Cargando…

Multi-detector CT imaging: impact of virtual tube current reduction and sparse sampling on detection of vertebral fractures

PURPOSE: To systematically evaluate the effects of virtual tube current reduction and sparse sampling on image quality and vertebral fracture diagnostics in multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In routine MDCT scans of 35 patients (80.0% females, 70.6 ± 14.2 years, 65.7%...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sollmann, Nico, Mei, Kai, Hedderich, Dennis M., Maegerlein, Christian, Kopp, Felix K., Löffler, Maximilian T., Zimmer, Claus, Rummeny, Ernst J., Kirschke, Jan S., Baum, Thomas, Noël, Peter B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6554251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30903337
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06090-2
_version_ 1783424932782276608
author Sollmann, Nico
Mei, Kai
Hedderich, Dennis M.
Maegerlein, Christian
Kopp, Felix K.
Löffler, Maximilian T.
Zimmer, Claus
Rummeny, Ernst J.
Kirschke, Jan S.
Baum, Thomas
Noël, Peter B.
author_facet Sollmann, Nico
Mei, Kai
Hedderich, Dennis M.
Maegerlein, Christian
Kopp, Felix K.
Löffler, Maximilian T.
Zimmer, Claus
Rummeny, Ernst J.
Kirschke, Jan S.
Baum, Thomas
Noël, Peter B.
author_sort Sollmann, Nico
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To systematically evaluate the effects of virtual tube current reduction and sparse sampling on image quality and vertebral fracture diagnostics in multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In routine MDCT scans of 35 patients (80.0% females, 70.6 ± 14.2 years, 65.7% showing vertebral fractures), reduced radiation doses were retrospectively simulated by virtually lowering tube currents and applying sparse sampling, considering 50%, 25%, and 10% of the original tube current and projections, respectively. Two readers evaluated items of image quality and presence of vertebral fractures. Readout between the evaluations in the original images and those with virtually lowered tube currents or sparse sampling were compared. RESULTS: A significant difference was revealed between the evaluations of image quality between MDCT with virtually lowered tube current and sparse-sampled MDCT (p < 0.001). Sparse-sampled data with only 25% of original projections still showed good to very good overall image quality and contrast of vertebrae as well as minimal artifacts. There were no missed fractures in sparse-sampled MDCT with 50% reduction of projections, and clinically acceptable determination of fracture age was possible in MDCT with 75% reduction of projections, in contrast to MDCT with 50% or 75% virtual tube current reduction, respectively. CONCLUSION: Sparse-sampled MDCT provides adequate image quality and diagnostic accuracy for vertebral fracture detection with 50% of original projections in contrast to corresponding MDCT with lowered tube current. Thus, sparse sampling is a promising technique for dose reductions in MDCT that could be introduced in future generations of scanners. KEY POINTS: • MDCT with a reduction of projection numbers of 50% still showed high diagnostic accuracy without any missed vertebral fractures. • Clinically acceptable determination of vertebral fracture age was possible in MDCT with a reduction of projection numbers of 75%. • With sparse sampling, higher reductions in radiation exposure can be achieved without compromised image or diagnostic quality in routine MDCT of the spine as compared to MDCT with reduced tube currents. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-019-06090-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6554251
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65542512019-06-21 Multi-detector CT imaging: impact of virtual tube current reduction and sparse sampling on detection of vertebral fractures Sollmann, Nico Mei, Kai Hedderich, Dennis M. Maegerlein, Christian Kopp, Felix K. Löffler, Maximilian T. Zimmer, Claus Rummeny, Ernst J. Kirschke, Jan S. Baum, Thomas Noël, Peter B. Eur Radiol Computed Tomography PURPOSE: To systematically evaluate the effects of virtual tube current reduction and sparse sampling on image quality and vertebral fracture diagnostics in multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In routine MDCT scans of 35 patients (80.0% females, 70.6 ± 14.2 years, 65.7% showing vertebral fractures), reduced radiation doses were retrospectively simulated by virtually lowering tube currents and applying sparse sampling, considering 50%, 25%, and 10% of the original tube current and projections, respectively. Two readers evaluated items of image quality and presence of vertebral