Cargando…
Intravenous immunoglobulin and rituximab versus placebo treatment of antibody-associated psychosis: study protocol of a randomised phase IIa double-blinded placebo-controlled trial (SINAPPS2)
BACKGROUND: Evidence is conflicting about a causal role of inflammation in psychosis and, specifically, regarding antibodies binding to neuronal membrane targets, especially N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors. NMDAR, LGI1 and GABA-A antibodies were found more prevalent in people with psychosis than in h...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6555751/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31174586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3336-1 |
_version_ | 1783425203344244736 |
---|---|
author | Lennox, Belinda Yeeles, Ksenija Jones, Peter B. Zandi, Michael Joyce, Eileen Yu, Ly-Mee Tomei, Giuliano Pollard, Rebecca Vincent, Sally-Anne Shimazaki, Mio Cairns, Iona Dowling, Francis Kabir, Thomas Barnes, Thomas R. E. Lingford Hughes, Anne Hosseini, Akram A. Harrower, Timothy Buckley, Camilla Coles, Alasdair |
author_facet | Lennox, Belinda Yeeles, Ksenija Jones, Peter B. Zandi, Michael Joyce, Eileen Yu, Ly-Mee Tomei, Giuliano Pollard, Rebecca Vincent, Sally-Anne Shimazaki, Mio Cairns, Iona Dowling, Francis Kabir, Thomas Barnes, Thomas R. E. Lingford Hughes, Anne Hosseini, Akram A. Harrower, Timothy Buckley, Camilla Coles, Alasdair |
author_sort | Lennox, Belinda |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Evidence is conflicting about a causal role of inflammation in psychosis and, specifically, regarding antibodies binding to neuronal membrane targets, especially N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors. NMDAR, LGI1 and GABA-A antibodies were found more prevalent in people with psychosis than in healthy controls. We aim to test whether these antibodies are pathogenic and may cause isolated psychosis. The SINAPPS2 phase IIa double-blinded randomised controlled trial will test the efficacy and safety of immunoglobulin and rituximab treatment versus placebo for patients with acute psychosis symptoms as added to psychiatric standard of care. METHODS: We will screen approximately 2500 adult patients with acute psychosis to identify 160 with antibody-positive psychosis without co-existing neurological disease and recruit about 80 eligible participants to the trial in the period from September 2017 to September 2021 across the UK. Eligible patients will be randomised 1:1 either to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) followed by rituximab or to placebo infusions of 1% albumin followed by 0.9% sodium chloride, respectively. To detect a time-to-symptomatic-recovery hazard ratio of 0.322 with a power of 80%, 56 participants are needed to complete the trial, allowing for up to 12 participants to drop out of each group. Eligible patients will be randomised and assessed at baseline within 4 weeks of their eligibility confirmation. The treatment will start with IVIG or 1% albumin placebo infusions over 2–4 consecutive days no later than 7 days from baseline. It will continue 4–5 weeks later with a rituximab or sodium chloride placebo infusion and will end 2–3 weeks after this with another rituximab or placebo infusion. The primary outcome is the time to symptomatic recovery defined as symptomatic remission sustained for at least 6 months on the following Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale items: P1, P2, P3, N1, N4, N6, G5 and G9. Participants will be followed for 12 months from the first day of treatment or, where sustained remission begins after the first 6 months, for an additional minimum of 6 months to assess later response. DISCUSSION: The SINAPPS2 trial aims to test whether immunotherapy is efficacious and safe in psychosis associated with anti-neuronal membrane antibodies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN, 11177045. Registered on 2 May 2017. EudraCT, 2016-000118-31. Registered on 22 November 2016. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03194815. Registered on 21 June 2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3336-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6555751 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65557512019-06-10 Intravenous immunoglobulin and rituximab versus placebo treatment of antibody-associated psychosis: study protocol of a randomised phase IIa double-blinded placebo-controlled trial (SINAPPS2) Lennox, Belinda Yeeles, Ksenija Jones, Peter B. Zandi, Michael Joyce, Eileen Yu, Ly-Mee Tomei, Giuliano Pollard, Rebecca Vincent, Sally-Anne Shimazaki, Mio Cairns, Iona Dowling, Francis Kabir, Thomas Barnes, Thomas R. E. Lingford Hughes, Anne Hosseini, Akram A. Harrower, Timothy Buckley, Camilla Coles, Alasdair Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Evidence is conflicting about a causal role of inflammation in psychosis and, specifically, regarding antibodies binding to neuronal membrane targets, especially N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors. NMDAR, LGI1 and GABA-A antibodies were found more prevalent in people with psychosis than in healthy controls. We aim to test whether these antibodies are pathogenic and may cause isolated psychosis. The SINAPPS2 phase IIa double-blinded randomised controlled trial will test the efficacy and safety of immunoglobulin and rituximab treatment versus placebo for patients with acute psychosis symptoms as added to psychiatric standard of care. METHODS: We will screen approximately 2500 adult patients with acute psychosis to identify 160 with antibody-positive psychosis without co-existing neurological disease and recruit about 80 eligible participants to the trial in the period from September 2017 to September 2021 across the UK. Eligible patients will be randomised 1:1 either to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) followed by rituximab or to placebo infusions of 1% albumin followed by 0.9% sodium chloride, respectively. To detect a time-to-symptomatic-recovery hazard ratio of 0.322 with a power of 80%, 56 participants are needed to complete the trial, allowing for up to 12 participants to drop out of each group. Eligible patients will be randomised and assessed at baseline within 4 weeks of their eligibility confirmation. The treatment will start with IVIG or 1% albumin placebo infusions over 2–4 consecutive days no later than 7 days from baseline. It will continue 4–5 weeks later with a rituximab or sodium chloride placebo infusion and will end 2–3 weeks after this with another rituximab or placebo infusion. The primary outcome is the time to symptomatic recovery defined as symptomatic remission sustained for at least 6 months on the following Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale items: P1, P2, P3, N1, N4, N6, G5 and G9. Participants will be followed for 12 months from the first day of treatment or, where sustained remission begins after the first 6 months, for an additional minimum of 6 months to assess later response. DISCUSSION: The SINAPPS2 trial aims to test whether immunotherapy is efficacious and safe in psychosis associated with anti-neuronal membrane antibodies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN, 11177045. Registered on 2 May 2017. EudraCT, 2016-000118-31. Registered on 22 November 2016. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03194815. Registered on 21 June 2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3336-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6555751/ /pubmed/31174586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3336-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Lennox, Belinda Yeeles, Ksenija Jones, Peter B. Zandi, Michael Joyce, Eileen Yu, Ly-Mee Tomei, Giuliano Pollard, Rebecca Vincent, Sally-Anne Shimazaki, Mio Cairns, Iona Dowling, Francis Kabir, Thomas Barnes, Thomas R. E. Lingford Hughes, Anne Hosseini, Akram A. Harrower, Timothy Buckley, Camilla Coles, Alasdair Intravenous immunoglobulin and rituximab versus placebo treatment of antibody-associated psychosis: study protocol of a randomised phase IIa double-blinded placebo-controlled trial (SINAPPS2) |
title | Intravenous immunoglobulin and rituximab versus placebo treatment of antibody-associated psychosis: study protocol of a randomised phase IIa double-blinded placebo-controlled trial (SINAPPS2) |
title_full | Intravenous immunoglobulin and rituximab versus placebo treatment of antibody-associated psychosis: study protocol of a randomised phase IIa double-blinded placebo-controlled trial (SINAPPS2) |
title_fullStr | Intravenous immunoglobulin and rituximab versus placebo treatment of antibody-associated psychosis: study protocol of a randomised phase IIa double-blinded placebo-controlled trial (SINAPPS2) |
title_full_unstemmed | Intravenous immunoglobulin and rituximab versus placebo treatment of antibody-associated psychosis: study protocol of a randomised phase IIa double-blinded placebo-controlled trial (SINAPPS2) |
title_short | Intravenous immunoglobulin and rituximab versus placebo treatment of antibody-associated psychosis: study protocol of a randomised phase IIa double-blinded placebo-controlled trial (SINAPPS2) |
title_sort | intravenous immunoglobulin and rituximab versus placebo treatment of antibody-associated psychosis: study protocol of a randomised phase iia double-blinded placebo-controlled trial (sinapps2) |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6555751/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31174586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3336-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lennoxbelinda intravenousimmunoglobulinandrituximabversusplacebotreatmentofantibodyassociatedpsychosisstudyprotocolofarandomisedphaseiiadoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrialsinapps2 AT yeelesksenija intravenousimmunoglobulinandrituximabversusplacebotreatmentofantibodyassociatedpsychosisstudyprotocolofarandomisedphaseiiadoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrialsinapps2 AT jonespeterb intravenousimmunoglobulinandrituximabversusplacebotreatmentofantibodyassociatedpsychosisstudyprotocolofarandomisedphaseiiadoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrialsinapps2 AT zandimichael intravenousimmunoglobulinandrituximabversusplacebotreatmentofantibodyassociatedpsychosisstudyprotocolofarandomisedphaseiiadoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrialsinapps2 AT joyceeileen intravenousimmunoglobulinandrituximabversusplacebotreatmentofantibodyassociatedpsychosisstudyprotocolofarandomisedphaseiiadoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrialsinapps2 AT yulymee intravenousimmunoglobulinandrituximabversusplacebotreatmentofantibodyassociatedpsychosisstudyprotocolofarandomisedphaseiiadoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrialsinapps2 AT tomeigiuliano intravenousimmunoglobulinandrituximabversusplacebotreatmentofantibodyassociatedpsychosisstudyprotocolofarandomisedphaseiiadoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrialsinapps2 AT pollardrebecca intravenousimmunoglobulinandrituximabversusplacebotreatmentofantibodyassociatedpsychosisstudyprotocolofarandomisedphaseiiadoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrialsinapps2 AT vincentsallyanne intravenousimmunoglobulinandrituximabversusplacebotreatmentofantibodyassociatedpsychosisstudyprotocolofarandomisedphaseiiadoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrialsinapps2 AT shimazakimio intravenousimmunoglobulinandrituximabversusplacebotreatmentofantibodyassociatedpsychosisstudyprotocolofarandomisedphaseiiadoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrialsinapps2 AT cairnsiona intravenousimmunoglobulinandrituximabversusplacebotreatmentofantibodyassociatedpsychosisstudyprotocolofarandomisedphaseiiadoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrialsinapps2 AT dowlingfrancis intravenousimmunoglobulinandrituximabversusplacebotreatmentofantibodyassociatedpsychosisstudyprotocolofarandomisedphaseiiadoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrialsinapps2 AT kabirthomas intravenousimmunoglobulinandrituximabversusplacebotreatmentofantibodyassociatedpsychosisstudyprotocolofarandomisedphaseiiadoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrialsinapps2 AT barnesthomasre intravenousimmunoglobulinandrituximabversusplacebotreatmentofantibodyassociatedpsychosisstudyprotocolofarandomisedphaseiiadoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrialsinapps2 AT lingfordhughesanne intravenousimmunoglobulinandrituximabversusplacebotreatmentofantibodyassociatedpsychosisstudyprotocolofarandomisedphaseiiadoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrialsinapps2 AT hosseiniakrama intravenousimmunoglobulinandrituximabversusplacebotreatmentofantibodyassociatedpsychosisstudyprotocolofarandomisedphaseiiadoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrialsinapps2 AT harrowertimothy intravenousimmunoglobulinandrituximabversusplacebotreatmentofantibodyassociatedpsychosisstudyprotocolofarandomisedphaseiiadoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrialsinapps2 AT buckleycamilla intravenousimmunoglobulinandrituximabversusplacebotreatmentofantibodyassociatedpsychosisstudyprotocolofarandomisedphaseiiadoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrialsinapps2 AT colesalasdair intravenousimmunoglobulinandrituximabversusplacebotreatmentofantibodyassociatedpsychosisstudyprotocolofarandomisedphaseiiadoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrialsinapps2 |