Cargando…

Accountability for funds for Nurturing Care: what can we measure?

BACKGROUND: Understanding donor, government and out-of-pocket funding for early child development (ECD) is important for tracking progress. We aimed to estimate a baseline for the WHO, UNICEF and World Bank Nurturing Care Framework (NCF) with a special focus on childhood disability. METHODS: To esti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arregoces, Leonardo, Hughes, Rob, Milner, Kate M, Ponce Hardy, Victoria, Tann, Cally, Upadhyay, Arjun, Lawn, Joy E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6557225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30885964
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2018-315429
_version_ 1783425441487388672
author Arregoces, Leonardo
Hughes, Rob
Milner, Kate M
Ponce Hardy, Victoria
Tann, Cally
Upadhyay, Arjun
Lawn, Joy E
author_facet Arregoces, Leonardo
Hughes, Rob
Milner, Kate M
Ponce Hardy, Victoria
Tann, Cally
Upadhyay, Arjun
Lawn, Joy E
author_sort Arregoces, Leonardo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Understanding donor, government and out-of-pocket funding for early child development (ECD) is important for tracking progress. We aimed to estimate a baseline for the WHO, UNICEF and World Bank Nurturing Care Framework (NCF) with a special focus on childhood disability. METHODS: To estimate development assistance spending, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development’s Creditor Reporting System (OECD-CRS) database was searched for 2007–2016, using key words derived from domains of the NCF (good health, nutrition and growth, responsive caregiving, security and safety, and early learning), plus disability. Associated funds were analysed by domain, donor, recipient and region. Trends of ECD/NCF were compared with reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health (RMNCH) disbursements. To assess domestic or out-of-pocket expenditure for ECD, we searched electronic databases of indexed and grey literature. RESULTS: US$79.1 billion of development assistance were disbursed, mostly for health and nutrition (US$61.9 billion, 78% of total) and least for disability (US$0.7 billion, 2% of total). US$2.3 per child per year were disbursed for non-health ECD activities. Total development assistance for ECD increased by 121% between 2007 and 2016, an average increase of 8.3% annually. Per child disbursements increased more in Africa and Asia, while minimally in Latin America and the Caribbean and Oceania. We could not find comparable sources for domestic funding and out-of-pocket expenditure. CONCLUSIONS: Estimated international donor disbursements for ECD remain small compared with RMNCH. Limitations include inconsistent donor terminology in OECD data. Increased investment will be required in the poorest countries and for childhood disability to ensure that progress is equitable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6557225
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65572252019-06-26 Accountability for funds for Nurturing Care: what can we measure? Arregoces, Leonardo Hughes, Rob Milner, Kate M Ponce Hardy, Victoria Tann, Cally Upadhyay, Arjun Lawn, Joy E Arch Dis Child Global child health: Design and implementation for early child development programmes P4 BACKGROUND: Understanding donor, government and out-of-pocket funding for early child development (ECD) is important for tracking progress. We aimed to estimate a baseline for the WHO, UNICEF and World Bank Nurturing Care Framework (NCF) with a special focus on childhood disability. METHODS: To estimate development assistance spending, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development’s Creditor Reporting System (OECD-CRS) database was searched for 2007–2016, using key words derived from domains of the NCF (good health, nutrition and growth, responsive caregiving, security and safety, and early learning), plus disability. Associated funds were analysed by domain, donor, recipient and region. Trends of ECD/NCF were compared with reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health (RMNCH) disbursements. To assess domestic or out-of-pocket expenditure for ECD, we searched electronic databases of indexed and grey literature. RESULTS: US$79.1 billion of development assistance were disbursed, mostly for health and nutrition (US$61.9 billion, 78% of total) and least for disability (US$0.7 billion, 2% of total). US$2.3 per child per year were disbursed for non-health ECD activities. Total development assistance for ECD increased by 121% between 2007 and 2016, an average increase of 8.3% annually. Per child disbursements increased more in Africa and Asia, while minimally in Latin America and the Caribbean and Oceania. We could not find comparable sources for domestic funding and out-of-pocket expenditure. CONCLUSIONS: Estimated international donor disbursements for ECD remain small compared with RMNCH. Limitations include inconsistent donor terminology in OECD data. Increased investment will be required in the poorest countries and for childhood disability to ensure that progress is equitable. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-04 2019-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6557225/ /pubmed/30885964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2018-315429 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Global child health: Design and implementation for early child development programmes P4
Arregoces, Leonardo
Hughes, Rob
Milner, Kate M
Ponce Hardy, Victoria
Tann, Cally
Upadhyay, Arjun
Lawn, Joy E
Accountability for funds for Nurturing Care: what can we measure?
title Accountability for funds for Nurturing Care: what can we measure?
title_full Accountability for funds for Nurturing Care: what can we measure?
title_fullStr Accountability for funds for Nurturing Care: what can we measure?
title_full_unstemmed Accountability for funds for Nurturing Care: what can we measure?
title_short Accountability for funds for Nurturing Care: what can we measure?
title_sort accountability for funds for nurturing care: what can we measure?
topic Global child health: Design and implementation for early child development programmes P4
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6557225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30885964
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2018-315429
work_keys_str_mv AT arregocesleonardo accountabilityforfundsfornurturingcarewhatcanwemeasure
AT hughesrob accountabilityforfundsfornurturingcarewhatcanwemeasure
AT milnerkatem accountabilityforfundsfornurturingcarewhatcanwemeasure
AT poncehardyvictoria accountabilityforfundsfornurturingcarewhatcanwemeasure
AT tanncally accountabilityforfundsfornurturingcarewhatcanwemeasure
AT upadhyayarjun accountabilityforfundsfornurturingcarewhatcanwemeasure
AT lawnjoye accountabilityforfundsfornurturingcarewhatcanwemeasure