fractures. Readout between the evaluations in the original images and those with virtually lowered tube currents or sparse sampling were compared. RESULTS: A significant difference was revealed between the evaluations of image quality between MDCT with virtually lowered tube current and sparse-sampled MDCT (p < 0.001). Sparse-sampled data with only 25% of original projections still showed good to very good overall image quality and contrast of vertebrae as well as minimal artifacts. There were no missed fractures in sparse-sampled MDCT with 50% reduction of projections, and clinically acceptable determination of fracture age was possible in MDCT with 75% reduction of projections, in contrast to MDCT with 50% or 75% virtual tube current reduction, respectively. CONCLUSION: Sparse-sampled MDCT provides adequate image quality and diagnostic accuracy for vertebral fracture detection with 50% of original projections in contrast to corresponding MDCT with lowered tube current. Thus, sparse sampling is a promising technique for dose reductions in MDCT that could be introduced in future generations of scanners. KEY POINTS: • MDCT with a reduction of projection numbers of 50% still showed high diagnostic accuracy without any missed vertebral fractures. • Clinically acceptable determination of vertebral fracture age was possible in MDCT with a reduction of projection numbers of 75%. • With sparse sampling, higher reductions in radiation exposure can be achieved without compromised image or diagnostic quality in routine MDCT of the spine as compared to MDCT with reduced tube currents. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-019-06090-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-03-22 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6554251/ /pubmed/30903337 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06090-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 OpenAccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Computed Tomography
Sollmann, Nico
Mei, Kai
Hedderich, Dennis M.
Maegerlein, Christian
Kopp, Felix K.
Löffler, Maximilian T.
Zimmer, Claus
Rummeny, Ernst J.
Kirschke, Jan S.
Baum, Thomas
Noël, Peter B.
Multi-detector CT imaging: impact of virtual tube current reduction and sparse sampling on detection of vertebral fractures
title Multi-detector CT imaging: impact of virtual tube current reduction and sparse sampling on detection of vertebral fractures
title_full Multi-detector CT imaging: impact of virtual tube current reduction and sparse sampling on detection of vertebral fractures
title_fullStr Multi-detector CT imaging: impact of virtual tube current reduction and sparse sampling on detection of vertebral fractures
title_full_unstemmed Multi-detector CT imaging: impact of virtual tube current reduction and sparse sampling on detection of vertebral fractures
title_short Multi-detector CT imaging: impact of virtual tube current reduction and sparse sampling on detection of vertebral fractures
title_sort multi-detector ct imaging: impact of virtual tube current reduction and sparse sampling on detection of vertebral fractures
topic Computed Tomography
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6554251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30903337
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06090-2
work_keys_str_mv AT sollmannnico multidetectorctimagingimpactofvirtualtubecurrentreductionandsparsesamplingondetectionofvertebralfractures
AT meikai multidetectorctimagingimpactofvirtualtubecurrentreductionandsparsesamplingondetectionofvertebralfractures
AT hedderichdennism multidetectorctimagingimpactofvirtualtubecurrentreductionandsparsesamplingondetectionofvertebralfractures
AT maegerleinchristian multidetectorctimagingimpactofvirtualtubecurrentreductionandsparsesamplingondetectionofvertebralfractures
AT koppfelixk multidetectorctimagingimpactofvirtualtubecurrentreductionandsparsesamplingondetectionofvertebralfractures
AT lofflermaximiliant multidetectorctimagingimpactofvirtualtubecurrentreductionandsparsesamplingondetectionofvertebralfractures
AT zimmerclaus multidetectorctimagingimpactofvirtualtubecurrentreductionandsparsesamplingondetectionofvertebralfractures
AT rummenyernstj multidetectorctimagingimpactofvirtualtubecurrentreductionandsparsesamplingondetectionofvertebralfractures
AT kirschkejans multidetectorctimagingimpactofvirtualtubecurrentreductionandsparsesamplingondetectionofvertebralfractures
AT baumthomas multidetectorctimagingimpactofvirtualtubecurrentreductionandsparsesamplingondetectionofvertebralfractures
AT noelpeterb multidetectorctimagingimpactofvirtualtubecurrentreductionandsparsesamplingondetectionofvertebralfractures