Cargando…
An observational, prospective, multicenter study on rescue high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in neonates failing with conventional ventilation
BACKGROUND: To achieve gas exchange goals and mitigate lung injury, infants who fail with conventional ventilation (CV) are generally switched to high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV). Although preferred in many neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), research on this type of rescue HFOV has...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6557483/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31181092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217768 |
_version_ | 1783425455716564992 |
---|---|
author | Erdeve, Omer Okulu, Emel Tunc, Gaffari Celik, Yalcın Kayacan, Ugur Cetinkaya, Merih Buyukkale, Gokhan Ozkan, Hilal Koksal, Nilgun Satar, Mehmet Akcali, Mustafa Aygun, Canan Ozkiraz, Servet Zubarioglu, Umut Unal, Sezin Turgut, Hatice Mert, Kurthan Gokmen, Tulin Akcan, Barıs Atasay, Begum Arsan, Saadet |
author_facet | Erdeve, Omer Okulu, Emel Tunc, Gaffari Celik, Yalcın Kayacan, Ugur Cetinkaya, Merih Buyukkale, Gokhan Ozkan, Hilal Koksal, Nilgun Satar, Mehmet Akcali, Mustafa Aygun, Canan Ozkiraz, Servet Zubarioglu, Umut Unal, Sezin Turgut, Hatice Mert, Kurthan Gokmen, Tulin Akcan, Barıs Atasay, Begum Arsan, Saadet |
author_sort | Erdeve, Omer |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To achieve gas exchange goals and mitigate lung injury, infants who fail with conventional ventilation (CV) are generally switched to high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV). Although preferred in many neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), research on this type of rescue HFOV has not been reported recently. METHODS: An online registry database for a multicenter, prospective study was set to evaluate factors affecting the response of newborn infants to rescue HFOV treatment. The study population consisted of 372 infants with CV failure after at least 4 hours of treatment in 23 participating NICUs. Patients were grouped according to their final outcome as survived (Group S) or as died or received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) (Group D/E). Patients’ demographic characteristics and underlying diseases in addition to their ventilator settings, arterial blood gas (ABG) analysis results at 0, 1, 4, and 24 hours, type of device, ventilation duration, and complications were compared between groups. RESULTS: HFOV as rescue treatment was successful in 58.1% of patients. Demographic and treatment parameters were not different between groups, except that infants in Group D/E had lower birthweight (BW) (1655 ± 1091 vs. 1858 ± 1027 g, p = 0.006), a higher initial FiO(2) setting (83% vs. 72%, p < 0.001), and a higher rate of nitric oxide exposure (21.8% vs. 11.1%, p = 0.004) in comparison to infants who survived (Group S). The initial cut-offs for a successful response on ABG were defined as pH >7.065 (OR: 19.74, 95% CI 4.83–80.6, p < 0.001), HCO(3) >16.35 mmol/L (OR: 1.06, 95% CI 1.01–1.1, p = 0.006), and lactate level <3.75 mmol/L (OR: 1.09%95 CI 1.01–1.16, p = 0.006). Rescue HFOV duration was associated with retinopathy of prematurity (p = 0.005) and moderate or severe chronic lung disease (p < 0.001), but not with patent ductus arteriosus or intraventricular hemorrhage, in survivors (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Rescue HFOV as defined for this population was successful in more than half of the patients with CV failure. Although the response was not associated with gestational age, underlying disease, device used, or initial MV settings, it seemed to be more effective in patients with higher BW and those not requiring nitric oxide. Initial pH, HCO(3), and lactate levels on ABG may be used as predictors of a response to rescue HFOV. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6557483 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65574832019-06-17 An observational, prospective, multicenter study on rescue high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in neonates failing with conventional ventilation Erdeve, Omer Okulu, Emel Tunc, Gaffari Celik, Yalcın Kayacan, Ugur Cetinkaya, Merih Buyukkale, Gokhan Ozkan, Hilal Koksal, Nilgun Satar, Mehmet Akcali, Mustafa Aygun, Canan Ozkiraz, Servet Zubarioglu, Umut Unal, Sezin Turgut, Hatice Mert, Kurthan Gokmen, Tulin Akcan, Barıs Atasay, Begum Arsan, Saadet PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: To achieve gas exchange goals and mitigate lung injury, infants who fail with conventional ventilation (CV) are generally switched to high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV). Although preferred in many neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), research on this type of rescue HFOV has not been reported recently. METHODS: An online registry database for a multicenter, prospective study was set to evaluate factors affecting the response of newborn infants to rescue HFOV treatment. The study population consisted of 372 infants with