Cargando…
Forecasting national and regional influenza-like illness for the USA
Health planners use forecasts of key metrics associated with influenza-like illness (ILI); near-term weekly incidence, week of season onset, week of peak, and intensity of peak. Here, we describe our participation in a weekly prospective ILI forecasting challenge for the United States for the 2016-1...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6557527/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31120881 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007013 |
_version_ | 1783425466137313280 |
---|---|
author | Ben-Nun, Michal Riley, Pete Turtle, James Bacon, David P. Riley, Steven |
author_facet | Ben-Nun, Michal Riley, Pete Turtle, James Bacon, David P. Riley, Steven |
author_sort | Ben-Nun, Michal |
collection | PubMed |
description | Health planners use forecasts of key metrics associated with influenza-like illness (ILI); near-term weekly incidence, week of season onset, week of peak, and intensity of peak. Here, we describe our participation in a weekly prospective ILI forecasting challenge for the United States for the 2016-17 season and subsequent evaluation of our performance. We implemented a metapopulation model framework with 32 model variants. Variants differed from each other in their assumptions about: the force-of-infection (FOI); use of uninformative priors; the use of discounted historical data for not-yet-observed time points; and the treatment of regions as either independent or coupled. Individual model variants were chosen subjectively as the basis for our weekly forecasts; however, a subset of coupled models were only available part way through the season. Most frequently, during the 2016-17 season, we chose; FOI variants with both school vacations and humidity terms; uninformative priors; the inclusion of discounted historical data for not-yet-observed time points; and coupled regions (when available). Our near-term weekly forecasts substantially over-estimated incidence early in the season when coupled models were not available. However, our forecast accuracy improved in absolute terms and relative to other teams once coupled solutions were available. In retrospective analysis, we found that the 2016-17 season was not typical: on average, coupled models performed better when fit without historically augmented data. Also, we tested a simple ensemble model for the 2016-17 season and found that it underperformed our subjective choice for all forecast targets. In this study, we were able to improve accuracy during a prospective forecasting exercise by coupling dynamics between regions. Although reduction of forecast subjectivity should be a long-term goal, some degree of human intervention is likely to improve forecast accuracy in the medium-term in parallel with the systematic consideration of more sophisticated ensemble approaches. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6557527 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65575272019-06-17 Forecasting national and regional influenza-like illness for the USA Ben-Nun, Michal Riley, Pete Turtle, James Bacon, David P. Riley, Steven PLoS Comput Biol Research Article Health planners use forecasts of key metrics associated with influenza-like illness (ILI); near-term weekly incidence, week of season onset, week of peak, and intensity of peak. Here, we describe our participation in a weekly prospective ILI forecasting challenge for the United States for the 2016-17 season and subsequent evaluation of our performance. We implemented a metapopulation model framework with 32 model variants. Variants differed from each other in their assumptions about: the force-of-infection (FOI); use of uninformative priors; the use of discounted historical data for not-yet-observed time points; and the treatment of regions as either independent or coupled. Individual model variants were chosen subjectively as the basis for our weekly forecasts; however, a subset of coupled models were only available part way through the season. Most frequently, during the 2016-17 season, we chose; FOI variants with both school vacations and humidity terms; uninformative priors; the inclusion of discounted historical data for not-yet-observed time points; and coupled regions (when available). Our near-term weekly forecasts substantially over-estimated incidence early in the season when coupled models were not available. However, our forecast accuracy improved in absolute terms and relative to other teams once coupled solutions were available. In retrospective analysis, we found that the 2016-17 season was not typical: on average, coupled models performed better when fit without historically augmented data. Also, we tested a simple ensemble model for the 2016-17 season and found that it underperformed our subjective choice for all forecast targets. In this study, we were able to improve accuracy during a prospective forecasting exercise by coupling dynamics between regions. Although reduction of forecast subjectivity should be a long-term goal, some degree of human intervention is likely to improve forecast accuracy in the medium-term in parallel with the systematic consideration of more sophisticated ensemble approaches. Public Library of Science 2019-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6557527/ /pubmed/31120881 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007013 Text en © 2019 Ben-Nun et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ben-Nun, Michal Riley, Pete Turtle, James Bacon, David P. Riley, Steven Forecasting national and regional influenza-like illness for the USA |
title | Forecasting national and regional influenza-like illness for the USA |
title_full | Forecasting national and regional influenza-like illness for the USA |
title_fullStr | Forecasting national and regional influenza-like illness for the USA |
title_full_unstemmed | Forecasting national and regional influenza-like illness for the USA |
title_short | Forecasting national and regional influenza-like illness for the USA |
title_sort | forecasting national and regional influenza-like illness for the usa |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6557527/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31120881 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007013 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bennunmichal forecastingnationalandregionalinfluenzalikeillnessfortheusa AT rileypete forecastingnationalandregionalinfluenzalikeillnessfortheusa AT turtlejames forecastingnationalandregionalinfluenzalikeillnessfortheusa AT bacondavidp forecastingnationalandregionalinfluenzalikeillnessfortheusa AT rileysteven forecastingnationalandregionalinfluenzalikeillnessfortheusa |