Cargando…

Functional Comparison of Blood-Stage Plasmodium falciparum Malaria Vaccine Candidate Antigens

The malaria genome encodes over 5,000 proteins and many of these have also been proposed to be potential vaccine candidates, although few of these have been tested clinically. RH5 is one of the leading blood-stage Plasmodium falciparum malaria vaccine antigens and Phase I/II clinical trials of vacci...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Illingworth, Joseph J., Alanine, Daniel G., Brown, Rebecca, Marshall, Jennifer M., Bartlett, Helen E., Silk, Sarah E., Labbé, Geneviève M., Quinkert, Doris, Cho, Jee Sun, Wendler, Jason P., Pattinson, David J., Barfod, Lea, Douglas, Alexander D., Shea, Michael W., Wright, Katherine E., de Cassan, Simone C., Higgins, Matthew K., Draper, Simon J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6558156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31214195
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.01254
_version_ 1783425569910685696
author Illingworth, Joseph J.
Alanine, Daniel G.
Brown, Rebecca
Marshall, Jennifer M.
Bartlett, Helen E.
Silk, Sarah E.
Labbé, Geneviève M.
Quinkert, Doris
Cho, Jee Sun
Wendler, Jason P.
Pattinson, David J.
Barfod, Lea
Douglas, Alexander D.
Shea, Michael W.
Wright, Katherine E.
de Cassan, Simone C.
Higgins, Matthew K.
Draper, Simon J.
author_facet Illingworth, Joseph J.
Alanine, Daniel G.
Brown, Rebecca
Marshall, Jennifer M.
Bartlett, Helen E.
Silk, Sarah E.
Labbé, Geneviève M.
Quinkert, Doris
Cho, Jee Sun
Wendler, Jason P.
Pattinson, David J.
Barfod, Lea
Douglas, Alexander D.
Shea, Michael W.
Wright, Katherine E.
de Cassan, Simone C.
Higgins, Matthew K.
Draper, Simon J.
author_sort Illingworth, Joseph J.
collection PubMed
description The malaria genome encodes over 5,000 proteins and many of these have also been proposed to be potential vaccine candidates, although few of these have been tested clinically. RH5 is one of the leading blood-stage Plasmodium falciparum malaria vaccine antigens and Phase I/II clinical trials of vaccines containing this antigen are currently underway. Its likely mechanism of action is to elicit antibodies that can neutralize merozoites by blocking their invasion of red blood cells (RBC). However, many other antigens could also elicit neutralizing antibodies against the merozoite, and most of these have never been compared directly to RH5. The objective of this study was to compare a range of blood-stage antigens to RH5, to identify any antigens that outperform or synergize with anti-RH5 antibodies. We selected 55 gene products, covering 15 candidate antigens that have been described in the literature and 40 genes selected on the basis of bioinformatics functional prediction. We were able to make 20 protein-in-adjuvant vaccines from the original selection. Of these, S-antigen and CyRPA robustly elicited antibodies with neutralizing properties. Anti-CyRPA IgG generally showed additive GIA with anti-RH5 IgG, although high levels of anti-CyRPA-specific rabbit polyclonal IgG were required to achieve 50% GIA. Our data suggest that further vaccine antigen screening efforts are required to identify a second merozoite target with similar antibody-susceptibility to RH5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6558156
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65581562019-06-18 Functional Comparison of Blood-Stage Plasmodium falciparum Malaria Vaccine Candidate Antigens Illingworth, Joseph J. Alanine, Daniel G. Brown, Rebecca Marshall, Jennifer M. Bartlett, Helen E. Silk, Sarah E. Labbé, Geneviève M. Quinkert, Doris Cho, Jee Sun Wendler, Jason P. Pattinson, David J. Barfod, Lea Douglas, Alexander D. Shea, Michael W. Wright, Katherine E. de Cassan, Simone C. Higgins, Matthew K. Draper, Simon J. Front Immunol Immunology The malaria genome encodes over 5,000 proteins and many of these have also been proposed to be potential vaccine candidates, although few of these have been tested clinically. RH5 is one of the leading blood-stage Plasmodium falciparum malaria vaccine antigens and Phase I/II clinical trials of vaccines containing this antigen are currently underway. Its likely mechanism of action is to elicit antibodies that can neutralize merozoites by blocking their invasion of red blood cells (RBC). However, many other antigens could also elicit neutralizing antibodies against the merozoite, and most of these have never been compared directly to RH5. The objective of this study was to compare a range of blood-stage antigens to RH5, to identify any antigens that outperform or synergize with anti-RH5 antibodies. We selected 55 gene products, covering 15 candidate antigens that have been described in the literature and 40 genes selected on the basis of bioinformatics functional prediction. We were able to make 20 protein-in-adjuvant vaccines from the original selection. Of these, S-antigen and CyRPA robustly elicited antibodies with neutralizing properties. Anti-CyRPA IgG generally showed additive GIA with anti-RH5 IgG, although high levels of anti-CyRPA-specific rabbit polyclonal IgG were required to achieve 50% GIA. Our data suggest that further vaccine antigen screening efforts are required to identify a second merozoite target with similar antibody-susceptibility to RH5. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6558156/ /pubmed/31214195 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.01254 Text en Copyright © 2019 Illingworth, Alanine, Brown, Marshall, Bartlett, Silk, Labbé, Quinkert, Cho, Wendler, Pattinson, Barfod, Douglas, Shea, Wright, de Cassan, Higgins and Draper. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Immunology
Illingworth, Joseph J.
