Cargando…

Live-odds gambling advertising and consumer protection

In-play gambling is a recent innovation allowing gambling to occur during the course of a sporting event, rather than merely before play commences. For years, in-play gambling has been marketed in the UK via adverts displaying current betting odds during breaks in televised soccer, e.g., “England to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Newall, Philip W. S., Thobhani, Ankush, Walasek, Lukasz, Meyer, Caroline
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6557471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31181084
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216876
_version_ 1783425452879118336
author Newall, Philip W. S.
Thobhani, Ankush
Walasek, Lukasz
Meyer, Caroline
author_facet Newall, Philip W. S.
Thobhani, Ankush
Walasek, Lukasz
Meyer, Caroline
author_sort Newall, Philip W. S.
collection PubMed
description In-play gambling is a recent innovation allowing gambling to occur during the course of a sporting event, rather than merely before play commences. For years, in-play gambling has been marketed in the UK via adverts displaying current betting odds during breaks in televised soccer, e.g., “England to score in the first 20 minutes, 4-to-1.” Previous research shows that this so-called “live-odds” advertising is skewed toward complex events with high profit margins which consumers do not evaluate rationally. Recent UK regulatory guidance on “impulsiveness and urgency,” aiming to enhance consumer protection around gambling advertising, states that gambling advertising should not “unduly pressure the audience to gamble.” We explored the frequency and content of live-odds advertising over the 2018 soccer World Cup, as a case study of the first major televised sporting event after the publication of this UK regulatory guidance. In total, 69 live-odds adverts were shown over 32 matches (M = 2.16 per-match), by five bookmakers. We identified two key features that made advertised bets appear more urgent than necessary. First, 39.1% of bets could be determined before the match ended. Second, 24.6% of bets showed a recent improvement in odds, including a 15.9% subset of “flash odds,” which were limited in both time and quantity. Advertised odds were again skewed toward complex events, with a qualitative trend toward greater complexity than at the previous World Cup. We believe that consumers should be protected against the targeted content of gambling advertising.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6557471
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65574712019-06-17 Live-odds gambling advertising and consumer protection Newall, Philip W. S. Thobhani, Ankush Walasek, Lukasz Meyer, Caroline PLoS One Research Article In-play gambling is a recent innovation allowing gambling to occur during the course of a sporting event, rather than merely before play commences. For years, in-play gambling has been marketed in the UK via adverts displaying current betting odds during breaks in televised soccer, e.g., “England to score in the first 20 minutes, 4-to-1.” Previous research shows that this so-called “live-odds” advertising is skewed toward complex events with high profit margins which consumers do not evaluate rationally. Recent UK regulatory guidance on “impulsiveness and urgency,” aiming to enhance consumer protection around gambling advertising, states that gambling advertising should not “unduly pressure the audience to gamble.” We explored the frequency and content of live-odds advertising over the 2018 soccer World Cup, as a case study of the first major televised sporting event after the publication of this UK regulatory guidance. In total, 69 live-odds adverts were shown over 32 matches (M = 2.16 per-match), by five bookmakers. We identified two key features that made advertised bets appear more urgent than necessary. First, 39.1% of bets could be determined before the match ended. Second, 24.6% of bets showed a recent improvement in odds, including a 15.9% subset of “flash odds,” which were limited in both time and quantity. Advertised odds were again skewed toward complex events, with a qualitative trend toward greater complexity than at the previous World Cup. We believe that consumers should be protected against the targeted content of gambling advertising. Public Library of Science 2019-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6557471/ /pubmed/31181084 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216876 Text en © 2019 Newall et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Newall, Philip W. S.
Thobhani, Ankush
Walasek, Lukasz
Meyer, Caroline
Live-odds gambling advertising and consumer protection
title Live-odds gambling advertising and consumer protection
title_full Live-odds gambling advertising and consumer protection
title_fullStr Live-odds gambling advertising and consumer protection
title_full_unstemmed Live-odds gambling advertising and consumer protection
title_short Live-odds gambling advertising and consumer protection
title_sort live-odds gambling advertising and consumer protection
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6557471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31181084
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216876
work_keys_str_mv AT newallphilipws liveoddsgamblingadvertisingandconsumerprotection
AT thobhaniankush liveoddsgamblingadvertisingandconsumerprotection
AT walaseklukasz liveoddsgamblingadvertisingandconsumerprotection
AT meyercaroline liveoddsgamblingadvertisingandconsumerprotection