Cargando…
Homo sapiens, Chimpanzees and the Enigma of Language
OBJECTIVES: The present study explores the hypothesis that the anatomical bone structures of the oral cavity have probably evolved under the influence of language function. The possible changes have been evaluated by comparing two close species essentially differentiated from each other by spoken la...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6555268/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31213975 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00558 |
_version_ | 1783425124204019712 |
---|---|
author | Bermejo-Fenoll, Ambrosio Panchón-Ruíz, Alfonso Sánchez del Campo, Francisco |
author_facet | Bermejo-Fenoll, Ambrosio Panchón-Ruíz, Alfonso Sánchez del Campo, Francisco |
author_sort | Bermejo-Fenoll, Ambrosio |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The present study explores the hypothesis that the anatomical bone structures of the oral cavity have probably evolved under the influence of language function. The possible changes have been evaluated by comparing two close species essentially differentiated from each other by spoken language. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty dry skulls and 20 mandibles of modern Caucasians were compared with 12 dry skulls and 12 mandibles of chimpanzees, with the analysis of 37 variables and the definition of new anatomical parameters. RESULTS: A number of highly significant differences were found between humans and chimpanzees. The human temporomandibular joint is comparatively less flat and has a more limited excursive movement range, with structural elements that seem to be lighter. A significant difference is noted in mandibular alveolar vergency and in the internal slope of the mandibular symphysis where the oral cavity’s morphology is modified, thereby increasing the free space for tongue movements in humans. The chin, which is unique to the human species, is quantified through the external slope of the mandibular symphysis with a lesser angle in humans. DISCUSSION: It is obvious that there are differences between humans and chimpanzees in the bone morphology of the oral cavity structures. This has been confirmed with the analysis of new variables. Together with other factors (bipedalism, habits, and genetics) speech in humans must have played an important role in the aforementioned differences between humans and chimpanzees. The number of mandibular movements involved in speech is far greater than those used in chewing, which must have conditioned the evolution of the oral structures implicated in the development of language. On average, humans weigh 70 kg and chimpanzees 44 kg. However, the majority of the variables studied in skulls and mandibles are greater in chimpanzees, which suggests that the evolution of the oral zone in humans has suffered a reduction in size with changes in shape. The refinement of the supralaryngeal vocal tract in the human species must have co-evolved with speech fairly recently. The human skull has temporomandibular joints that are comparatively less flat with a more limited movement. There is a greater lingual space and there is also a chin that suggests a muscular stimulant. This leads to the conclusion that, at least in part, speech is behind all these changes, although it is difficult to establish a cause-effect relationship. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6555268 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65552682019-06-18 Homo sapiens, Chimpanzees and the Enigma of Language Bermejo-Fenoll, Ambrosio Panchón-Ruíz, Alfonso Sánchez del Campo, Francisco Front Neurosci Neuroscience OBJECTIVES: The present study explores the hypothesis that the anatomical bone structures of the oral cavity have probably evolved under the influence of language function. The possible changes have been evaluated by comparing two close species essentially differentiated from each other by spoken language. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty dry skulls and 20 mandibles of modern Caucasians were compared with 12 dry skulls and 12 mandibles of chimpanzees, with the analysis of 37 variables and the definition of new anatomical parameters. RESULTS: A number of highly significant differences were found between humans and chimpanzees. The human temporomandibular joint is comparatively less flat and has a more limited excursive movement range, with structural elements that seem to be lighter. A significant difference is noted in mandibular alveolar vergency and in the internal slope of the mandibular symphysis where the oral cavity’s morphology is modified, thereby increasing the free space for tongue movements in humans. The chin, which is unique to the human species, is quantified through the external slope of the mandibular symphysis with a lesser angle in humans. DISCUSSION: It is obvious that there are differences between humans and chimpanzees in the bone morphology of the oral cavity structures. This has been confirmed with the analysis of new variables. Together with other factors (bipedalism, habits, and genetics) speech in humans must have played an important role in the aforementioned differences between humans and chimpanzees. The number of mandibular movements involved in speech is far greater than those used in chewing, which must have conditioned the evolution of the oral structures implicated in the development of language. On average, humans weigh 70 kg and chimpanzees 44 kg. However, the majority of the variables studied in skulls and mandibles are greater in chimpanzees, which suggests that the evolution of the oral zone in humans has suffered a reduction in size with changes in shape. The refinement of the supralaryngeal vocal tract in the human species must have co-evolved with speech fairly recently. The human skull has temporomandibular joints that are comparatively less flat with a more limited movement. There is a greater lingual space and there is also a chin that suggests a muscular stimulant. This leads to the conclusion that, at least in part, speech is behind all these changes, although it is difficult to establish a cause-effect relationship. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6555268/ /pubmed/31213975 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00558 Text en Copyright © 2019 Bermejo-Fenoll, Panchón-Ruíz and Sánchez del Campo. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Bermejo-Fenoll, Ambrosio Panchón-Ruíz, Alfonso Sánchez del Campo, Francisco Homo sapiens, Chimpanzees and the Enigma of Language |
title | Homo sapiens, Chimpanzees and the Enigma of Language |
title_full | Homo sapiens, Chimpanzees and the Enigma of Language |
title_fullStr | Homo sapiens, Chimpanzees and the Enigma of Language |
title_full_unstemmed | Homo sapiens, Chimpanzees and the Enigma of Language |
title_short | Homo sapiens, Chimpanzees and the Enigma of Language |
title_sort | homo sapiens, chimpanzees and the enigma of language |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6555268/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31213975 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00558 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bermejofenollambrosio homosapienschimpanzeesandtheenigmaoflanguage AT panchonruizalfonso homosapienschimpanzeesandtheenigmaoflanguage AT sanchezdelcampofrancisco homosapienschimpanzeesandtheenigmaoflanguage |