Cargando…
Comparative Evaluation of Implant Designs: Influence of Diameter, Length, and Taper on Stress and Strain in the Mandibular Segment—A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis
INTRODUCTION: Success or failure of dental implants depends on the amount of stress transferred to the surrounding bone. Increased amount of loading to the bone through implant cause failure, whereas decrease in the amount of loading to the bone causes improved success rate of implants. Biomechanica...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6555380/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31198367 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JPBS.JPBS_29_19 |
_version_ | 1783425145215385600 |
---|---|
author | Raaj, Gowthama Manimaran, Pulliappan Kumar, Chandran Dhinesh Sadan, Duraisamy Sai Abirami, Mathivanan |
author_facet | Raaj, Gowthama Manimaran, Pulliappan Kumar, Chandran Dhinesh Sadan, Duraisamy Sai Abirami, Mathivanan |
author_sort | Raaj, Gowthama |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Success or failure of dental implants depends on the amount of stress transferred to the surrounding bone. Increased amount of loading to the bone through implant cause failure, whereas decrease in the amount of loading to the bone causes improved success rate of implants. Biomechanical interaction between implant and bone decides the long-term function or prognosis of dental implant system. AIM AND OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to evaluate the influence of implant length and diameter on stress distribution, to understand the stress distribution around bone–implant interface, and to understand the response of bone under axial and non-axial loading conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Finite element three-dimensional mandibular model was made using cone beam computed tomography of patient with completely edentulous mandible, and in that model five posterior bone segments were selected. NobelReplace Select Tapered implants with diameters and lengths 3.5 × 10 mm, 4.3 × 10 mm, 3.5 × 11.5 mm, and 4.3 × 11.5 mm, respectively were selected and three dimensionally modeled using Creo 2.0 Parametric Pro/E software. Bone and implant models were assembled as 20 models and finite element analysis was performed using ANSYS Workbench v17.0 under axial and non-axial loads. RESULT: Under axial and non-axial loads, 3.5 × 10 mm implant showed maximum von Mises stress and strain in both cortical and cancellous bone whereas implant with diameter and length 4.3 × 11.5 mm showed minimum von Mises stress and strain in both cortical and cancellous bone. CONCLUSION: In axial and non-axial loads, amount of stress distribution around implant–bone interface is influenced by diameter and length of implant in cortical and cancellous bone, respectively. Increased diameter of the implant produces the minimum stress in cortical bone. Increased length of the implant produces the minimum stress in cancellous bone. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6555380 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65553802019-06-13 Comparative Evaluation of Implant Designs: Influence of Diameter, Length, and Taper on Stress and Strain in the Mandibular Segment—A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis Raaj, Gowthama Manimaran, Pulliappan Kumar, Chandran Dhinesh Sadan, Duraisamy Sai Abirami, Mathivanan J Pharm Bioallied Sci Original Article INTRODUCTION: Success or failure of dental implants depends on the amount of stress transferred to the surrounding bone. Increased amount of loading to the bone through implant cause failure, whereas decrease in the amount of loading to the bone causes improved success rate of implants. Biomechanical interaction between implant and bone decides the long-term function or prognosis of dental implant system. AIM AND OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to evaluate the influence of implant length and diameter on stress distribution, to understand the stress distribution around bone–implant interface, and to understand the response of bone under axial and non-axial loading conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Finite element three-dimensional mandibular model was made using cone beam computed tomography of patient with completely edentulous mandible, and in that model five posterior bone segments were selected. NobelReplace Select Tapered implants with diameters and lengths 3.5 × 10 mm, 4.3 × 10 mm, 3.5 × 11.5 mm, and 4.3 × 11.5 mm, respectively were selected and three dimensionally modeled using Creo 2.0 Parametric Pro/E software. Bone and implant models were assembled as 20 models and finite element analysis was performed using ANSYS Workbench v17.0 under axial and non-axial loads. RESULT: Under axial and non-axial loads, 3.5 × 10 mm implant showed maximum von Mises stress and strain in both cortical and cancellous bone whereas implant with diameter and length 4.3 × 11.5 mm showed minimum von Mises stress and strain in both cortical and cancellous bone. CONCLUSION: In axial and non-axial loads, amount of stress distribution around implant–bone interface is influenced by diameter and length of implant in cortical and cancellous bone, respectively. Increased diameter of the implant produces the minimum stress in cortical bone. Increased length of the implant produces the minimum stress in cancellous bone. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2019-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6555380/ /pubmed/31198367 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JPBS.JPBS_29_19 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Raaj, Gowthama Manimaran, Pulliappan Kumar, Chandran Dhinesh Sadan, Duraisamy Sai Abirami, Mathivanan Comparative Evaluation of Implant Designs: Influence of Diameter, Length, and Taper on Stress and Strain in the Mandibular Segment—A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis |
title | Comparative Evaluation of Implant Designs: Influence of Diameter, Length, and Taper on Stress and Strain in the Mandibular Segment—A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis |
title_full | Comparative Evaluation of Implant Designs: Influence of Diameter, Length, and Taper on Stress and Strain in the Mandibular Segment—A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparative Evaluation of Implant Designs: Influence of Diameter, Length, and Taper on Stress and Strain in the Mandibular Segment—A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Evaluation of Implant Designs: Influence of Diameter, Length, and Taper on Stress and Strain in the Mandibular Segment—A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis |
title_short | Comparative Evaluation of Implant Designs: Influence of Diameter, Length, and Taper on Stress and Strain in the Mandibular Segment—A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of implant designs: influence of diameter, length, and taper on stress and strain in the mandibular segment—a three-dimensional finite element analysis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6555380/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31198367 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JPBS.JPBS_29_19 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT raajgowthama comparativeevaluationofimplantdesignsinfluenceofdiameterlengthandtaperonstressandstraininthemandibularsegmentathreedimensionalfiniteelementanalysis AT manimaranpulliappan comparativeevaluationofimplantdesignsinfluenceofdiameterlengthandtaperonstressandstraininthemandibularsegmentathreedimensionalfiniteelementanalysis AT kumarchandrandhinesh comparativeevaluationofimplantdesignsinfluenceofdiameterlengthandtaperonstressandstraininthemandibularsegmentathreedimensionalfiniteelementanalysis AT sadanduraisamysai comparativeevaluationofimplantdesignsinfluenceofdiameterlengthandtaperonstressandstraininthemandibularsegmentathreedimensionalfiniteelementanalysis AT abiramimathivanan comparativeevaluationofimplantdesignsinfluenceofdiameterlengthandtaperonstressandstraininthemandibularsegmentathreedimensionalfiniteelementanalysis |