Alanine, Daniel G.
Brown, Rebecca
Marshall, Jennifer M.
Bartlett, Helen E.
Silk, Sarah E.
Labbé, Geneviève M.
Quinkert, Doris
Cho, Jee Sun
Wendler, Jason P.
Pattinson, David J.
Barfod, Lea
Douglas, Alexander D.
Shea, Michael W.
Wright, Katherine E.
de Cassan, Simone C.
Higgins, Matthew K.
Draper, Simon J.
Functional Comparison of Blood-Stage Plasmodium falciparum Malaria Vaccine Candidate Antigens
title Functional Comparison of Blood-Stage Plasmodium falciparum Malaria Vaccine Candidate Antigens
title_full Functional Comparison of Blood-Stage Plasmodium falciparum Malaria Vaccine Candidate Antigens
title_fullStr Functional Comparison of Blood-Stage Plasmodium falciparum Malaria Vaccine Candidate Antigens
title_full_unstemmed Functional Comparison of Blood-Stage Plasmodium falciparum Malaria Vaccine Candidate Antigens
title_short Functional Comparison of Blood-Stage Plasmodium falciparum Malaria Vaccine Candidate Antigens
title_sort functional comparison of blood-stage plasmodium falciparum malaria vaccine candidate antigens
topic Immunology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6558156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31214195
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.01254
work_keys_str_mv AT illingworthjosephj functionalcomparisonofbloodstageplasmodiumfalciparummalariavaccinecandidateantigens
AT alaninedanielg functionalcomparisonofbloodstageplasmodiumfalciparummalariavaccinecandidateantigens
AT brownrebecca functionalcomparisonofbloodstageplasmodiumfalciparummalariavaccinecandidateantigens
AT marshalljenniferm functionalcomparisonofbloodstageplasmodiumfalciparummalariavaccinecandidateantigens
AT bartletthelene functionalcomparisonofbloodstageplasmodiumfalciparummalariavaccinecandidateantigens
AT silksarahe functionalcomparisonofbloodstageplasmodiumfalciparummalariavaccinecandidateantigens
AT labbegenevievem functionalcomparisonofbloodstageplasmodiumfalciparummalariavaccinecandidateantigens
AT quinkertdoris functionalcomparisonofbloodstageplasmodiumfalciparummalariavaccinecandidateantigens
AT chojeesun functionalcomparisonofbloodstageplasmodiumfalciparummalariavaccinecandidateantigens
AT wendlerjasonp functionalcomparisonofbloodstageplasmodiumfalciparummalariavaccinecandidateantigens
AT pattinsondavidj functionalcomparisonofbloodstageplasmodiumfalciparummalariavaccinecandidateantigens
AT barfodlea functionalcomparisonofbloodstageplasmodiumfalciparummalariavaccinecandidateantigens
AT douglasalexanderd functionalcomparisonofbloodstageplasmodiumfalciparummalariavaccinecandidateantigens
AT sheamichaelw functionalcomparisonofbloodstageplasmodiumfalciparummalariavaccinecandidateantigens
AT wrightkatherinee functionalcomparisonofbloodstageplasmodiumfalciparummalariavaccinecandidateantigens
AT decassansimonec functionalcomparisonofbloodstageplasmodiumfalciparummalariavaccinecandidateantigens
AT higginsmatthewk functionalcomparisonofbloodstageplasmodiumfalciparummalariavaccinecandidateantigens
AT drapersimonj functionalcomparisonofbloodstageplasmodiumfalciparummalariavaccinecandidateantigens