Cargando…
Comparison of standard versus 90° rotation technique for LMA Flexible™ insertion: a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Insertion of a flexible laryngeal mask airway (LMA Flexible) is known to be more difficult than that of a conventional laryngeal mask airway. The 90° rotation technique can improve the success rate with a conventional laryngeal mask airway but its effect with the LMA Flexible remains unk...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6555754/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31170926 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-019-0773-z |
_version_ | 1783425204063567872 |
---|---|
author | Koo, Bon-Wook Oh, Ah-Young Hwang, Jung-Won Na, Hyo-Seok Min, Seong-Won |
author_facet | Koo, Bon-Wook Oh, Ah-Young Hwang, Jung-Won Na, Hyo-Seok Min, Seong-Won |
author_sort | Koo, Bon-Wook |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Insertion of a flexible laryngeal mask airway (LMA Flexible) is known to be more difficult than that of a conventional laryngeal mask airway. The 90° rotation technique can improve the success rate with a conventional laryngeal mask airway but its effect with the LMA Flexible remains unknown. We assessed whether the 90° rotation technique increased the first-attempt success rate of LMA Flexible insertion versus the standard technique. METHODS: In total, 129 female patients undergoing breast surgery were analyzed. The primary endpoint was success at the first attempt. The insertion time, number of trials, number of manipulations required, and oropharyngeal leak pressure were also evaluated. Heart rate and mean blood pressure were recorded 1 min before and 1 min after insertion. Blood staining on the LMA Flexible after removal and postoperative sore throat were checked. RESULTS: The first-attempt success rates were comparable between the groups (93% vs. 98.3%, P = .20). The insertion time, number of trials and manipulations, hemodynamic variables, and complications, such as blood staining and sore throat, did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The 90° rotation technique is a good alternative to the standard technique for insertion of the LMA Flexible. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03028896). It was registered retrospectively at Jan 19th, 2017. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6555754 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65557542019-06-10 Comparison of standard versus 90° rotation technique for LMA Flexible™ insertion: a randomized controlled trial Koo, Bon-Wook Oh, Ah-Young Hwang, Jung-Won Na, Hyo-Seok Min, Seong-Won BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Insertion of a flexible laryngeal mask airway (LMA Flexible) is known to be more difficult than that of a conventional laryngeal mask airway. The 90° rotation technique can improve the success rate with a conventional laryngeal mask airway but its effect with the LMA Flexible remains unknown. We assessed whether the 90° rotation technique increased the first-attempt success rate of LMA Flexible insertion versus the standard technique. METHODS: In total, 129 female patients undergoing breast surgery were analyzed. The primary endpoint was success at the first attempt. The insertion time, number of trials, number of manipulations required, and oropharyngeal leak pressure were also evaluated. Heart rate and mean blood pressure were recorded 1 min before and 1 min after insertion. Blood staining on the LMA Flexible after removal and postoperative sore throat were checked. RESULTS: The first-attempt success rates were comparable between the groups (93% vs. 98.3%, P = .20). The insertion time, number of trials and manipulations, hemodynamic variables, and complications, such as blood staining and sore throat, did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The 90° rotation technique is a good alternative to the standard technique for insertion of the LMA Flexible. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03028896). It was registered retrospectively at Jan 19th, 2017. BioMed Central 2019-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6555754/ /pubmed/31170926 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-019-0773-z Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Koo, Bon-Wook Oh, Ah-Young Hwang, Jung-Won Na, Hyo-Seok Min, Seong-Won Comparison of standard versus 90° rotation technique for LMA Flexible™ insertion: a randomized controlled trial |
title | Comparison of standard versus 90° rotation technique for LMA Flexible™ insertion: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Comparison of standard versus 90° rotation technique for LMA Flexible™ insertion: a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Comparison of standard versus 90° rotation technique for LMA Flexible™ insertion: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of standard versus 90° rotation technique for LMA Flexible™ insertion: a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Comparison of standard versus 90° rotation technique for LMA Flexible™ insertion: a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | comparison of standard versus 90° rotation technique for lma flexible™ insertion: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6555754/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31170926 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-019-0773-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT koobonwook comparisonofstandardversus90rotationtechniqueforlmaflexibleinsertionarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT ohahyoung comparisonofstandardversus90rotationtechniqueforlmaflexibleinsertionarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hwangjungwon comparisonofstandardversus90rotationtechniqueforlmaflexibleinsertionarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT nahyoseok comparisonofstandardversus90rotationtechniqueforlmaflexibleinsertionarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT minseongwon comparisonofstandardversus90rotationtechniqueforlmaflexibleinsertionarandomizedcontrolledtrial |