Cargando…

Comparison between physical and cognitive treatment in patients with MIC and Alzheimer’s disease

Cognitive and physical activity treatments (CT and PT) are two non-pharmacological approaches frequently used in patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). The aim of this study was to compare CT and PT in these diseases. Eighty-seven patients were randomly assigned...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fonte, Cristina, Smania, Nicola, Pedrinolla, Anna, Munari, Daniele, Gandolfi, Marialuisa, Picelli, Alessandro, Varalta, Valentina, Benetti, Maria V., Brugnera, Annalisa, Federico, Angela, Muti, Ettore, Tamburin, Stefano, Schena, Federico, Venturelli, Massimo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6555450/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31127076
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/aging.101970
_version_ 1783425155743088640
author Fonte, Cristina
Smania, Nicola
Pedrinolla, Anna
Munari, Daniele
Gandolfi, Marialuisa
Picelli, Alessandro
Varalta, Valentina
Benetti, Maria V.
Brugnera, Annalisa
Federico, Angela
Muti, Ettore
Tamburin, Stefano
Schena, Federico
Venturelli, Massimo
author_facet Fonte, Cristina
Smania, Nicola
Pedrinolla, Anna
Munari, Daniele
Gandolfi, Marialuisa
Picelli, Alessandro
Varalta, Valentina
Benetti, Maria V.
Brugnera, Annalisa
Federico, Angela
Muti, Ettore
Tamburin, Stefano
Schena, Federico
Venturelli, Massimo
author_sort Fonte, Cristina
collection PubMed
description Cognitive and physical activity treatments (CT and PT) are two non-pharmacological approaches frequently used in patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). The aim of this study was to compare CT and PT in these diseases. Eighty-seven patients were randomly assigned to CT (n=30), PT (n=27) or control group (CTRL; n=30) for 6 months. The global cognitive function was measured by Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE). Specific neuropsychological tests explored attention, memory, executive functions, behavioral disorders. Cardiovascular risk factors (CVD) were collected. All measures were performed before (T0), after treatments (T1), and at three-months follow-up (T2). MMSE did not change from T0 to T1 and T2 in patients assigned to PT and CT, while CTRL patients showed a decline MCI: -11.8%, AD: -16.2%). Between group differences (MCI vs AD) were not found at T1 and T2. Significant worsening was found for CTRL in MCI (T0- T1: P=.039; T0-T2: P<.001) and AD (T0-T1: P<.001; T0-T2: P<.001), and amelioration was found for CT in AD (T0-T2: P<.001). Attention, executive functions and behavioral disorders were unaffected by either PT or CT. Memory was increased in patients with MCI assigned to PT (+6.9%) and CT (+8.5%).. CVD were ameliorated in the PT group. CTRL patients of both groups, revealed significant decline in all functions and no between groups differences were detected. PT appear to ameliorate CVD. Although between groups differences were not found, results suggest a major retention in MCI compared with AD, suggesting that the latter might benefit better of constant rather than periodic treatments. This study confirms the positive effects of CT and PT in mitigating the cognitive decline in MCI and AD patients, and it is the first to demonstrate their similar effectiveness on maintaining cognitive function.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6555450
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Impact Journals
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65554502019-06-17 Comparison between physical and cognitive treatment in patients with MIC and Alzheimer’s disease Fonte, Cristina Smania, Nicola Pedrinolla, Anna Munari, Daniele Gandolfi, Marialuisa Picelli, Alessandro Varalta, Valentina Benetti, Maria V. Brugnera, Annalisa Federico, Angela Muti, Ettore Tamburin, Stefano Schena, Federico Venturelli, Massimo Aging (Albany NY) Research Paper Cognitive and physical activity treatments (CT and PT) are two non-pharmacological approaches frequently used in patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). The aim of this study was to compare CT and PT in these diseases. Eighty-seven patients were randomly assigned to CT (n=30), PT (n=27) or control group (CTRL; n=30) for 6 months. The global cognitive function was measured by Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE). Specific neuropsychological tests explored attention, memory, executive functions, behavioral disorders. Cardiovascular risk factors (CVD) were collected. All measures were performed before (T0), after treatments (T1), and at three-months follow-up (T2). MMSE did not change from T0 to T1 and T2 in patients assigned to PT and CT, while CTRL patients showed a decline MCI: -11.8%, AD: -16.2%). Between group differences (MCI vs AD) were not found at T1 and T2. Significant worsening was found for CTRL in MCI (T0- T1: P=.039; T0-T2: P<.001) and AD (T0-T1: P<.001; T0-T2: P<.001), and amelioration was found for CT in AD (T0-T2: P<.001). Attention, executive functions and behavioral disorders were unaffected by either PT or CT. Memory was increased in patients with MCI assigned to PT (+6.9%) and CT (+8.5%).. CVD were ameliorated in the PT group. CTRL patients of both groups, revealed significant decline in all functions and no between groups differences were detected. PT appear to ameliorate CVD. Although between groups differences were not found, results suggest a major retention in MCI compared with AD, suggesting that the latter might benefit better of constant rather than periodic treatments. This study confirms the positive effects of CT and PT in mitigating the cognitive decline in MCI and AD patients, and it is the first to demonstrate their similar effectiveness on maintaining cognitive function. Impact Journals 2019-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6555450/ /pubmed/31127076 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/aging.101970 Text en Copyright © 2019 Fonte et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 3.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Fonte, Cristina
Smania, Nicola
Pedrinolla, Anna
Munari, Daniele
Gandolfi, Marialuisa
Picelli, Alessandro
Varalta, Valentina
Benetti, Maria V.
Brugnera, Annalisa
Federico, Angela
Muti, Ettore
Tamburin, Stefano
Schena, Federico
Venturelli, Massimo
Comparison between physical and cognitive treatment in patients with MIC and Alzheimer’s disease
title Comparison between physical and cognitive treatment in patients with MIC and Alzheimer’s disease
title_full Comparison between physical and cognitive treatment in patients with MIC and Alzheimer’s disease
title_fullStr Comparison between physical and cognitive treatment in patients with MIC and Alzheimer’s disease
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between physical and cognitive treatment in patients with MIC and Alzheimer’s disease
title_short Comparison between physical and cognitive treatment in patients with MIC and Alzheimer’s disease
title_sort comparison between physical and cognitive treatment in patients with mic and alzheimer’s disease
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6555450/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31127076
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/aging.101970
work_keys_str_mv AT fontecristina comparisonbetweenphysicalandcognitivetreatmentinpatientswithmicandalzheimersdisease
AT smanianicola comparisonbetweenphysicalandcognitivetreatmentinpatientswithmicandalzheimersdisease
AT pedrinollaanna comparisonbetweenphysicalandcognitivetreatmentinpatientswithmicandalzheimersdisease
AT munaridaniele comparisonbetweenphysicalandcognitivetreatmentinpatientswithmicandalzheimersdisease
AT gandolfimarialuisa comparisonbetweenphysicalandcognitivetreatmentinpatientswithmicandalzheimersdisease
AT picellialessandro comparisonbetweenphysicalandcognitivetreatmentinpatientswithmicandalzheimersdisease
AT varaltavalentina comparisonbetweenphysicalandcognitivetreatmentinpatientswithmicandalzheimersdisease
AT benettimariav comparisonbetweenphysicalandcognitivetreatmentinpatientswithmicandalzheimersdisease
AT brugneraannalisa comparisonbetweenphysicalandcognitivetreatmentinpatientswithmicandalzheimersdisease
AT federicoangela comparisonbetweenphysicalandcognitivetreatmentinpatientswithmicandalzheimersdisease
AT mutiettore comparisonbetweenphysicalandcognitivetreatmentinpatientswithmicandalzheimersdisease
AT tamburinstefano comparisonbetweenphysicalandcognitivetreatmentinpatientswithmicandalzheimersdisease
AT schenafederico comparisonbetweenphysicalandcognitivetreatmentinpatientswithmicandalzheimersdisease
AT venturellimassimo comparisonbetweenphysicalandcognitivetreatmentinpatientswithmicandalzheimersdisease