Cargando…
Evaluation of optic canal anatomy and symmetry using CT
OBJECTIVE: We aim to describe the anatomy and symmetry patterns of the optic canal in patients having undergone maxillofacial CT imaging. METHODS: In this retrospective chart review, we included all patients who received sinus and maxillofacial CT at the University of North Carolina hospitals betwee...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6557077/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31245611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2019-000302 |
_version_ | 1783425419035279360 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Xinxin Lee, Yueh Olson, Daniel Fleischman, David |
author_facet | Zhang, Xinxin Lee, Yueh Olson, Daniel Fleischman, David |
author_sort | Zhang, Xinxin |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: We aim to describe the anatomy and symmetry patterns of the optic canal in patients having undergone maxillofacial CT imaging. METHODS: In this retrospective chart review, we included all patients who received sinus and maxillofacial CT at the University of North Carolina hospitals between 2008 and 2016, without facial or cranial fractures or other medical conditions that would affect optic canal size. We measured the length of ≥75% enclosed canal, minimum cross-sectional area and minimum diameter bilaterally using iNtuition TeraRecon (Durham, North Carolina) and compared bilateral symmetry using a 20 % difference threshold. Each parameter above was compared among white, black, non-white and non-black patients. RESULTS: Of 335 patients, the mean canal length was 5.61±2.22 mm. The mean minimum area was 11.84±3.11 mm(2). The mean minimum diameter was 3.28±0.55 mm. A total of 39.4% (132/335) of patients had asymmetric canal lengths, 18.8% (63/335) had asymmetric minimum areas, and 12.5% (42/335) had asymmetric minimum diameters. No differences were found between racial groups. The right optic canal was larger than the left (right: 12.12 mm vs left: 11.55 mm, p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Optic canal asymmetry is not uncommon. It may affect risk of papilloedema severity, explain cases of unilateral or asymmetric papilloedema and possibly asymmetric glaucoma. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6557077 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65570772019-06-26 Evaluation of optic canal anatomy and symmetry using CT Zhang, Xinxin Lee, Yueh Olson, Daniel Fleischman, David BMJ Open Ophthalmol Original Article OBJECTIVE: We aim to describe the anatomy and symmetry patterns of the optic canal in patients having undergone maxillofacial CT imaging. METHODS: In this retrospective chart review, we included all patients who received sinus and maxillofacial CT at the University of North Carolina hospitals between 2008 and 2016, without facial or cranial fractures or other medical conditions that would affect optic canal size. We measured the length of ≥75% enclosed canal, minimum cross-sectional area and minimum diameter bilaterally using iNtuition TeraRecon (Durham, North Carolina) and compared bilateral symmetry using a 20 % difference threshold. Each parameter above was compared among white, black, non-white and non-black patients. RESULTS: Of 335 patients, the mean canal length was 5.61±2.22 mm. The mean minimum area was 11.84±3.11 mm(2). The mean minimum diameter was 3.28±0.55 mm. A total of 39.4% (132/335) of patients had asymmetric canal lengths, 18.8% (63/335) had asymmetric minimum areas, and 12.5% (42/335) had asymmetric minimum diameters. No differences were found between racial groups. The right optic canal was larger than the left (right: 12.12 mm vs left: 11.55 mm, p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Optic canal asymmetry is not uncommon. It may affect risk of papilloedema severity, explain cases of unilateral or asymmetric papilloedema and possibly asymmetric glaucoma. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6557077/ /pubmed/31245611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2019-000302 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Zhang, Xinxin Lee, Yueh Olson, Daniel Fleischman, David Evaluation of optic canal anatomy and symmetry using CT |
title | Evaluation of optic canal anatomy and symmetry using CT |
title_full | Evaluation of optic canal anatomy and symmetry using CT |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of optic canal anatomy and symmetry using CT |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of optic canal anatomy and symmetry using CT |
title_short | Evaluation of optic canal anatomy and symmetry using CT |
title_sort | evaluation of optic canal anatomy and symmetry using ct |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6557077/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31245611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2019-000302 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangxinxin evaluationofopticcanalanatomyandsymmetryusingct AT leeyueh evaluationofopticcanalanatomyandsymmetryusingct AT olsondaniel evaluationofopticcanalanatomyandsymmetryusingct AT fleischmandavid evaluationofopticcanalanatomyandsymmetryusingct |