Cargando…
Restricted fluid bolus volume in early septic shock: results of the Fluids in Shock pilot trial
OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of Fluids in Shock, a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of restricted fluid bolus volume (10 mL/kg) versus recommended practice (20 mL/kg). DESIGN: Nine-month pilot RCT with embedded mixed-method perspectives study. SETTING: 13 hospitals in England. PATIENTS:...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6557227/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30087153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2018-314924 |
_version_ | 1783425441961345024 |
---|---|
author | Inwald, David Philip Canter, Ruth Woolfall, Kerry Mouncey, Paul Zenasni, Zohra O’Hara, Caitlin Carter, Anjali Jones, Nicola Lyttle, Mark D Nadel, Simon Peters, Mark J Harrison, David A Rowan, Kathryn M |
author_facet | Inwald, David Philip Canter, Ruth Woolfall, Kerry Mouncey, Paul Zenasni, Zohra O’Hara, Caitlin Carter, Anjali Jones, Nicola Lyttle, Mark D Nadel, Simon Peters, Mark J Harrison, David A Rowan, Kathryn M |
author_sort | Inwald, David Philip |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of Fluids in Shock, a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of restricted fluid bolus volume (10 mL/kg) versus recommended practice (20 mL/kg). DESIGN: Nine-month pilot RCT with embedded mixed-method perspectives study. SETTING: 13 hospitals in England. PATIENTS: Children presenting to emergency departments with suspected infection and shock after 20 mL/kg fluid. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to further 10 or 20 mL/kg fluid boluses every 15 min for up to 4 hours if still in shock. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: These were based on progression criteria, including recruitment and retention, protocol adherence, separation, potential trial outcome measures, and parent and staff perspectives. RESULTS: Seventy-five participants were randomised; two were withdrawn. 23 (59%) of 39 in the 10 mL/kg arm and 25 (74%) of 34 in the 20 mL/kg arm required a single trial bolus before the shock resolved. 79% of boluses were delivered per protocol in the 10 mL/kg arm and 55% in the 20 mL/kg arm. The volume of study bolus fluid after 4 hours was 44% lower in the 10 mL/kg group (mean 14.5 vs 27.5 mL/kg). The Paediatric Index of Mortality-2 score was 2.1 (IQR 1.6–2.7) in the 10 mL/kg group and 2.0 (IQR 1.6–2.5) in the 20 mL/kg group. There were no deaths. Length of hospital stay, paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admissions and PICU-free days at 30 days did not differ significantly between the groups. In the perspectives study, the trial was generally supported, although some problems with protocol adherence were described. CONCLUSIONS: Participants were not as unwell as expected. A larger trial is not feasible in its current design in the UK. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN15244462. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6557227 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65572272019-06-26 Restricted fluid bolus volume in early septic shock: results of the Fluids in Shock pilot trial Inwald, David Philip Canter, Ruth Woolfall, Kerry Mouncey, Paul Zenasni, Zohra O’Hara, Caitlin Carter, Anjali Jones, Nicola Lyttle, Mark D Nadel, Simon Peters, Mark J Harrison, David A Rowan, Kathryn M Arch Dis Child Original Article OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of Fluids in Shock, a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of restricted fluid bolus volume (10 mL/kg) versus recommended practice (20 mL/kg). DESIGN: Nine-month pilot RCT with embedded mixed-method perspectives study. SETTING: 13 hospitals in England. PATIENTS: Children presenting to emergency departments with suspected infection and shock after 20 mL/kg fluid. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to further 10 or 20 mL/kg fluid boluses every 15 min for up to 4 hours if still in shock. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: These were based on progression criteria, including recruitment and retention, protocol adherence, separation, potential trial outcome measures, and parent and staff perspectives. RESULTS: Seventy-five participants were randomised; two were withdrawn. 23 (59%) of 39 in the 10 mL/kg arm and 25 (74%) of 34 in the 20 mL/kg arm required a single trial bolus before the shock resolved. 79% of boluses were delivered per protocol in the 10 mL/kg arm and 55% in the 20 mL/kg arm. The volume of study bolus fluid after 4 hours was 44% lower in the 10 mL/kg group (mean 14.5 vs 27.5 mL/kg). The Paediatric Index of Mortality-2 score was 2.1 (IQR 1.6–2.7) in the 10 mL/kg group and 2.0 (IQR 1.6–2.5) in the 20 mL/kg group. There were no deaths. Length of hospital stay, paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admissions and PICU-free days at 30 days did not differ significantly between the groups. In the perspectives study, the trial was generally supported, although some problems with protocol adherence were described. CONCLUSIONS: Participants were not as unwell as expected. A larger trial is not feasible in its current design in the UK. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN15244462. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-05 2018-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6557227/ /pubmed/30087153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2018-314924 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Inwald, David Philip Canter, Ruth Woolfall, Kerry Mouncey, Paul Zenasni, Zohra O’Hara, Caitlin Carter, Anjali Jones, Nicola Lyttle, Mark D Nadel, Simon Peters, Mark J Harrison, David A Rowan, Kathryn M Restricted fluid bolus volume in early septic shock: results of the Fluids in Shock pilot trial |
title | Restricted fluid bolus volume in early septic shock: results of the Fluids in Shock pilot trial |
title_full | Restricted fluid bolus volume in early septic shock: results of the Fluids in Shock pilot trial |
title_fullStr | Restricted fluid bolus volume in early septic shock: results of the Fluids in Shock pilot trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Restricted fluid bolus volume in early septic shock: results of the Fluids in Shock pilot trial |
title_short | Restricted fluid bolus volume in early septic shock: results of the Fluids in Shock pilot trial |
title_sort | restricted fluid bolus volume in early septic shock: results of the fluids in shock pilot trial |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6557227/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30087153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2018-314924 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT inwalddavidphilip restrictedfluidbolusvolumeinearlysepticshockresultsofthefluidsinshockpilottrial AT canterruth restrictedfluidbolusvolumeinearlysepticshockresultsofthefluidsinshockpilottrial AT woolfallkerry restrictedfluidbolusvolumeinearlysepticshockresultsofthefluidsinshockpilottrial AT mounceypaul restrictedfluidbolusvolumeinearlysepticshockresultsofthefluidsinshockpilottrial AT zenasnizohra restrictedfluidbolusvolumeinearlysepticshockresultsofthefluidsinshockpilottrial AT oharacaitlin restrictedfluidbolusvolumeinearlysepticshockresultsofthefluidsinshockpilottrial AT carteranjali restrictedfluidbolusvolumeinearlysepticshockresultsofthefluidsinshockpilottrial AT jonesnicola restrictedfluidbolusvolumeinearlysepticshockresultsofthefluidsinshockpilottrial AT lyttlemarkd restrictedfluidbolusvolumeinearlysepticshockresultsofthefluidsinshockpilottrial AT nadelsimon restrictedfluidbolusvolumeinearlysepticshockresultsofthefluidsinshockpilottrial AT petersmarkj restrictedfluidbolusvolumeinearlysepticshockresultsofthefluidsinshockpilottrial AT harrisondavida restrictedfluidbolusvolumeinearlysepticshockresultsofthefluidsinshockpilottrial AT rowankathrynm restrictedfluidbolusvolumeinearlysepticshockresultsofthefluidsinshockpilottrial |