Cargando…

Prospective analysis of 895 patients on a UK Genomics Review Board

BACKGROUND: The increasing frequency and complexity of cancer genomic profiling represents a challenge for the oncology community. Results from next-generation sequencing–based clinical tests require expert review to determine their clinical relevance and to ensure patients are stratified appropriat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moore, David Allan, Kushnir, Marina, Mak, Gabriel, Winter, Helen, Curiel, Teresa, Voskoboynik, Mark, Moschetta, Michele, Rozumna-Martynyuk, Nataliya, Balbi, Kevin, Bennett, Philip, Forster, Martin, Kulkarni, Anjana, Haynes, Debra, Swanton, Charles, Arkenau, Hendrik-Tobias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6557082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31245058
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2018-000469
_version_ 1783425420204441600
author Moore, David Allan
Kushnir, Marina
Mak, Gabriel
Winter, Helen
Curiel, Teresa
Voskoboynik, Mark
Moschetta, Michele
Rozumna-Martynyuk, Nataliya
Balbi, Kevin
Bennett, Philip
Forster, Martin
Kulkarni, Anjana
Haynes, Debra
Swanton, Charles
Arkenau, Hendrik-Tobias
author_facet Moore, David Allan
Kushnir, Marina
Mak, Gabriel
Winter, Helen
Curiel, Teresa
Voskoboynik, Mark
Moschetta, Michele
Rozumna-Martynyuk, Nataliya
Balbi, Kevin
Bennett, Philip
Forster, Martin
Kulkarni, Anjana
Haynes, Debra
Swanton, Charles
Arkenau, Hendrik-Tobias
author_sort Moore, David Allan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The increasing frequency and complexity of cancer genomic profiling represents a challenge for the oncology community. Results from next-generation sequencing–based clinical tests require expert review to determine their clinical relevance and to ensure patients are stratified appropriately to established therapies or clinical trials. METHODS: The Sarah Cannon Research Institute UK/UCL Genomics Review Board (GRB) was established in 2014 and represents a multidisciplinary team with expertise in molecular oncology, clinical trials, clinical cancer genetics and molecular pathology. Prospective data from this board were collated. RESULTS: To date, 895 patients have been reviewed by the GRB, of whom 180 (20%) were referred for clinical trial screening and 62 (7%) received trial therapy. For a further 106, a clinical trial recommendation was given. CONCLUSIONS: Numerous challenges are faced in implementing a GRB, including the identification of potential germline variants, the interpretation of variants of uncertain significance and consideration of the technical limitations of pathology material when interpreting results. These challenges are likely to be encountered with increasing frequency in routine practice. This GRB experience provides a model for the multidisciplinary review of molecular profiling data and for the linking of molecular analysis to clinical trial networks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6557082
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65570822019-06-26 Prospective analysis of 895 patients on a UK Genomics Review Board Moore, David Allan Kushnir, Marina Mak, Gabriel Winter, Helen Curiel, Teresa Voskoboynik, Mark Moschetta, Michele Rozumna-Martynyuk, Nataliya Balbi, Kevin Bennett, Philip Forster, Martin Kulkarni, Anjana Haynes, Debra Swanton, Charles Arkenau, Hendrik-Tobias ESMO Open Original Research BACKGROUND: The increasing frequency and complexity of cancer genomic profiling represents a challenge for the oncology community. Results from next-generation sequencing–based clinical tests require expert review to determine their clinical relevance and to ensure patients are stratified appropriately to established therapies or clinical trials. METHODS: The Sarah Cannon Research Institute UK/UCL Genomics Review Board (GRB) was established in 2014 and represents a multidisciplinary team with expertise in molecular oncology, clinical trials, clinical cancer genetics and molecular pathology. Prospective data from this board were collated. RESULTS: To date, 895 patients have been reviewed by the GRB, of whom 180 (20%) were referred for clinical trial screening and 62 (7%) received trial therapy. For a further 106, a clinical trial recommendation was given. CONCLUSIONS: Numerous challenges are faced in implementing a GRB, including the identification of potential germline variants, the interpretation of variants of uncertain significance and consideration of the technical limitations of pathology material when interpreting results. These challenges are likely to be encountered with increasing frequency in routine practice. This GRB experience provides a model for the multidisciplinary review of molecular profiling data and for the linking of molecular analysis to clinical trial networks. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6557082/ /pubmed/31245058 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2018-000469 Text en © Author (s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. Published by BMJ on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, any changes made are indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Moore, David Allan
Kushnir, Marina
Mak, Gabriel
Winter, Helen
Curiel, Teresa
Voskoboynik, Mark
Moschetta, Michele
Rozumna-Martynyuk, Nataliya
Balbi, Kevin
Bennett, Philip
Forster, Martin
Kulkarni, Anjana
Haynes, Debra
Swanton, Charles
Arkenau, Hendrik-Tobias
Prospective analysis of 895 patients on a UK Genomics Review Board
title Prospective analysis of 895 patients on a UK Genomics Review Board
title_full Prospective analysis of 895 patients on a UK Genomics Review Board
title_fullStr Prospective analysis of 895 patients on a UK Genomics Review Board
title_full_unstemmed Prospective analysis of 895 patients on a UK Genomics Review Board
title_short Prospective analysis of 895 patients on a UK Genomics Review Board
title_sort prospective analysis of 895 patients on a uk genomics review board
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6557082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31245058
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2018-000469
work_keys_str_mv AT mooredavidallan prospectiveanalysisof895patientsonaukgenomicsreviewboard
AT kushnirmarina prospectiveanalysisof895patientsonaukgenomicsreviewboard
AT makgabriel prospectiveanalysisof895patientsonaukgenomicsreviewboard
AT winterhelen prospectiveanalysisof895patientsonaukgenomicsreviewboard
AT curielteresa prospectiveanalysisof895patientsonaukgenomicsreviewboard
AT voskoboynikmark prospectiveanalysisof895patientsonaukgenomicsreviewboard
AT moschettamichele prospectiveanalysisof895patientsonaukgenomicsreviewboard
AT rozumnamartynyuknataliya prospectiveanalysisof895patientsonaukgenomicsreviewboard
AT balbikevin prospectiveanalysisof895patientsonaukgenomicsreviewboard
AT bennettphilip prospectiveanalysisof895patientsonaukgenomicsreviewboard
AT forstermartin prospectiveanalysisof895patientsonaukgenomicsreviewboard
AT kulkarnianjana prospectiveanalysisof895patientsonaukgenomicsreviewboard
AT haynesdebra prospectiveanalysisof895patientsonaukgenomicsreviewboard
AT swantoncharles prospectiveanalysisof895patientsonaukgenomicsreviewboard
AT arkenauhendriktobias prospectiveanalysisof895patientsonaukgenomicsreviewboard