Cargando…

Clinical and Radiological Evaluation of Delayed and Early Loading of Single-Tooth Implant Placement: A 6-Month, Prospective, Randomized, Follow-up Clinical Study

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to compare delayed and early loaded single-tooth implant technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized, prospective clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the clinical and radiological parameters of delayed and early loading of single-tooth implant placement....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sekar, Santhosh, Suthanthiran, Thangakumaran, Thangavelu, Arthiie, Karupannan, Sasi Kumar, Prem, Fairlin, Rajendran, Dhivya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6555379/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31198353
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JPBS.JPBS_12_19
_version_ 1783425144978407424
author Sekar, Santhosh
Suthanthiran, Thangakumaran
Thangavelu, Arthiie
Karupannan, Sasi Kumar
Prem, Fairlin
Rajendran, Dhivya
author_facet Sekar, Santhosh
Suthanthiran, Thangakumaran
Thangavelu, Arthiie
Karupannan, Sasi Kumar
Prem, Fairlin
Rajendran, Dhivya
author_sort Sekar, Santhosh
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to compare delayed and early loaded single-tooth implant technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized, prospective clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the clinical and radiological parameters of delayed and early loading of single-tooth implant placement. Fourteen male or female patients were selected randomly, who had single tooth missing in mandibular posterior region. A delayed implant placement technique was followed in these regions. A Hi-Tech implant (Life Care Implants) was performed. The patients were divided into two groups: delayed loading group and early loading group. In delayed loading groups, implants were loaded after 3 months, and in early loading groups, implants were loaded within 7 days to 2 months. Soft tissue and radiological bone loss were assessed at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. The parameters assessed were plaque index, gingival index, probing pocket depth, thickness of peri-implant mucosa, and bone loss (radiographically). RESULTS: The results show that there was no statistical difference in indexes taken between delayed loading and early loading groups. CONCLUSION: In this study, after first 6 months there was no difference in success rate between delayed loading or early loading of implants. This study also showed that more bone loss occurred around delayed loading implants. So it can be concluded that early loading technique can be successfully practiced instead of delayed loading of implants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6555379
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65553792019-06-13 Clinical and Radiological Evaluation of Delayed and Early Loading of Single-Tooth Implant Placement: A 6-Month, Prospective, Randomized, Follow-up Clinical Study Sekar, Santhosh Suthanthiran, Thangakumaran Thangavelu, Arthiie Karupannan, Sasi Kumar Prem, Fairlin Rajendran, Dhivya J Pharm Bioallied Sci Original Article PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to compare delayed and early loaded single-tooth implant technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized, prospective clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the clinical and radiological parameters of delayed and early loading of single-tooth implant placement. Fourteen male or female patients were selected randomly, who had single tooth missing in mandibular posterior region. A delayed implant placement technique was followed in these regions. A Hi-Tech implant (Life Care Implants) was performed. The patients were divided into two groups: delayed loading group and early loading group. In delayed loading groups, implants were loaded after 3 months, and in early loading groups, implants were loaded within 7 days to 2 months. Soft tissue and radiological bone loss were assessed at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. The parameters assessed were plaque index, gingival index, probing pocket depth, thickness of peri-implant mucosa, and bone loss (radiographically). RESULTS: The results show that there was no statistical difference in indexes taken between delayed loading and early loading groups. CONCLUSION: In this study, after first 6 months there was no difference in success rate between delayed loading or early loading of implants. This study also showed that more bone loss occurred around delayed loading implants. So it can be concluded that early loading technique can be successfully practiced instead of delayed loading of implants. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2019-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6555379/ /pubmed/31198353 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JPBS.JPBS_12_19 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sekar, Santhosh
Suthanthiran, Thangakumaran
Thangavelu, Arthiie
Karupannan, Sasi Kumar
Prem, Fairlin
Rajendran, Dhivya
Clinical and Radiological Evaluation of Delayed and Early Loading of Single-Tooth Implant Placement: A 6-Month, Prospective, Randomized, Follow-up Clinical Study
title Clinical and Radiological Evaluation of Delayed and Early Loading of Single-Tooth Implant Placement: A 6-Month, Prospective, Randomized, Follow-up Clinical Study
title_full Clinical and Radiological Evaluation of Delayed and Early Loading of Single-Tooth Implant Placement: A 6-Month, Prospective, Randomized, Follow-up Clinical Study
title_fullStr Clinical and Radiological Evaluation of Delayed and Early Loading of Single-Tooth Implant Placement: A 6-Month, Prospective, Randomized, Follow-up Clinical Study
title_full_unstemmed Clinical and Radiological Evaluation of Delayed and Early Loading of Single-Tooth Implant Placement: A 6-Month, Prospective, Randomized, Follow-up Clinical Study
title_short Clinical and Radiological Evaluation of Delayed and Early Loading of Single-Tooth Implant Placement: A 6-Month, Prospective, Randomized, Follow-up Clinical Study
title_sort clinical and radiological evaluation of delayed and early loading of single-tooth implant placement: a 6-month, prospective, randomized, follow-up clinical study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6555379/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31198353
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JPBS.JPBS_12_19
work_keys_str_mv AT sekarsanthosh clinicalandradiologicalevaluationofdelayedandearlyloadingofsingletoothimplantplacementa6monthprospectiverandomizedfollowupclinicalstudy
AT suthanthiranthangakumaran clinicalandradiologicalevaluationofdelayedandearlyloadingofsingletoothimplantplacementa6monthprospectiverandomizedfollowupclinicalstudy
AT thangaveluarthiie clinicalandradiologicalevaluationofdelayedandearlyloadingofsingletoothimplantplacementa6monthprospectiverandomizedfollowupclinicalstudy
AT karupannansasikumar clinicalandradiologicalevaluationofdelayedandearlyloadingofsingletoothimplantplacementa6monthprospectiverandomizedfollowupclinicalstudy
AT premfairlin clinicalandradiologicalevaluationofdelayedandearlyloadingofsingletoothimplantplacementa6monthprospectiverandomizedfollowupclinicalstudy
AT rajendrandhivya clinicalandradiologicalevaluationofdelayedandearlyloadingofsingletoothimplantplacementa6monthprospectiverandomizedfollowupclinicalstudy