Cargando…

Comparison of antibody titres between intradermal and intramuscular rabies vaccination using inactivated vaccine in cattle in Bhutan

In developing countries, the cost of vaccination limits the use of prophylactic rabies vaccination, especially in cattle. Intradermal vaccination delivers antigen directly to an area with higher number of antigen-presenting cells. Therefore, it could produce equivalent or higher antibody titres than...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wangmo, Karma, Laven, Richard, Cliquet, Florence, Wasniewski, Marine, Yang, Aaron
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6557474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31181078
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209946
_version_ 1783425453595295744
author Wangmo, Karma
Laven, Richard
Cliquet, Florence
Wasniewski, Marine
Yang, Aaron
author_facet Wangmo, Karma
Laven, Richard
Cliquet, Florence
Wasniewski, Marine
Yang, Aaron
author_sort Wangmo, Karma
collection PubMed
description In developing countries, the cost of vaccination limits the use of prophylactic rabies vaccination, especially in cattle. Intradermal vaccination delivers antigen directly to an area with higher number of antigen-presenting cells. Therefore, it could produce equivalent or higher antibody titres than conventional intramuscular vaccination even when a lower dose is given. This study aimed to compare the antibody response in cattle vaccinated intramuscularly with 1mL of inactivated rabies vaccine (Raksharab, Indian Immunologicals) against intradermally vaccinated cattle with 0.2mL of the same vaccine. The study was conducted in Haa province of Bhutan where rabies is not endemic. One hundred cattle from 27 farms were selected for the study. Virus neutralising antibody (VNA) response was measured using the fluorescent antibody virus neutralisation test on the day of vaccination (day 0) and 14, 30, 60 and 90 days later. Overall, 71% of intradermally vaccinated cattle and 89% of the intramuscularly vaccinated cattle produced an adequate response (≥0.5IU/mL). On days 14 and 30 post vaccination fewer cattle (P<0.02) in the intradermal group had adequate titres with 36% and 58%, respectively, having titres ≥0.5 IU/mL compared to the equivalent figures of 78% and 77% in the intramuscular group. The mean VNA titres were lower for the intradermal group than intramuscular group (p<0.001) with the mean difference being > 0.6 IU/mL. Although low dose intradermal vaccination did produce a detectable antibody response, it was inferior to intramuscular vaccination. Thus, although intradermal vaccination has the potential to reduce the cost of vaccination by reducing the dose required, this study showed that a single dose of 0.2 mL intradermally was inferior to an intramuscular dose of 1 mL. Further research evaluating dose and dose regimen is needed before intradermal vaccination using the Raksharab rabies vaccine can be recommended in cattle.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6557474
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65574742019-06-17 Comparison of antibody titres between intradermal and intramuscular rabies vaccination using inactivated vaccine in cattle in Bhutan Wangmo, Karma Laven, Richard Cliquet, Florence Wasniewski, Marine Yang, Aaron PLoS One Research Article In developing countries, the cost of vaccination limits the use of prophylactic rabies vaccination, especially in cattle. Intradermal vaccination delivers antigen directly to an area with higher number of antigen-presenting cells. Therefore, it could produce equivalent or higher antibody titres than conventional intramuscular vaccination even when a lower dose is given. This study aimed to compare the antibody response in cattle vaccinated intramuscularly with 1mL of inactivated rabies vaccine (Raksharab, Indian Immunologicals) against intradermally vaccinated cattle with 0.2mL of the same vaccine. The study was conducted in Haa province of Bhutan where rabies is not endemic. One hundred cattle from 27 farms were selected for the study. Virus neutralising antibody (VNA) response was measured using the fluorescent antibody virus neutralisation test on the day of vaccination (day 0) and 14, 30, 60 and 90 days later. Overall, 71% of intradermally vaccinated cattle and 89% of the intramuscularly vaccinated cattle produced an adequate response (≥0.5IU/mL). On days 14 and 30 post vaccination fewer cattle (P<0.02) in the intradermal group had adequate titres with 36% and 58%, respectively, having titres ≥0.5 IU/mL compared to the equivalent figures of 78% and 77% in the intramuscular group. The mean VNA titres were lower for the intradermal group than intramuscular group (p<0.001) with the mean difference being > 0.6 IU/mL. Although low dose intradermal vaccination did produce a detectable antibody response, it was inferior to intramuscular vaccination. Thus, although intradermal vaccination has the potential to reduce the cost of vaccination by reducing the dose required, this study showed that a single dose of 0.2 mL intradermally was inferior to an intramuscular dose of 1 mL. Further research evaluating dose and dose regimen is needed before intradermal vaccination using the Raksharab rabies vaccine can be recommended in cattle. Public Library of Science 2019-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6557474/ /pubmed/31181078 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209946 Text en © 2019 Wangmo et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wangmo, Karma
Laven, Richard
Cliquet, Florence
Wasniewski, Marine
Yang, Aaron
Comparison of antibody titres between intradermal and intramuscular rabies vaccination using inactivated vaccine in cattle in Bhutan
title Comparison of antibody titres between intradermal and intramuscular rabies vaccination using inactivated vaccine in cattle in Bhutan
title_full Comparison of antibody titres between intradermal and intramuscular rabies vaccination using inactivated vaccine in cattle in Bhutan
title_fullStr Comparison of antibody titres between intradermal and intramuscular rabies vaccination using inactivated vaccine in cattle in Bhutan
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of antibody titres between intradermal and intramuscular rabies vaccination using inactivated vaccine in cattle in Bhutan
title_short Comparison of antibody titres between intradermal and intramuscular rabies vaccination using inactivated vaccine in cattle in Bhutan
title_sort comparison of antibody titres between intradermal and intramuscular rabies vaccination using inactivated vaccine in cattle in bhutan
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6557474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31181078
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209946
work_keys_str_mv AT wangmokarma comparisonofantibodytitresbetweenintradermalandintramuscularrabiesvaccinationusinginactivatedvaccineincattleinbhutan
AT lavenrichard comparisonofantibodytitresbetweenintradermalandintramuscularrabiesvaccinationusinginactivatedvaccineincattleinbhutan
AT cliquetflorence comparisonofantibodytitresbetweenintradermalandintramuscularrabiesvaccinationusinginactivatedvaccineincattleinbhutan
AT wasniewskimarine comparisonofantibodytitresbetweenintradermalandintramuscularrabiesvaccinationusinginactivatedvaccineincattleinbhutan
AT yangaaron comparisonofantibodytitresbetweenintradermalandintramuscularrabiesvaccinationusinginactivatedvaccineincattleinbhutan