Cargando…

Clivopalate angle: a new diagnostic method for basilar invagination at magnetic resonance imaging

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the diagnostic value of clivopalate angle (CPA) for basilar invagination (BI) at magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: In this retrospective case-control study, CPA, clivodens angle (CDA), and clivoaxial angle (CXA) were measured on midsagittal MR images from 112 pati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ma, Lichao, Guo, Liuji, Li, Xiaodan, Qin, Jie, He, Wenle, Xiao, Xiang, Lu, Lijun, Xu, Yikai, Wu, Yuankui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6554245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30820721
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5972-3
_version_ 1783424931385573376
author Ma, Lichao
Guo, Liuji
Li, Xiaodan
Qin, Jie
He, Wenle
Xiao, Xiang
Lu, Lijun
Xu, Yikai
Wu, Yuankui
author_facet Ma, Lichao
Guo, Liuji
Li, Xiaodan
Qin, Jie
He, Wenle
Xiao, Xiang
Lu, Lijun
Xu, Yikai
Wu, Yuankui
author_sort Ma, Lichao
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To investigate the diagnostic value of clivopalate angle (CPA) for basilar invagination (BI) at magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: In this retrospective case-control study, CPA, clivodens angle (CDA), and clivoaxial angle (CXA) were measured on midsagittal MR images from 112 patients with BI (22 men; mean age, 43.9 years ± 13.1 years; range, 21–79 years) and 200 control subjects (57 men; mean age, 47.1 years ± 13.3 years; range, 20–80 years). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), linear regression, Mann-Whitney U test, binary logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Clivopalate angle showed better inter-observer agreement (ICC = 0.951) than CXA (0.867) or CDA (0.853). CPA significantly correlated with CXA (R = 0.811, p < 0.001) and CDA (R = 0.716, p < 0.001). Patients with BI had a significantly smaller CPA (45.9° ± 9.9°) than control subjects (61.9° ± 6.2°) (p < 0.001). With the optimal cutoff value of 53.5°, CPA had a sensitivity of 0.839 (94/112) and a specificity of 0.915 (183/200). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.937 (95% CI, 0.911–0.963) for CPA, which was similar to that of CXA (AUC, 0.957; 95% CI, 0.936–0.978) or CDA (AUC, 0.925; 95% CI, 0.892–0.957). The combination of CPA and CDA or CXA showed a higher diagnostic value than CDA or CXA alone. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic performance of CPA was similar to that of CXA or CDA, but CPA might be more reliable in evaluation of BI. CPA provided complementary information to CXA and CDA. KEY POINTS: • Clivopalate angle has a high diagnostic value for basilar invagination. • Clivopalate angle demonstrates high inter-reader agreement than does clivoaxial angle or clivodens angle. • Clivopalate angle provides complementary information to clivoaxial angle and clivodens angle. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-018-5972-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6554245
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65542452019-06-21 Clivopalate angle: a new diagnostic method for basilar invagination at magnetic resonance imaging Ma, Lichao Guo, Liuji Li, Xiaodan Qin, Jie He, Wenle Xiao, Xiang Lu, Lijun Xu, Yikai Wu, Yuankui Eur Radiol Head and Neck OBJECTIVES: To investigate the diagnostic value of clivopalate angle (CPA) for basilar invagination (BI) at magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: In this retrospective case-control study, CPA, clivodens angle (CDA), and clivoaxial angle (CXA) were measured on midsagittal MR images from 112 patients with BI (22 men; mean age, 43.9 years ± 13.1 years; range, 21–79 years) and 200 control subjects (57 men; mean age, 47.1 years ± 13.3 years; range, 20–80 years). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), linear regression, Mann-Whitney U test, binary logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Clivopalate angle showed better inter-observer agreement (ICC = 0.951) than CXA (0.867) or CDA (0.853). CPA significantly correlated with CXA (R = 0.811, p < 0.001) and CDA (R = 0.716, p < 0.001). Patients with BI had a significantly smaller CPA (45.9° ± 9.9°) than control subjects (61.9° ± 6.2°) (p < 0.001). With the optimal cutoff value of 53.5°, CPA had a sensitivity of 0.839 (94/112) and a specificity of 0.915 (183/200). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.937 (95% CI, 0.911–0.963) for CPA, which was similar to that of CXA (AUC, 0.957; 95% CI, 0.936–0.978) or CDA (AUC, 0.925; 95% CI, 0.892–0.957). The combination of CPA and CDA or CXA showed a higher diagnostic value than CDA or CXA alone. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic performance of CPA was similar to that of CXA or CDA, but CPA might be more reliable in evaluation of BI. CPA provided complementary information to CXA and CDA. KEY POINTS: • Clivopalate angle has a high diagnostic value for basilar invagination. • Clivopalate angle demonstrates high inter-reader agreement than does clivoaxial angle or clivodens angle. • Clivopalate angle provides complementary information to clivoaxial angle and clivodens angle. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-018-5972-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-02-08 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6554245/ /pubmed/30820721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5972-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Head and Neck
Ma, Lichao
Guo, Liuji
Li, Xiaodan
Qin, Jie
He, Wenle
Xiao, Xiang
Lu, Lijun
Xu, Yikai
Wu, Yuankui
Clivopalate angle: a new diagnostic method for basilar invagination at magnetic resonance imaging
title Clivopalate angle: a new diagnostic method for basilar invagination at magnetic resonance imaging
title_full Clivopalate angle: a new diagnostic method for basilar invagination at magnetic resonance imaging
title_fullStr Clivopalate angle: a new diagnostic method for basilar invagination at magnetic resonance imaging
title_full_unstemmed Clivopalate angle: a new diagnostic method for basilar invagination at magnetic resonance imaging
title_short Clivopalate angle: a new diagnostic method for basilar invagination at magnetic resonance imaging
title_sort clivopalate angle: a new diagnostic method for basilar invagination at magnetic resonance imaging
topic Head and Neck
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6554245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30820721
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5972-3
work_keys_str_mv AT malichao clivopalateangleanewdiagnosticmethodforbasilarinvaginationatmagneticresonanceimaging
AT guoliuji clivopalateangleanewdiagnosticmethodforbasilarinvaginationatmagneticresonanceimaging
AT lixiaodan clivopalateangleanewdiagnosticmethodforbasilarinvaginationatmagneticresonanceimaging
AT qinjie clivopalateangleanewdiagnosticmethodforbasilarinvaginationatmagneticresonanceimaging
AT hewenle clivopalateangleanewdiagnosticmethodforbasilarinvaginationatmagneticresonanceimaging
AT xiaoxiang clivopalateangleanewdiagnosticmethodforbasilarinvaginationatmagneticresonanceimaging
AT lulijun clivopalateangleanewdiagnosticmethodforbasilarinvaginationatmagneticresonanceimaging
AT xuyikai clivopalateangleanewdiagnosticmethodforbasilarinvaginationatmagneticresonanceimaging
AT wuyuankui clivopalateangleanewdiagnosticmethodforbasilarinvaginationatmagneticresonanceimaging