Cargando…

Natural and Artificial Selection for Parasitoid Resistance in Drosophila melanogaster Leave Different Genetic Signatures

Adaptation of complex traits depends on standing genetic variation at multiple loci. The allelic variants that have positive fitness effects, however, can differ depending on the genetic background and the selective pressure. Previously, we interrogated the Drosophila melanogaster genome at the popu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gerritsma, Sylvia, Jalvingh, Kirsten M., van de Beld, Carmen, Beerda, Jelmer, van de Zande, Louis, Vrieling, Klaas, Wertheim, Bregje
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6557190/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31214243
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.00479
_version_ 1783425434200834048
author Gerritsma, Sylvia
Jalvingh, Kirsten M.
van de Beld, Carmen
Beerda, Jelmer
van de Zande, Louis
Vrieling, Klaas
Wertheim, Bregje
author_facet Gerritsma, Sylvia
Jalvingh, Kirsten M.
van de Beld, Carmen
Beerda, Jelmer
van de Zande, Louis
Vrieling, Klaas
Wertheim, Bregje
author_sort Gerritsma, Sylvia
collection PubMed
description Adaptation of complex traits depends on standing genetic variation at multiple loci. The allelic variants that have positive fitness effects, however, can differ depending on the genetic background and the selective pressure. Previously, we interrogated the Drosophila melanogaster genome at the population level for polymorphic positions and identified 215 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that had significantly changed in frequency after experimental evolution for increased parasitoid resistance. In the current study, we follow up on 11 of these SNPs as putative targets of the experimental selection process (Jalvingh et al., 2014). We study the patterns of genetic variation for these SNPs in several European field populations. Furthermore, we associate the genetic variation of these SNPs to variation in resistance against the parasitoid Asobara tabida, by determining the individual phenotype and SNP genotype for 144 individuals from four Selection lines and four non-selected Control lines and for 400 individuals from 12 Field lines that differ in parasitoid resistance. For the Selection lines we additionally monitored the changes in allele frequencies throughout the five generations of experimental selection. For three genes, mbl (Zn-finger protein), mthl4 (G-protein coupled receptor) and CG17287 (protein-cysteine S-palmitoyltransferase) individual SNP genotypes were significantly associated with resistance level in the Selection and Control lines. Additionally, the minor allele in mbl and mthl4 were consistently and gradually favored throughout the five generations of experimental evolution. However, none of these alleles did appear to be associated to high resistance in the Field lines. We suggest that, within field populations, selection for parasitoid resistance is a gradual process that involves co-adapted gene complexes. Fast artificial selection, however, enforces the sudden cumulating of particular alleles that confer high resistance (genetic sweep). We discuss our findings in the context of local adaptation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6557190
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65571902019-06-18 Natural and Artificial Selection for Parasitoid Resistance in Drosophila melanogaster Leave Different Genetic Signatures Gerritsma, Sylvia Jalvingh, Kirsten M. van de Beld, Carmen Beerda, Jelmer van de Zande, Louis Vrieling, Klaas Wertheim, Bregje Front Genet Genetics Adaptation of complex traits depends on standing genetic variation at multiple loci. The allelic variants that have positive fitness effects, however, can differ depending on the genetic background and the selective pressure. Previously, we interrogated the Drosophila melanogaster genome at the population level for polymorphic positions and identified 215 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that had significantly changed in frequency after experimental evolution for increased parasitoid resistance. In the current study, we follow up on 11 of these SNPs as putative targets of the experimental selection process (Jalvingh et al., 2014). We study the patterns of genetic variation for these SNPs in several European field populations. Furthermore, we associate the genetic variation of these SNPs to variation in resistance against the parasitoid Asobara tabida, by determining the individual phenotype and SNP genotype for 144 individuals from four Selection lines and four non-selected Control lines and for 400 individuals from 12 Field lines that differ in parasitoid resistance. For the Selection lines we additionally monitored the changes in allele frequencies throughout the five generations of experimental selection. For three genes, mbl (Zn-finger protein), mthl4 (G-protein coupled receptor) and CG17287 (protein-cysteine S-palmitoyltransferase) individual SNP genotypes were significantly associated with resistance level in the Selection and Control lines. Additionally, the minor allele in mbl and mthl4 were consistently and gradually favored throughout the five generations of experimental evolution. However, none of these alleles did appear to be associated to high resistance in the Field lines. We suggest that, within field populations, selection for parasitoid resistance is a gradual process that involves co-adapted gene complexes. Fast artificial selection, however, enforces the sudden cumulating of particular alleles that confer high resistance (genetic sweep). We discuss our findings in the context of local adaptation. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6557190/ /pubmed/31214243 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.00479 Text en Copyright © 2019 Gerritsma, Jalvingh, van de Beld, Beerda, van de Zande, Vrieling and Wertheim. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Genetics
Gerritsma, Sylvia
Jalvingh, Kirsten M.
van de Beld, Carmen
Beerda, Jelmer
van de Zande, Louis
Vrieling, Klaas
Wertheim, Bregje
Natural and Artificial Selection for Parasitoid Resistance in Drosophila melanogaster Leave Different Genetic Signatures
title Natural and Artificial Selection for Parasitoid Resistance in Drosophila melanogaster Leave Different Genetic Signatures
title_full Natural and Artificial Selection for Parasitoid Resistance in Drosophila melanogaster Leave Different Genetic Signatures
title_fullStr Natural and Artificial Selection for Parasitoid Resistance in Drosophila melanogaster Leave Different Genetic Signatures
title_full_unstemmed Natural and Artificial Selection for Parasitoid Resistance in Drosophila melanogaster Leave Different Genetic Signatures
title_short Natural and Artificial Selection for Parasitoid Resistance in Drosophila melanogaster Leave Different Genetic Signatures
title_sort natural and artificial selection for parasitoid resistance in drosophila melanogaster leave different genetic signatures
topic Genetics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6557190/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31214243
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.00479
work_keys_str_mv AT gerritsmasylvia naturalandartificialselectionforparasitoidresistanceindrosophilamelanogasterleavedifferentgeneticsignatures
AT jalvinghkirstenm naturalandartificialselectionforparasitoidresistanceindrosophilamelanogasterleavedifferentgeneticsignatures
AT vandebeldcarmen naturalandartificialselectionforparasitoidresistanceindrosophilamelanogasterleavedifferentgeneticsignatures
AT beerdajelmer naturalandartificialselectionforparasitoidresistanceindrosophilamelanogasterleavedifferentgeneticsignatures
AT vandezandelouis naturalandartificialselectionforparasitoidresistanceindrosophilamelanogasterleavedifferentgeneticsignatures
AT vrielingklaas naturalandartificialselectionforparasitoidresistanceindrosophilamelanogasterleavedifferentgeneticsignatures
AT wertheimbregje naturalandartificialselectionforparasitoidresistanceindrosophilamelanogasterleavedifferentgeneticsignatures