Cargando…
Accountability for funds for Nurturing Care: what can we measure?
BACKGROUND: Understanding donor, government and out-of-pocket funding for early child development (ECD) is important for tracking progress. We aimed to estimate a baseline for the WHO, UNICEF and World Bank Nurturing Care Framework (NCF) with a special focus on childhood disability. METHODS: To esti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6557225/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30885964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2018-315429 |
_version_ | 1783425441487388672 |
---|---|
author | Arregoces, Leonardo Hughes, Rob Milner, Kate M Ponce Hardy, Victoria Tann, Cally Upadhyay, Arjun Lawn, Joy E |
author_facet | Arregoces, Leonardo Hughes, Rob Milner, Kate M Ponce Hardy, Victoria Tann, Cally Upadhyay, Arjun Lawn, Joy E |
author_sort | Arregoces, Leonardo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Understanding donor, government and out-of-pocket funding for early child development (ECD) is important for tracking progress. We aimed to estimate a baseline for the WHO, UNICEF and World Bank Nurturing Care Framework (NCF) with a special focus on childhood disability. METHODS: To estimate development assistance spending, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development’s Creditor Reporting System (OECD-CRS) database was searched for 2007–2016, using key words derived from domains of the NCF (good health, nutrition and growth, responsive caregiving, security and safety, and early learning), plus disability. Associated funds were analysed by domain, donor, recipient and region. Trends of ECD/NCF were compared with reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health (RMNCH) disbursements. To assess domestic or out-of-pocket expenditure for ECD, we searched electronic databases of indexed and grey literature. RESULTS: US$79.1 billion of development assistance were disbursed, mostly for health and nutrition (US$61.9 billion, 78% of total) and least for disability (US$0.7 billion, 2% of total). US$2.3 per child per year were disbursed for non-health ECD activities. Total development assistance for ECD increased by 121% between 2007 and 2016, an average increase of 8.3% annually. Per child disbursements increased more in Africa and Asia, while minimally in Latin America and the Caribbean and Oceania. We could not find comparable sources for domestic funding and out-of-pocket expenditure. CONCLUSIONS: Estimated international donor disbursements for ECD remain small compared with RMNCH. Limitations include inconsistent donor terminology in OECD data. Increased investment will be required in the poorest countries and for childhood disability to ensure that progress is equitable. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6557225 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65572252019-06-26 Accountability for funds for Nurturing Care: what can we measure? Arregoces, Leonardo Hughes, Rob Milner, Kate M Ponce Hardy, Victoria Tann, Cally Upadhyay, Arjun Lawn, Joy E Arch Dis Child Global child health: Design and implementation for early child development programmes P4 BACKGROUND: Understanding donor, government and out-of-pocket funding for early child development (ECD) is important for tracking progress. We aimed to estimate a baseline for the WHO, UNICEF and World Bank Nurturing Care Framework (NCF) with a special focus on childhood disability. METHODS: To estimate development assistance spending, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development’s Creditor Reporting System (OECD-CRS) database was searched for 2007–2016, using key words derived from domains of the NCF (good health, nutrition and growth, responsive caregiving, security and safety, and early learning), plus disability. Associated funds were analysed by domain, donor, recipient and region. Trends of ECD/NCF were compared with reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health (RMNCH) disbursements. To assess domestic or out-of-pocket expenditure for ECD, we searched electronic databases of indexed and grey literature. RESULTS: US$79.1 billion of development assistance were disbursed, mostly for health and nutrition (US$61.9 billion, 78% of total) and least for disability (US$0.7 billion, 2% of total). US$2.3 per child per year were disbursed for non-health ECD activities. Total development assistance for ECD increased by 121% between 2007 and 2016, an average increase of 8.3% annually. Per child disbursements increased more in Africa and Asia, while minimally in Latin America and the Caribbean and Oceania. We could not find comparable sources for domestic funding and out-of-pocket expenditure. CONCLUSIONS: Estimated international donor disbursements for ECD remain small compared with RMNCH. Limitations include inconsistent donor terminology in OECD data. Increased investment will be required in the poorest countries and for childhood disability to ensure that progress is equitable. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-04 2019-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6557225/ /pubmed/30885964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2018-315429 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Global child health: Design and implementation for early child development programmes P4 Arregoces, Leonardo Hughes, Rob Milner, Kate M Ponce Hardy, Victoria Tann, Cally Upadhyay, Arjun Lawn, Joy E Accountability for funds for Nurturing Care: what can we measure? |
title | Accountability for funds for Nurturing Care: what can we measure? |
title_full | Accountability for funds for Nurturing Care: what can we measure? |
title_fullStr | Accountability for funds for Nurturing Care: what can we measure? |
title_full_unstemmed | Accountability for funds for Nurturing Care: what can we measure? |
title_short | Accountability for funds for Nurturing Care: what can we measure? |
title_sort | accountability for funds for nurturing care: what can we measure? |
topic | Global child health: Design and implementation for early child development programmes P4 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6557225/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30885964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2018-315429 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT arregocesleonardo accountabilityforfundsfornurturingcarewhatcanwemeasure AT hughesrob accountabilityforfundsfornurturingcarewhatcanwemeasure AT milnerkatem accountabilityforfundsfornurturingcarewhatcanwemeasure AT poncehardyvictoria accountabilityforfundsfornurturingcarewhatcanwemeasure AT tanncally accountabilityforfundsfornurturingcarewhatcanwemeasure AT upadhyayarjun accountabilityforfundsfornurturingcarewhatcanwemeasure AT lawnjoye accountabilityforfundsfornurturingcarewhatcanwemeasure |