Cargando…
Clivopalate angle: a new diagnostic method for basilar invagination at magnetic resonance imaging
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the diagnostic value of clivopalate angle (CPA) for basilar invagination (BI) at magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: In this retrospective case-control study, CPA, clivodens angle (CDA), and clivoaxial angle (CXA) were measured on midsagittal MR images from 112 pati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6554245/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30820721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5972-3 |
_version_ | 1783424931385573376 |
---|---|
author | Ma, Lichao Guo, Liuji Li, Xiaodan Qin, Jie He, Wenle Xiao, Xiang Lu, Lijun Xu, Yikai Wu, Yuankui |
author_facet | Ma, Lichao Guo, Liuji Li, Xiaodan Qin, Jie He, Wenle Xiao, Xiang Lu, Lijun Xu, Yikai Wu, Yuankui |
author_sort | Ma, Lichao |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To investigate the diagnostic value of clivopalate angle (CPA) for basilar invagination (BI) at magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: In this retrospective case-control study, CPA, clivodens angle (CDA), and clivoaxial angle (CXA) were measured on midsagittal MR images from 112 patients with BI (22 men; mean age, 43.9 years ± 13.1 years; range, 21–79 years) and 200 control subjects (57 men; mean age, 47.1 years ± 13.3 years; range, 20–80 years). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), linear regression, Mann-Whitney U test, binary logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Clivopalate angle showed better inter-observer agreement (ICC = 0.951) than CXA (0.867) or CDA (0.853). CPA significantly correlated with CXA (R = 0.811, p < 0.001) and CDA (R = 0.716, p < 0.001). Patients with BI had a significantly smaller CPA (45.9° ± 9.9°) than control subjects (61.9° ± 6.2°) (p < 0.001). With the optimal cutoff value of 53.5°, CPA had a sensitivity of 0.839 (94/112) and a specificity of 0.915 (183/200). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.937 (95% CI, 0.911–0.963) for CPA, which was similar to that of CXA (AUC, 0.957; 95% CI, 0.936–0.978) or CDA (AUC, 0.925; 95% CI, 0.892–0.957). The combination of CPA and CDA or CXA showed a higher diagnostic value than CDA or CXA alone. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic performance of CPA was similar to that of CXA or CDA, but CPA might be more reliable in evaluation of BI. CPA provided complementary information to CXA and CDA. KEY POINTS: • Clivopalate angle has a high diagnostic value for basilar invagination. • Clivopalate angle demonstrates high inter-reader agreement than does clivoaxial angle or clivodens angle. • Clivopalate angle provides complementary information to clivoaxial angle and clivodens angle. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-018-5972-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6554245 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65542452019-06-21 Clivopalate angle: a new diagnostic method for basilar invagination at magnetic resonance imaging Ma, Lichao Guo, Liuji Li, Xiaodan Qin, Jie He, Wenle Xiao, Xiang Lu, Lijun Xu, Yikai Wu, Yuankui Eur Radiol Head and Neck OBJECTIVES: To investigate the diagnostic value of clivopalate angle (CPA) for basilar invagination (BI) at magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: In this retrospective case-control study, CPA, clivodens angle (CDA), and clivoaxial angle (CXA) were measured on midsagittal MR images from 112 patients with BI (22 men; mean age, 43.9 years ± 13.1 years; range, 21–79 years) and 200 control subjects (57 men; mean age, 47.1 years ± 13.3 years; range, 20–80 years). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), linear regression, Mann-Whitney U test, binary logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Clivopalate angle showed better inter-observer agreement (ICC = 0.951) than CXA (0.867) or CDA (0.853). CPA significantly correlated with CXA (R = 0.811, p < 0.001) and CDA (R = 0.716, p < 0.001). Patients with BI had a significantly smaller CPA (45.9° ± 9.9°) than control subjects (61.9° ± 6.2°) (p < 0.001). With the optimal cutoff value of 53.5°, CPA had a sensitivity of 0.839 (94/112) and a specificity of 0.915 (183/200). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.937 (95% CI, 0.911–0.963) for CPA, which was similar to that of CXA (AUC, 0.957; 95% CI, 0.936–0.978) or CDA (AUC, 0.925; 95% CI, 0.892–0.957). The combination of CPA and CDA or CXA showed a higher diagnostic value than CDA or CXA alone. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic performance of CPA was similar to that of CXA or CDA, but CPA might be more reliable in evaluation of BI. CPA provided complementary information to CXA and CDA. KEY POINTS: • Clivopalate angle has a high diagnostic value for basilar invagination. • Clivopalate angle demonstrates high inter-reader agreement than does clivoaxial angle or clivodens angle. • Clivopalate angle provides complementary information to clivoaxial angle and clivodens angle. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-018-5972-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-02-08 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6554245/ /pubmed/30820721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5972-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Head and Neck Ma, Lichao Guo, Liuji Li, Xiaodan Qin, Jie He, Wenle Xiao, Xiang Lu, Lijun Xu, Yikai Wu, Yuankui Clivopalate angle: a new diagnostic method for basilar invagination at magnetic resonance imaging |
title | Clivopalate angle: a new diagnostic method for basilar invagination at magnetic resonance imaging |
title_full | Clivopalate angle: a new diagnostic method for basilar invagination at magnetic resonance imaging |
title_fullStr | Clivopalate angle: a new diagnostic method for basilar invagination at magnetic resonance imaging |
title_full_unstemmed | Clivopalate angle: a new diagnostic method for basilar invagination at magnetic resonance imaging |
title_short | Clivopalate angle: a new diagnostic method for basilar invagination at magnetic resonance imaging |
title_sort | clivopalate angle: a new diagnostic method for basilar invagination at magnetic resonance imaging |
topic | Head and Neck |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6554245/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30820721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5972-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT malichao clivopalateangleanewdiagnosticmethodforbasilarinvaginationatmagneticresonanceimaging AT guoliuji clivopalateangleanewdiagnosticmethodforbasilarinvaginationatmagneticresonanceimaging AT lixiaodan clivopalateangleanewdiagnosticmethodforbasilarinvaginationatmagneticresonanceimaging AT qinjie clivopalateangleanewdiagnosticmethodforbasilarinvaginationatmagneticresonanceimaging AT hewenle clivopalateangleanewdiagnosticmethodforbasilarinvaginationatmagneticresonanceimaging AT xiaoxiang clivopalateangleanewdiagnosticmethodforbasilarinvaginationatmagneticresonanceimaging AT lulijun clivopalateangleanewdiagnosticmethodforbasilarinvaginationatmagneticresonanceimaging AT xuyikai clivopalateangleanewdiagnosticmethodforbasilarinvaginationatmagneticresonanceimaging AT wuyuankui clivopalateangleanewdiagnosticmethodforbasilarinvaginationatmagneticresonanceimaging |