CV failure after at least 4 hours of treatment in 23 participating NICUs. Patients were grouped according to their final outcome as survived (Group S) or as died or received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) (Group D/E). Patients’ demographic characteristics and underlying diseases in addition to their ventilator settings, arterial blood gas (ABG) analysis results at 0, 1, 4, and 24 hours, type of device, ventilation duration, and complications were compared between groups. RESULTS: HFOV as rescue treatment was successful in 58.1% of patients. Demographic and treatment parameters were not different between groups, except that infants in Group D/E had lower birthweight (BW) (1655 ± 1091 vs. 1858 ± 1027 g, p = 0.006), a higher initial FiO(2) setting (83% vs. 72%, p < 0.001), and a higher rate of nitric oxide exposure (21.8% vs. 11.1%, p = 0.004) in comparison to infants who survived (Group S). The initial cut-offs for a successful response on ABG were defined as pH >7.065 (OR: 19.74, 95% CI 4.83–80.6, p < 0.001), HCO(3) >16.35 mmol/L (OR: 1.06, 95% CI 1.01–1.1, p = 0.006), and lactate level <3.75 mmol/L (OR: 1.09%95 CI 1.01–1.16, p = 0.006). Rescue HFOV duration was associated with retinopathy of prematurity (p = 0.005) and moderate or severe chronic lung disease (p < 0.001), but not with patent ductus arteriosus or intraventricular hemorrhage, in survivors (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Rescue HFOV as defined for this population was successful in more than half of the patients with CV failure. Although the response was not associated with gestational age, underlying disease, device used, or initial MV settings, it seemed to be more effective in patients with higher BW and those not requiring nitric oxide. Initial pH, HCO(3), and lactate levels on ABG may be used as predictors of a response to rescue HFOV. Public Library of Science 2019-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6557483/ /pubmed/31181092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217768 Text en © 2019 Erdeve et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Erdeve, Omer Okulu, Emel Tunc, Gaffari Celik, Yalcın Kayacan, Ugur Cetinkaya, Merih Buyukkale, Gokhan Ozkan, Hilal Koksal, Nilgun Satar, Mehmet Akcali, Mustafa Aygun, Canan Ozkiraz, Servet Zubarioglu, Umut Unal, Sezin Turgut, Hatice Mert, Kurthan Gokmen, Tulin Akcan, Barıs Atasay, Begum Arsan, Saadet An observational, prospective, multicenter study on rescue high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in neonates failing with conventional ventilation |
title | An observational, prospective, multicenter study on rescue high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in neonates failing with conventional ventilation |
title_full | An observational, prospective, multicenter study on rescue high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in neonates failing with conventional ventilation |
title_fullStr | An observational, prospective, multicenter study on rescue high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in neonates failing with conventional ventilation |
title_full_unstemmed | An observational, prospective, multicenter study on rescue high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in neonates failing with conventional ventilation |
title_short | An observational, prospective, multicenter study on rescue high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in neonates failing with conventional ventilation |
title_sort | observational, prospective, multicenter study on rescue high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in neonates failing with conventional ventilation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6557483/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31181092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217768 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT erdeveomer anobservationalprospectivemulticenterstudyonrescuehighfrequencyoscillatoryventilationinneonatesfailingwithconventionalventilation AT okuluemel anobservationalprospectivemulticenterstudyonrescuehighfrequencyoscillatoryventilationinneonatesfailingwithconventionalventilation AT tuncgaffari anobservationalprospectivemulticenterstudyonrescuehighfrequencyoscillatoryventilationinneonatesfailingwithconventionalventilation AT celikyalcın anobservationalprospectivemulticenterstudyonrescuehighfrequencyoscillatoryventilationinneonatesfailingwithconventionalventilation AT kayacanugur anobservationalprospectivemulticenterstudyonrescuehighfrequencyoscillatoryventilationinneonatesfailingwithconventionalventilation AT cetinkayamerih anobservationalprospectivemulticenterstudyonrescuehighfrequencyoscillatoryventilationinneonatesfailingwithconventionalventilation AT buyukkalegokhan anobservationalprospectivemulticenterstudyonrescuehighfrequencyoscillatoryventilationinneonatesfailingwithconventionalventilation AT ozkanhilal anobservationalprospectivemulticenterstudyonrescuehighfrequencyoscillatoryventilationinneonatesfailingwithconventionalventilation AT koksalnilgun