Cargando…
Feasibility of Spinal Anesthesia Placement Using Automated Interpretation of Lumbar Ultrasound Images: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the efficacy of spinal anesthesia administration by resident physicians when using an ultrasound system with automated neuraxial landmark detection capabilities. METHODS: 150 patients were enrolled in this trial. Anesthesiology residents placed spinals in subjects un...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6555430/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31179158 http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2155-6148.1000878 |
_version_ | 1783425151142985728 |
---|---|
author | Singla, Priyanka Dixon, Adam J Sheeran, Jessica L Scalzo, David Mauldin, Frank W Tiouririne, Mohamed |
author_facet | Singla, Priyanka Dixon, Adam J Sheeran, Jessica L Scalzo, David Mauldin, Frank W Tiouririne, Mohamed |
author_sort | Singla, Priyanka |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the efficacy of spinal anesthesia administration by resident physicians when using an ultrasound system with automated neuraxial landmark detection capabilities. METHODS: 150 patients were enrolled in this trial. Anesthesiology residents placed spinals in subjects undergoing scheduled cesarean delivery using one of three techniques to identify neuraxial landmarks: palpation, ultrasound, or combined palpation and ultrasound. Ultrasound was performed using a handheld system that automatically identified neuraxial landmarks (e.g. midline, intervertebral spaces). All residents watched a 10-minute video and received 20 minutes of hands-on training prior to participating in the study. First insertion success rate was the primary end point. RESULTS: Among all patients, use of ultrasound resulted in a 11% greater first-insertion success rate (RR: 1.11 [0.85–1.47], p=0.431), a 15% reduction in needle insertions (RR: 0.85, p=0.052), and a 26% decrease in needle passes (RR: 0.74, p=0.070). In obese patients of BMI ≥ 30 kg/m(2), use of ultrasound resulted in 26% greater first-insertion success rates (RR: 1.26, p=0.187), a 21% decrease in needle insertions (RR: 0.79, p=0.025), a 38% decrease in needle passes (RR: 0.62, p=0.030), and a 75% decrease in patients reporting neutral or low patient satisfaction with anesthesia administration (RR: 0.25, p=0.004). DISCUSSION: Resident anesthesiologists competently utilized the ultrasound system after receiving minimal training. Technical endpoints and patient satisfaction trended towards improvement when ultrasound was used prior to spinal placement, with stronger trends observed in obese patients. Additional study is required to fully characterize the impact of the ultrasound system on clinical efficacy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6555430 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65554302019-06-07 Feasibility of Spinal Anesthesia Placement Using Automated Interpretation of Lumbar Ultrasound Images: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Singla, Priyanka Dixon, Adam J Sheeran, Jessica L Scalzo, David Mauldin, Frank W Tiouririne, Mohamed J Anesth Clin Res Article BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the efficacy of spinal anesthesia administration by resident physicians when using an ultrasound system with automated neuraxial landmark detection capabilities. METHODS: 150 patients were enrolled in this trial. Anesthesiology residents placed spinals in subjects undergoing scheduled cesarean delivery using one of three techniques to identify neuraxial landmarks: palpation, ultrasound, or combined palpation and ultrasound. Ultrasound was performed using a handheld system that automatically identified neuraxial landmarks (e.g. midline, intervertebral spaces). All residents watched a 10-minute video and received 20 minutes of hands-on training prior to participating in the study. First insertion success rate was the primary end point. RESULTS: Among all patients, use of ultrasound resulted in a 11% greater first-insertion success rate (RR: 1.11 [0.85–1.47], p=0.431), a 15% reduction in needle insertions (RR: 0.85, p=0.052), and a 26% decrease in needle passes (RR: 0.74, p=0.070). In obese patients of BMI ≥ 30 kg/m(2), use of ultrasound resulted in 26% greater first-insertion success rates (RR: 1.26, p=0.187), a 21% decrease in needle insertions (RR: 0.79, p=0.025), a 38% decrease in needle passes (RR: 0.62, p=0.030), and a 75% decrease in patients reporting neutral or low patient satisfaction with anesthesia administration (RR: 0.25, p=0.004). DISCUSSION: Resident anesthesiologists competently utilized the ultrasound system after receiving minimal training. Technical endpoints and patient satisfaction trended towards improvement when ultrasound was used prior to spinal placement, with stronger trends observed in obese patients. Additional study is required to fully characterize the impact of the ultrasound system on clinical efficacy. 2019-02-25 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6555430/ /pubmed/31179158 http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2155-6148.1000878 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Article Singla, Priyanka Dixon, Adam J Sheeran, Jessica L Scalzo, David Mauldin, Frank W Tiouririne, Mohamed Feasibility of Spinal Anesthesia Placement Using Automated Interpretation of Lumbar Ultrasound Images: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial |
title | Feasibility of Spinal Anesthesia Placement Using Automated Interpretation of Lumbar Ultrasound Images: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full | Feasibility of Spinal Anesthesia Placement Using Automated Interpretation of Lumbar Ultrasound Images: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_fullStr | Feasibility of Spinal Anesthesia Placement Using Automated Interpretation of Lumbar Ultrasound Images: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Feasibility of Spinal Anesthesia Placement Using Automated Interpretation of Lumbar Ultrasound Images: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_short | Feasibility of Spinal Anesthesia Placement Using Automated Interpretation of Lumbar Ultrasound Images: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_sort | feasibility of spinal anesthesia placement using automated interpretation of lumbar ultrasound images: a prospective randomized controlled trial |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6555430/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31179158 http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2155-6148.1000878 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT singlapriyanka feasibilityofspinalanesthesiaplacementusingautomatedinterpretationoflumbarultrasoundimagesaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT dixonadamj feasibilityofspinalanesthesiaplacementusingautomatedinterpretationoflumbarultrasoundimagesaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT sheeranjessical feasibilityofspinalanesthesiaplacementusingautomatedinterpretationoflumbarultrasoundimagesaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT scalzodavid feasibilityofspinalanesthesiaplacementusingautomatedinterpretationoflumbarultrasoundimagesaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mauldinfrankw feasibilityofspinalanesthesiaplacementusingautomatedinterpretationoflumbarultrasoundimagesaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT tiouririnemohamed feasibilityofspinalanesthesiaplacementusingautomatedinterpretationoflumbarultrasoundimagesaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial |