns surrounding reinfection and budgetary impact limit treatment scale-up in India. We evaluate the cost-effectiveness and budgetary impact of HCV treatment in India, including reinfection. METHODS: A closed cohort Markov model of HCV disease progression, treatment, and reinfection was parameterized. We compared treatment by fibrosis stage (F2-F4 or F0-F4) to no treatment from a health care payer perspective. Costs (2017 USD$, based on India-specific data) and health utilities (in quality-adjusted life years, QALYs) were attached to each health state. We assumed DAAs with 90% sustained viral response at $900/treatment and 1%/year reinfection, varied in the sensitivity analysis from 0.1–15%. We deemed the intervention cost-effective if the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) fell below India’s per capita GDP ($1,709). We assessed the budgetary impact of treating all diagnosed individuals. RESULTS: HCV treatment for diagnosed F2-F4 individuals was cost-saving (net costs -$2,881 and net QALYs 3.18/person treated; negative ICER) compared to no treatment. HCV treatment remained cost-saving with reinfection rates of 15%/year. Treating all diagnosed individuals was likely cost-effective compared to delay until F2 (mean ICER $1,586/QALY gained, 67% of simulations falling under the $1,709 threshold) with 1%/year reinfection. For all scenarios, annual retesting for reinfection was more cost-effective than the current policy (one-time retest). Treating all diagnosed individuals and reinfections results in net costs of $445–1,334 million over 5 years (<0.25% of total health care expenditure over 5 years), and cost-savings within 14 years. CONCLUSIONS: HCV treatment was highly cost-effective in India, despite reinfection. Annual retesting for reinfection was cost-effective, supporting a policy change towards more frequent retesting. A comprehensive HCV treatment scale-up plan is warranted in India.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6553784
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65537842019-06-17 Cost-effectiveness and budgetary impact of HCV treatment with direct-acting antivirals in India including the risk of reinfection Chaillon, Antoine Mehta, Sanjay R. Hoenigl, Martin Solomon, Sunil S. Vickerman, Peter Hickman, Matthew Skaathun, Britt Martin, Natasha K. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: HCV direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) are produced in India at low cost. However, concerns surrounding reinfection and budgetary impact limit treatment scale-up in India. We evaluate the cost-effectiveness and budgetary impact of HCV treatment in India, including reinfection. METHODS: A closed cohort Markov model of HCV disease progression, treatment, and reinfection was parameterized. We compared treatment by fibrosis stage (F2-F4 or F0-F4) to no treatment from a health care payer perspective. Costs (2017 USD$, based on India-specific data) and health utilities (in quality-adjusted life years, QALYs) were attached to each health state. We assumed DAAs with 90% sustained viral response at $900/treatment and 1%/year reinfection, varied in the sensitivity analysis from 0.1–15%. We deemed the intervention cost-effective if the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) fell below India’s per capita GDP ($1,709). We assessed the budgetary impact of treating all diagnosed individuals. RESULTS: HCV treatment for diagnosed F2-F4 individuals was cost-saving (net costs -$2,881 and net QALYs 3.18/person treated; negative ICER) compared to no treatment. HCV treatment remained cost-saving with reinfection rates of 15%/year. Treating all diagnosed individuals was likely cost-effective compared to delay until F2 (mean ICER $1,586/QALY gained, 67% of simulations falling under the $1,709 threshold) with 1%/year reinfection. For all scenarios, annual retesting for reinfection was more cost-effective than the current policy (one-time retest). Treating all diagnosed individuals and reinfections results in net costs of $445–1,334 million over 5 years (<0.25% of total health care expenditure over 5 years), and cost-savings within 14 years. CONCLUSIONS: HCV treatment was highly cost-effective in India, despite reinfection. Annual retesting for reinfection was cost-effective, supporting a policy change towards more frequent retesting. A comprehensive HCV treatment scale-up plan is warranted in India. Public Library of Science 2019-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6553784/ /pubmed/31170246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217964 Text en © 2019 Chaillon et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chaillon, Antoine
Mehta, Sanjay R.
Hoenigl, Martin
Solomon, Sunil S.
Vickerman, Peter
Hickman, Matthew
Skaathun, Britt
Martin, Natasha K.
Cost-effectiveness and budgetary impact of HCV treatment with direct-acting antivirals in India including the risk of reinfection
title Cost-effectiveness and budgetary impact of HCV treatment with direct-acting antivirals in India including the risk of reinfection
title_full Cost-effectiveness and budgetary impact of HCV treatment with direct-acting antivirals in India including the risk of reinfection
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness and budgetary impact of HCV treatment with direct-acting antivirals in India including the risk of reinfection
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness and budgetary impact of HCV treatment with direct-acting antivirals in India including the risk of reinfection
title_short Cost-effectiveness and budgetary impact of HCV treatment with direct-acting antivirals in India including the risk of reinfection
title_sort cost-effectiveness and budgetary impact of hcv treatment with direct-acting antivirals in india including the risk of reinfection
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6553784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31170246
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217964
work_keys_str_mv AT chaillonantoine costeffectivenessandbudgetaryimpactofhcvtreatmentwithdirectactingantiviralsinindiaincludingtheriskofreinfection
AT mehtasanjayr costeffectivenessandbudgetaryimpactofhcvtreatmentwithdirectactingantiviralsinindiaincludingtheriskofreinfection
AT hoeniglmartin costeffectivenessandbudgetaryimpactofhcvtreatmentwithdirectactingantiviralsinindiaincludingtheriskofreinfection
AT solomonsunils costeffectivenessandbudgetaryimpactofhcvtreatmentwithdirectactingantiviralsinindiaincludingtheriskofreinfection
AT vickermanpeter costeffectivenessandbudgetaryimpactofhcvtreatmentwithdirectactingantiviralsinindiaincludingtheriskofreinfection
AT hickmanmatthew costeffectivenessandbudgetaryimpactofhcvtreatmentwithdirectactingantiviralsinindiaincludingtheriskofreinfection
AT skaathunbritt costeffectivenessandbudgetaryimpactofhcvtreatmentwithdirectactingantiviralsinindiaincludingtheriskofreinfection
AT martinnatashak costeffectivenessandbudgetaryimpactofhcvtreatmentwithdirectactingantiviralsinindiaincludingtheriskofreinfection