Cargando…

Feasibility of Spinal Anesthesia Placement Using Automated Interpretation of Lumbar Ultrasound Images: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the efficacy of spinal anesthesia administration by resident physicians when using an ultrasound system with automated neuraxial landmark detection capabilities. METHODS: 150 patients were enrolled in this trial. Anesthesiology residents placed spinals in subjects un...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singla, Priyanka, Dixon, Adam J, Sheeran, Jessica L, Scalzo, David, Mauldin, Frank W, Tiouririne, Mohamed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6555430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31179158
http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2155-6148.1000878
_version_ 1783425151142985728
author Singla, Priyanka
Dixon, Adam J
Sheeran, Jessica L
Scalzo, David
Mauldin, Frank W
Tiouririne, Mohamed
author_facet Singla, Priyanka
Dixon, Adam J
Sheeran, Jessica L
Scalzo, David
Mauldin, Frank W
Tiouririne, Mohamed
author_sort Singla, Priyanka
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the efficacy of spinal anesthesia administration by resident physicians when using an ultrasound system with automated neuraxial landmark detection capabilities. METHODS: 150 patients were enrolled in this trial. Anesthesiology residents placed spinals in subjects undergoing scheduled cesarean delivery using one of three techniques to identify neuraxial landmarks: palpation, ultrasound, or combined palpation and ultrasound. Ultrasound was performed using a handheld system that automatically identified neuraxial landmarks (e.g. midline, intervertebral spaces). All residents watched a 10-minute video and received 20 minutes of hands-on training prior to participating in the study. First insertion success rate was the primary end point. RESULTS: Among all patients, use of ultrasound resulted in a 11% greater first-insertion success rate (RR: 1.11 [0.85–1.47], p=0.431), a 15% reduction in needle insertions (RR: 0.85, p=0.052), and a 26% decrease in needle passes (RR: 0.74, p=0.070). In obese patients of BMI ≥ 30 kg/m(2), use of ultrasound resulted in 26% greater first-insertion success rates (RR: 1.26, p=0.187), a 21% decrease in needle insertions (RR: 0.79, p=0.025), a 38% decrease in needle passes (RR: 0.62, p=0.030), and a 75% decrease in patients reporting neutral or low patient satisfaction with anesthesia administration (RR: 0.25, p=0.004). DISCUSSION: Resident anesthesiologists competently utilized the ultrasound system after receiving minimal training. Technical endpoints and patient satisfaction trended towards improvement when ultrasound was used prior to spinal placement, with stronger trends observed in obese patients. Additional study is required to fully characterize the impact of the ultrasound system on clinical efficacy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6555430
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65554302019-06-07 Feasibility of Spinal Anesthesia Placement Using Automated Interpretation of Lumbar Ultrasound Images: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Singla, Priyanka Dixon, Adam J Sheeran, Jessica L Scalzo, David Mauldin, Frank W Tiouririne, Mohamed J Anesth Clin Res Article BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the efficacy of spinal anesthesia administration by resident physicians when using an ultrasound system with automated neuraxial landmark detection capabilities. METHODS: 150 patients were enrolled in this trial. Anesthesiology residents placed spinals in subjects undergoing scheduled cesarean delivery using one of three techniques to identify neuraxial landmarks: palpation, ultrasound, or combined palpation and ultrasound. Ultrasound was performed using a handheld system that automatically identified neuraxial landmarks (e.g. midline, intervertebral spaces). All residents watched a 10-minute video and received 20 minutes of hands-on training prior to participating in the study. First insertion success rate was the primary end point. RESULTS: Among all patients, use of ultrasound resulted in a 11% greater first-insertion success rate (RR: 1.11 [0.85–1.47], p=0.431), a 15% reduction in needle insertions (RR: 0.85, p=0.052), and a 26% decrease in needle passes (RR: 0.74, p=0.070). In obese patients of BMI ≥ 30 kg/m(2), use of ultrasound resulted in 26% greater first-insertion success rates (RR: 1.26, p=0.187), a 21% decrease in needle insertions (RR: 0.79, p=0.025), a 38% decrease in needle passes (RR: 0.62, p=0.030), and a 75% decrease in patients reporting neutral or low patient satisfaction with anesthesia administration (RR: 0.25, p=0.004). DISCUSSION: Resident anesthesiologists competently utilized the ultrasound system after receiving minimal training. Technical endpoints and patient satisfaction trended towards improvement when ultrasound was used prior to spinal placement, with stronger trends observed in obese patients. Additional study is required to fully characterize the impact of the ultrasound system on clinical efficacy. 2019-02-25 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6555430/ /pubmed/31179158 http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2155-6148.1000878 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Singla, Priyanka
Dixon, Adam J
Sheeran, Jessica L
Scalzo, David
Mauldin, Frank W
Tiouririne, Mohamed
Feasibility of Spinal Anesthesia Placement Using Automated Interpretation of Lumbar Ultrasound Images: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
title Feasibility of Spinal Anesthesia Placement Using Automated Interpretation of Lumbar Ultrasound Images: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Feasibility of Spinal Anesthesia Placement Using Automated Interpretation of Lumbar Ultrasound Images: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Feasibility of Spinal Anesthesia Placement Using Automated Interpretation of Lumbar Ultrasound Images: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility of Spinal Anesthesia Placement Using Automated Interpretation of Lumbar Ultrasound Images: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Feasibility of Spinal Anesthesia Placement Using Automated Interpretation of Lumbar Ultrasound Images: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort feasibility of spinal anesthesia placement using automated interpretation of lumbar ultrasound images: a prospective randomized controlled trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6555430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31179158
http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2155-6148.1000878
work_keys_str_mv AT singlapriyanka feasibilityofspinalanesthesiaplacementusingautomatedinterpretationoflumbarultrasoundimagesaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT dixonadamj feasibilityofspinalanesthesiaplacementusingautomatedinterpretationoflumbarultrasoundimagesaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sheeranjessical feasibilityofspinalanesthesiaplacementusingautomatedinterpretationoflumbarultrasoundimagesaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT scalzodavid feasibilityofspinalanesthesiaplacementusingautomatedinterpretationoflumbarultrasoundimagesaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mauldinfrankw feasibilityofspinalanesthesiaplacementusingautomatedinterpretationoflumbarultrasoundimagesaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT tiouririnemohamed feasibilityofspinalanesthesiaplacementusingautomatedinterpretationoflumbarultrasoundimagesaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial