Cargando…

An In Vitro Comparative Evaluation of Distribution of Three Different Sealers by Single-Cone Obturation Technique

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the distribution of sealer at different levels of the root canal using three different sealers in a single-cone obturation technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty freshly extracted mandibular premolar teeth were selected and access opening was performed. W...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Palanivelu, Chandrika Ramanathan, Ravi, Vaiyapuri, Sivakumar, Arthanarieswaran Andamuthu, Sivakumar, Jambai Sampathkumar, Prasad, Anjaneya Shiva, Arthanari, Kaneesh Karthik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6555329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31198383
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JPBS.JPBS_64_19
_version_ 1783425133128450048
author Palanivelu, Chandrika Ramanathan
Ravi, Vaiyapuri
Sivakumar, Arthanarieswaran Andamuthu
Sivakumar, Jambai Sampathkumar
Prasad, Anjaneya Shiva
Arthanari, Kaneesh Karthik
author_facet Palanivelu, Chandrika Ramanathan
Ravi, Vaiyapuri
Sivakumar, Arthanarieswaran Andamuthu
Sivakumar, Jambai Sampathkumar
Prasad, Anjaneya Shiva
Arthanari, Kaneesh Karthik
author_sort Palanivelu, Chandrika Ramanathan
collection PubMed
description AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the distribution of sealer at different levels of the root canal using three different sealers in a single-cone obturation technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty freshly extracted mandibular premolar teeth were selected and access opening was performed. Working length was determined. Cleaning and shaping were done till 25 size K file followed by ProTaper till F2 size. Teeth were then obturated with matching gutta-percha points with the following sealers: Group I, 10 teeth with zinc oxide eugenol sealer; Group II, 10 teeth with AH plus sealer; and Group III, 10 teeth with NanoSeal-S sealer. Teeth were cross sectioned at 3 and 6 mm from the apex. Color photographs of sections were taken at a magnification of ×40 using a camera connected to a stereo-operating microscope and the images were transferred to a computer. Sealer distribution was observed and the canal perimeters coated or uncoated with the sealer can be calculated using a computer digital imaging system. RESULTS: Of the three groups, zinc oxide eugenol showed least sealer distribution. AH Plus and Nanoseal-S showed no significant difference between the distribution at the 3- and 6-mm levels. CONCLUSION: Both AH Plus and Nanoseal-S showed excellent sealer distribution when compared to zinc oxide eugenol.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6555329
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65553292019-06-13 An In Vitro Comparative Evaluation of Distribution of Three Different Sealers by Single-Cone Obturation Technique Palanivelu, Chandrika Ramanathan Ravi, Vaiyapuri Sivakumar, Arthanarieswaran Andamuthu Sivakumar, Jambai Sampathkumar Prasad, Anjaneya Shiva Arthanari, Kaneesh Karthik J Pharm Bioallied Sci Original Article AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the distribution of sealer at different levels of the root canal using three different sealers in a single-cone obturation technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty freshly extracted mandibular premolar teeth were selected and access opening was performed. Working length was determined. Cleaning and shaping were done till 25 size K file followed by ProTaper till F2 size. Teeth were then obturated with matching gutta-percha points with the following sealers: Group I, 10 teeth with zinc oxide eugenol sealer; Group II, 10 teeth with AH plus sealer; and Group III, 10 teeth with NanoSeal-S sealer. Teeth were cross sectioned at 3 and 6 mm from the apex. Color photographs of sections were taken at a magnification of ×40 using a camera connected to a stereo-operating microscope and the images were transferred to a computer. Sealer distribution was observed and the canal perimeters coated or uncoated with the sealer can be calculated using a computer digital imaging system. RESULTS: Of the three groups, zinc oxide eugenol showed least sealer distribution. AH Plus and Nanoseal-S showed no significant difference between the distribution at the 3- and 6-mm levels. CONCLUSION: Both AH Plus and Nanoseal-S showed excellent sealer distribution when compared to zinc oxide eugenol. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2019-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6555329/ /pubmed/31198383 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JPBS.JPBS_64_19 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Palanivelu, Chandrika Ramanathan
Ravi, Vaiyapuri
Sivakumar, Arthanarieswaran Andamuthu
Sivakumar, Jambai Sampathkumar
Prasad, Anjaneya Shiva
Arthanari, Kaneesh Karthik
An In Vitro Comparative Evaluation of Distribution of Three Different Sealers by Single-Cone Obturation Technique
title An In Vitro Comparative Evaluation of Distribution of Three Different Sealers by Single-Cone Obturation Technique
title_full An In Vitro Comparative Evaluation of Distribution of Three Different Sealers by Single-Cone Obturation Technique
title_fullStr An In Vitro Comparative Evaluation of Distribution of Three Different Sealers by Single-Cone Obturation Technique
title_full_unstemmed An In Vitro Comparative Evaluation of Distribution of Three Different Sealers by Single-Cone Obturation Technique
title_short An In Vitro Comparative Evaluation of Distribution of Three Different Sealers by Single-Cone Obturation Technique
title_sort in vitro comparative evaluation of distribution of three different sealers by single-cone obturation technique
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6555329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31198383
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JPBS.JPBS_64_19
work_keys_str_mv AT palaniveluchandrikaramanathan aninvitrocomparativeevaluationofdistributionofthreedifferentsealersbysingleconeobturationtechnique
AT ravivaiyapuri aninvitrocomparativeevaluationofdistributionofthreedifferentsealersbysingleconeobturationtechnique
AT sivakumararthanarieswaranandamuthu aninvitrocomparativeevaluationofdistributionofthreedifferentsealersbysingleconeobturationtechnique
AT sivakumarjambaisampathkumar aninvitrocomparativeevaluationofdistributionofthreedifferentsealersbysingleconeobturationtechnique
AT prasadanjaneyashiva aninvitrocomparativeevaluationofdistributionofthreedifferentsealersbysingleconeobturationtechnique
AT arthanarikaneeshkarthik aninvitrocomparativeevaluationofdistributionofthreedifferentsealersbysingleconeobturationtechnique
AT palaniveluchandrikaramanathan invitrocomparativeevaluationofdistributionofthreedifferentsealersbysingleconeobturationtechnique
AT ravivaiyapuri invitrocomparativeevaluationofdistributionofthreedifferentsealersbysingleconeobturationtechnique
AT sivakumararthanarieswaranandamuthu invitrocomparativeevaluationofdistributionofthreedifferentsealersbysingleconeobturationtechnique
AT sivakumarjambaisampathkumar invitrocomparativeevaluationofdistributionofthreedifferentsealersbysingleconeobturationtechnique
AT prasadanjaneyashiva invitrocomparativeevaluationofdistributionofthreedifferentsealersbysingleconeobturationtechnique
AT arthanarikaneeshkarthik invitrocomparativeevaluationofdistributionofthreedifferentsealersbysingleconeobturationtechnique