anobservationalprospectivemulticenterstudyonrescuehighfrequencyoscillatoryventilationinneonatesfailingwithconventionalventilation AT satarmehmet anobservationalprospectivemulticenterstudyonrescuehighfrequencyoscillatoryventilationinneonatesfailingwithconventionalventilation AT akcalimustafa anobservationalprospectivemulticenterstudyonrescuehighfrequencyoscillatoryventilationinneonatesfailingwithconventionalventilation AT ayguncanan anobservationalprospectivemulticenterstudyonrescuehighfrequencyoscillatoryventilationinneonatesfailingwithconventionalventilation AT ozkirazservet anobservationalprospectivemulticenterstudyonrescuehighfrequencyoscillatoryventilationinneonatesfailingwithconventionalventilation AT zubariogluumut anobservationalprospectivemulticenterstudyonrescuehighfrequencyoscillatoryventilationinneonatesfailingwithconventionalventilation AT unalsezin anobservationalprospectivemulticenterstudyonrescuehighfrequencyoscillatoryventilationinneonatesfailingwithconventionalventilation AT turguthatice anobservationalprospectivemulticenterstudyonrescuehighfrequencyoscillatoryventilationinneonatesfailingwithconventionalventilation AT mertkurthan anobservationalprospectivemulticenterstudyonrescuehighfrequencyoscillatoryventilationinneonatesfailingwithconventionalventilation AT gokmentulin anobservationalprospectivemulticenterstudyonrescuehighfrequencyoscillatoryventilationinneonatesfailingwithconventionalventilation AT akcanbarıs anobservationalprospectivemulticenterstudyonrescuehighfrequencyoscillatoryventilationinneonatesfailingwithconventionalventilation AT atasaybegum anobservationalprospectivemulticenterstudyonrescuehighfrequencyoscillatoryventilationinneonatesfailingwithconventionalventilation AT arsansaadet anobservationalprospectivemulticenterstudyonrescuehighfrequencyoscillatoryventilationinneonatesfailingwithconventionalventilation AT anobservationalprospectivemulticenterstudyonrescuehighfrequencyoscillatoryventilationinneonatesfailingwithconventionalventilation AT erdeveomer observationalprospectivemulticenterstudyonrescuehighfrequencyoscillatoryventilationinneonatesfailingwithconventionalventilation AT okuluemel observationalprospectivemulticenterstudyonrescuehighfrequencyoscillatoryventilationinneonatesfailingwithconventionalventilation AT tuncgaffari observationalprospectivemulticenterstudyonrescuehighfrequencyoscillatoryventilationinneonatesfailingwithconventionalventilation AT celikyalcın observationalprospectivemulticenterstudyonrescuehighfrequencyoscillatoryventilationinneonatesfailingwithconventionalventilation AT kayacanugur observationalprospectivemulticenterstudyonrescuehighfrequencyoscillatoryventilationinneonatesfailingwithconventionalventilation AT cetinkayamerih observationalprospectivemulticenterstudyonrescuehighfrequencyoscillatoryventilationinneonatesfailingwithconventionalventilation AT buyukkalegokhan observationalprospectivemulticenterstudyonrescuehighfrequencyoscillatoryventilationinneonatesfailingwithconventionalventilation AT ozkanhilal observationalprospectivemulticenterstudyonrescuehighfrequencyoscillatoryventilationinneonatesfailingwithconventionalventilation AT koksalnilgun observationalprospectivemulticenterstudyonrescuehighfrequencyoscillatoryventilationinneonatesfailingwithconventionalventilation AT satarmehmet observationalprospectivemulticenterstudyonrescuehighfrequencyoscillatoryventilationinneonatesfailingwithconventionalventilation AT akcalimustafa observationalprospectivemulticenterstudyonrescuehighfrequencyoscillatoryventilationinneonatesfailingwithconventionalventilation AT ayguncanan observationalprospectivemulticenterstudyonrescuehighfrequencyoscillatoryventilationinneonatesfailingwithconventionalventilation AT ozkirazservet observationalprospectivemulticenterstudyonrescuehighfrequencyoscillatoryventilationinneonatesfailingwithconventionalventilation AT zubariogluumut observationalprospectivemulticenterstudyonrescuehighfrequencyoscillatoryventilationinneonatesfailingwithconventionalventilation AT unalsezin observationalprospectivemulticenterstudyonrescuehighfrequencyoscillatoryventilationinneonatesfailingwithconventionalventilation AT turguthatice observationalprospectivemulticenterstudyonrescuehighfrequencyoscillatoryventilationinneonatesfailingwithconventionalventilation AT mertkurthan observationalprospectivemulticenterstudyonrescuehighfrequencyoscillatoryventilationinneonatesfailingwithconventionalventilation AT gokmentulin observationalprospectivemulticenterstudyonrescuehighfrequencyoscillatoryventilationinneonatesfailingwithconventionalventilation AT akcanbarıs observationalprospectivemulticenterstudyonrescuehighfrequencyoscillatoryventilationinneonatesfailingwithconventionalventilation AT atasaybegum observationalprospectivemulticenterstudyonrescuehighfrequencyoscillatoryventilationinneonatesfailingwithconventionalventilation AT arsansaadet observationalprospectivemulticenterstudyonrescuehighfrequencyoscillatoryventilationinneonatesfailingwithconventionalventilation AT observationalprospectivemulticenterstudyonrescuehighfrequencyoscillatoryventilationinneonatesfailingwithconventionalventilation |