Cargando…

Novel risk scoring system for prediction of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND: The available prediction models for clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) do not incorporate both preoperative and intraoperative variables. AIM: To construct a new risk scoring system for CR-POPF that includes both preoperative and intraoperative factors. METHOD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Ye, Zhou, Fang, Zhu, Dong-Ming, Zhang, Zi-Xiang, Yang, Jian, Yao, Jun, Wei, Yi-Jun, Xu, Ya-Ling, Li, Dei-Chun, Zhou, Jian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6558436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31210716
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i21.2650
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The available prediction models for clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) do not incorporate both preoperative and intraoperative variables. AIM: To construct a new risk scoring system for CR-POPF that includes both preoperative and intraoperative factors. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) or pylorus-preserving PD (PPPD) between January 2011 and December 2016 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University. Patients were divided into a study (01/2011 to 12/2014) or validation (01/2015 to 12/2016) group according to the time of admission. POPF severity was classified into three grades: Biochemical leak (grade A) and CR-POPF (grades B and C). Logistic regression was used to create a predictive scoring system. RESULTS: Preoperative serum albumin ≥ 35 g/L [P = 0.032, odds ratio (OR) = 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.85-0.99], hard pancreatic texture (P = 0.004, OR = 0.25, 95%CI: 0.10-0.64), pancreatic duct diameter ≥ 3 mm (P = 0.029, OR = 0.50, 95%CI: 0.27-0.93), and intraoperative blood loss ≥ 500 mL (P = 0.006, OR = 1.002, 95%CI: 1.001-1.003) were independently associated with CR-POPF. We established a 10-point risk scoring system to predict CR-POPF. The area under the curve was 0.821 (95%CI: 0.736-0.905) and the cut-off value was 3.5. Including drain amylase levels improved the predictive power of the model. CONCLUSION: This study established a 10-point scoring system to predict CR-POPF after PD/PPPD using preoperative and intraoperative parameters. Ultimately, this system could be used to distinguish between high- and low-risk populations in order to facilitate timely interventions after PD.