Cargando…
Prospective analysis of 895 patients on a UK Genomics Review Board
BACKGROUND: The increasing frequency and complexity of cancer genomic profiling represents a challenge for the oncology community. Results from next-generation sequencing–based clinical tests require expert review to determine their clinical relevance and to ensure patients are stratified appropriat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6557082/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31245058 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2018-000469 |
_version_ | 1783425420204441600 |
---|---|
author | Moore, David Allan Kushnir, Marina Mak, Gabriel Winter, Helen Curiel, Teresa Voskoboynik, Mark Moschetta, Michele Rozumna-Martynyuk, Nataliya Balbi, Kevin Bennett, Philip Forster, Martin Kulkarni, Anjana Haynes, Debra Swanton, Charles Arkenau, Hendrik-Tobias |
author_facet | Moore, David Allan Kushnir, Marina Mak, Gabriel Winter, Helen Curiel, Teresa Voskoboynik, Mark Moschetta, Michele Rozumna-Martynyuk, Nataliya Balbi, Kevin Bennett, Philip Forster, Martin Kulkarni, Anjana Haynes, Debra Swanton, Charles Arkenau, Hendrik-Tobias |
author_sort | Moore, David Allan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The increasing frequency and complexity of cancer genomic profiling represents a challenge for the oncology community. Results from next-generation sequencing–based clinical tests require expert review to determine their clinical relevance and to ensure patients are stratified appropriately to established therapies or clinical trials. METHODS: The Sarah Cannon Research Institute UK/UCL Genomics Review Board (GRB) was established in 2014 and represents a multidisciplinary team with expertise in molecular oncology, clinical trials, clinical cancer genetics and molecular pathology. Prospective data from this board were collated. RESULTS: To date, 895 patients have been reviewed by the GRB, of whom 180 (20%) were referred for clinical trial screening and 62 (7%) received trial therapy. For a further 106, a clinical trial recommendation was given. CONCLUSIONS: Numerous challenges are faced in implementing a GRB, including the identification of potential germline variants, the interpretation of variants of uncertain significance and consideration of the technical limitations of pathology material when interpreting results. These challenges are likely to be encountered with increasing frequency in routine practice. This GRB experience provides a model for the multidisciplinary review of molecular profiling data and for the linking of molecular analysis to clinical trial networks. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6557082 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65570822019-06-26 Prospective analysis of 895 patients on a UK Genomics Review Board Moore, David Allan Kushnir, Marina Mak, Gabriel Winter, Helen Curiel, Teresa Voskoboynik, Mark Moschetta, Michele Rozumna-Martynyuk, Nataliya Balbi, Kevin Bennett, Philip Forster, Martin Kulkarni, Anjana Haynes, Debra Swanton, Charles Arkenau, Hendrik-Tobias ESMO Open Original Research BACKGROUND: The increasing frequency and complexity of cancer genomic profiling represents a challenge for the oncology community. Results from next-generation sequencing–based clinical tests require expert review to determine their clinical relevance and to ensure patients are stratified appropriately to established therapies or clinical trials. METHODS: The Sarah Cannon Research Institute UK/UCL Genomics Review Board (GRB) was established in 2014 and represents a multidisciplinary team with expertise in molecular oncology, clinical trials, clinical cancer genetics and molecular pathology. Prospective data from this board were collated. RESULTS: To date, 895 patients have been reviewed by the GRB, of whom 180 (20%) were referred for clinical trial screening and 62 (7%) received trial therapy. For a further 106, a clinical trial recommendation was given. CONCLUSIONS: Numerous challenges are faced in implementing a GRB, including the identification of potential germline variants, the interpretation of variants of uncertain significance and consideration of the technical limitations of pathology material when interpreting results. These challenges are likely to be encountered with increasing frequency in routine practice. This GRB experience provides a model for the multidisciplinary review of molecular profiling data and for the linking of molecular analysis to clinical trial networks. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6557082/ /pubmed/31245058 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2018-000469 Text en © Author (s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. Published by BMJ on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, any changes made are indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Moore, David Allan Kushnir, Marina Mak, Gabriel Winter, Helen Curiel, Teresa Voskoboynik, Mark Moschetta, Michele Rozumna-Martynyuk, Nataliya Balbi, Kevin Bennett, Philip Forster, Martin Kulkarni, Anjana Haynes, Debra Swanton, Charles Arkenau, Hendrik-Tobias Prospective analysis of 895 patients on a UK Genomics Review Board |
title | Prospective analysis of 895 patients on a UK Genomics Review Board |
title_full | Prospective analysis of 895 patients on a UK Genomics Review Board |
title_fullStr | Prospective analysis of 895 patients on a UK Genomics Review Board |
title_full_unstemmed | Prospective analysis of 895 patients on a UK Genomics Review Board |
title_short | Prospective analysis of 895 patients on a UK Genomics Review Board |
title_sort | prospective analysis of 895 patients on a uk genomics review board |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6557082/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31245058 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2018-000469 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mooredavidallan prospectiveanalysisof895patientsonaukgenomicsreviewboard AT kushnirmarina prospectiveanalysisof895patientsonaukgenomicsreviewboard AT makgabriel prospectiveanalysisof895patientsonaukgenomicsreviewboard AT winterhelen prospectiveanalysisof895patientsonaukgenomicsreviewboard AT curielteresa prospectiveanalysisof895patientsonaukgenomicsreviewboard AT voskoboynikmark prospectiveanalysisof895patientsonaukgenomicsreviewboard AT moschettamichele prospectiveanalysisof895patientsonaukgenomicsreviewboard AT rozumnamartynyuknataliya prospectiveanalysisof895patientsonaukgenomicsreviewboard AT balbikevin prospectiveanalysisof895patientsonaukgenomicsreviewboard AT bennettphilip prospectiveanalysisof895patientsonaukgenomicsreviewboard AT forstermartin prospectiveanalysisof895patientsonaukgenomicsreviewboard AT kulkarnianjana prospectiveanalysisof895patientsonaukgenomicsreviewboard AT haynesdebra prospectiveanalysisof895patientsonaukgenomicsreviewboard AT swantoncharles prospectiveanalysisof895patientsonaukgenomicsreviewboard AT arkenauhendriktobias prospectiveanalysisof895patientsonaukgenomicsreviewboard |