Cargando…

Iron intake, body iron status, and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Iron has been shown to promote breast carcinogenesis in animal models through generation of oxidative stress and interaction with estrogen. Heme iron, which is found exclusively in animal-sourced foods, is suggested to have a more detrimental effect. Epidemiological evidence of the assoc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chang, Vicky C., Cotterchio, Michelle, Khoo, Edwin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6555759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31170936
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5642-0
_version_ 1783425205253701632
author Chang, Vicky C.
Cotterchio, Michelle
Khoo, Edwin
author_facet Chang, Vicky C.
Cotterchio, Michelle
Khoo, Edwin
author_sort Chang, Vicky C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Iron has been shown to promote breast carcinogenesis in animal models through generation of oxidative stress and interaction with estrogen. Heme iron, which is found exclusively in animal-sourced foods, is suggested to have a more detrimental effect. Epidemiological evidence of the association between iron and breast cancer risk remains inconclusive and has not been comprehensively summarized. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated associations between both iron intake and body iron status and breast cancer risk. METHODS: Four electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Scopus) were searched up to December 2018 for studies assessing iron intake and/or biomarkers of iron status in relation to breast cancer risk. Using random-effects meta-analyses, pooled relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated comparing the highest vs. lowest category of each iron measure. Dose-response meta-analyses were also performed to investigate linear and nonlinear associations. RESULTS: A total of 27 studies were included in the review, of which 23 were eligible for meta-analysis of one or more iron intake/status measures. Comparing the highest vs. lowest category, heme iron intake was significantly associated with increased breast cancer risk, with a pooled RR of 1.12 (95% CI: 1.04–1.22), whereas no associations were found for dietary (1.01, 95% CI: 0.89–1.15), supplemental (1.02, 95% CI: 0.91–1.13), or total (0.97, 95% CI: 0.82–1.14) iron intake. Associations of iron status indicators with breast cancer risk were generally in the positive direction; however, a significant pooled RR was found only for serum/plasma levels (highest vs. lowest) of iron (1.22, 95% CI: 1.01–1.47), but not for ferritin (1.13, 95% CI: 0.78–1.62), transferrin saturation (1.16, 95% CI: 0.91–1.47), or total iron-binding capacity (1.10, 95% CI: 0.97–1.25). In addition, a nonlinear dose-response was observed for heme iron intake and serum iron (both P(nonlinearity) < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Heme iron intake and serum iron levels may be positively associated with breast cancer risk. Although associations were modest, these findings may have public health implications given the widespread consumption of (heme) iron-rich foods. In light of methodological and research gaps identified, further research is warranted to better elucidate the relationship between iron and breast cancer risk. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-019-5642-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6555759
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65557592019-06-10 Iron intake, body iron status, and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis Chang, Vicky C. Cotterchio, Michelle Khoo, Edwin BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Iron has been shown to promote breast carcinogenesis in animal models through generation of oxidative stress and interaction with estrogen. Heme iron, which is found exclusively in animal-sourced foods, is suggested to have a more detrimental effect. Epidemiological evidence of the association between iron and breast cancer risk remains inconclusive and has not been comprehensively summarized. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated associations between both iron intake and body iron status and breast cancer risk. METHODS: Four electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Scopus) were searched up to December 2018 for studies assessing iron intake and/or biomarkers of iron status in relation to breast cancer risk. Using random-effects meta-analyses, pooled relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated comparing the highest vs. lowest category of each iron measure. Dose-response meta-analyses were also performed to investigate linear and nonlinear associations. RESULTS: A total of 27 studies were included in the review, of which 23 were eligible for meta-analysis of one or more iron intake/status measures. Comparing the highest vs. lowest category, heme iron intake was significantly associated with increased breast cancer risk, with a pooled RR of 1.12 (95% CI: 1.04–1.22), whereas no associations were found for dietary (1.01, 95% CI: 0.89–1.15), supplemental (1.02, 95% CI: 0.91–1.13), or total (0.97, 95% CI: 0.82–1.14) iron intake. Associations of iron status indicators with breast cancer risk were generally in the positive direction; however, a significant pooled RR was found only for serum/plasma levels (highest vs. lowest) of iron (1.22, 95% CI: 1.01–1.47), but not for ferritin (1.13, 95% CI: 0.78–1.62), transferrin saturation (1.16, 95% CI: 0.91–1.47), or total iron-binding capacity (1.10, 95% CI: 0.97–1.25). In addition, a nonlinear dose-response was observed for heme iron intake and serum iron (both P(nonlinearity) < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Heme iron intake and serum iron levels may be positively associated with breast cancer risk. Although associations were modest, these findings may have public health implications given the widespread consumption of (heme) iron-rich foods. In light of methodological and research gaps identified, further research is warranted to better elucidate the relationship between iron and breast cancer risk. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-019-5642-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6555759/ /pubmed/31170936 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5642-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chang, Vicky C.
Cotterchio, Michelle
Khoo, Edwin
Iron intake, body iron status, and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Iron intake, body iron status, and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Iron intake, body iron status, and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Iron intake, body iron status, and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Iron intake, body iron status, and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Iron intake, body iron status, and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort iron intake, body iron status, and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6555759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31170936
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5642-0
work_keys_str_mv AT changvickyc ironintakebodyironstatusandriskofbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT cotterchiomichelle ironintakebodyironstatusandriskofbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT khooedwin ironintakebodyironstatusandriskofbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis