Cargando…

Evaluation of optic canal anatomy and symmetry using CT

OBJECTIVE: We aim to describe the anatomy and symmetry patterns of the optic canal in patients having undergone maxillofacial CT imaging. METHODS: In this retrospective chart review, we included all patients who received sinus and maxillofacial CT at the University of North Carolina hospitals betwee...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Xinxin, Lee, Yueh, Olson, Daniel, Fleischman, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6557077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31245611
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2019-000302
_version_ 1783425419035279360
author Zhang, Xinxin
Lee, Yueh
Olson, Daniel
Fleischman, David
author_facet Zhang, Xinxin
Lee, Yueh
Olson, Daniel
Fleischman, David
author_sort Zhang, Xinxin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: We aim to describe the anatomy and symmetry patterns of the optic canal in patients having undergone maxillofacial CT imaging. METHODS: In this retrospective chart review, we included all patients who received sinus and maxillofacial CT at the University of North Carolina hospitals between 2008 and 2016, without facial or cranial fractures or other medical conditions that would affect optic canal size. We measured the length of ≥75% enclosed canal, minimum cross-sectional area and minimum diameter bilaterally using iNtuition TeraRecon (Durham, North Carolina) and compared bilateral symmetry using a 20 % difference threshold. Each parameter above was compared among white, black, non-white and non-black patients. RESULTS: Of 335 patients, the mean canal length was 5.61±2.22 mm. The mean minimum area was 11.84±3.11 mm(2). The mean minimum diameter was 3.28±0.55 mm. A total of 39.4% (132/335) of patients had asymmetric canal lengths, 18.8% (63/335) had asymmetric minimum areas, and 12.5% (42/335) had asymmetric minimum diameters. No differences were found between racial groups. The right optic canal was larger than the left (right: 12.12 mm vs left: 11.55 mm, p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Optic canal asymmetry is not uncommon. It may affect risk of papilloedema severity, explain cases of unilateral or asymmetric papilloedema and possibly asymmetric glaucoma.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6557077
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65570772019-06-26 Evaluation of optic canal anatomy and symmetry using CT Zhang, Xinxin Lee, Yueh Olson, Daniel Fleischman, David BMJ Open Ophthalmol Original Article OBJECTIVE: We aim to describe the anatomy and symmetry patterns of the optic canal in patients having undergone maxillofacial CT imaging. METHODS: In this retrospective chart review, we included all patients who received sinus and maxillofacial CT at the University of North Carolina hospitals between 2008 and 2016, without facial or cranial fractures or other medical conditions that would affect optic canal size. We measured the length of ≥75% enclosed canal, minimum cross-sectional area and minimum diameter bilaterally using iNtuition TeraRecon (Durham, North Carolina) and compared bilateral symmetry using a 20 % difference threshold. Each parameter above was compared among white, black, non-white and non-black patients. RESULTS: Of 335 patients, the mean canal length was 5.61±2.22 mm. The mean minimum area was 11.84±3.11 mm(2). The mean minimum diameter was 3.28±0.55 mm. A total of 39.4% (132/335) of patients had asymmetric canal lengths, 18.8% (63/335) had asymmetric minimum areas, and 12.5% (42/335) had asymmetric minimum diameters. No differences were found between racial groups. The right optic canal was larger than the left (right: 12.12 mm vs left: 11.55 mm, p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Optic canal asymmetry is not uncommon. It may affect risk of papilloedema severity, explain cases of unilateral or asymmetric papilloedema and possibly asymmetric glaucoma. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6557077/ /pubmed/31245611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2019-000302 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Zhang, Xinxin
Lee, Yueh
Olson, Daniel
Fleischman, David
Evaluation of optic canal anatomy and symmetry using CT
title Evaluation of optic canal anatomy and symmetry using CT
title_full Evaluation of optic canal anatomy and symmetry using CT
title_fullStr Evaluation of optic canal anatomy and symmetry using CT
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of optic canal anatomy and symmetry using CT
title_short Evaluation of optic canal anatomy and symmetry using CT
title_sort evaluation of optic canal anatomy and symmetry using ct
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6557077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31245611
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2019-000302
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangxinxin evaluationofopticcanalanatomyandsymmetryusingct
AT leeyueh evaluationofopticcanalanatomyandsymmetryusingct
AT olsondaniel evaluationofopticcanalanatomyandsymmetryusingct
AT fleischmandavid evaluationofopticcanalanatomyandsymmetryusingct