Cargando…
Preemptive one lung ventilation enhances lung collapse during thoracoscopic surgery: A randomized controlled trial
In routine practice, one lung ventilation (OLV) is initiated upon pleural opening. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to compare lung collapse after preemptive OLV versus conventional OLV in thoracoscopic surgery. A total of 67 patients were enrolled (34 with conventional OLV; 33 with preemp...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6558447/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31115153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13091 |
_version_ | 1783425626727776256 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Yunxiao Yan, Wanpu Fan, Zhiyi Kang, Xiaozheng Tan, Hongyu Fu, Hao Li, Zhendong Chen, Ke‐Neng Chen, Jiheng |
author_facet | Zhang, Yunxiao Yan, Wanpu Fan, Zhiyi Kang, Xiaozheng Tan, Hongyu Fu, Hao Li, Zhendong Chen, Ke‐Neng Chen, Jiheng |
author_sort | Zhang, Yunxiao |
collection | PubMed |
description | In routine practice, one lung ventilation (OLV) is initiated upon pleural opening. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to compare lung collapse after preemptive OLV versus conventional OLV in thoracoscopic surgery. A total of 67 patients were enrolled (34 with conventional OLV; 33 with preemptive OLV). Preemptive OLV was conducted by closing the DLT lumen to the non‐ventilated lung immediately upon assuming the lateral position with the distal port closed to the atmosphere until pleural opening (>6 minutes in all cases). Lung collapse was assessed at 1, 5, 10, 20, 30 and 40 minutes after pleural opening using a 10‐point rating scale (10: complete collapse). The primary end point was the duration from pleural opening to satisfactory lung collapse (score of 8). Secondary end points included PaO(2) and hypoxemia. The duration from pleural opening to satisfactory lung collapse was shorter in the preemptive OLV group (9.1 ± 1.2 vs. 14.1 ± 4.7 minutes, P < 0.01). PaO(2) was comparable between the two groups prior to anesthetic induction (T0), and 20 (T2), 40 minutes (T3) after pleural incision, but was lower in the preemptive OLV group at zero minutes after pleural incision (T1) (457.5 ± 19.0 vs. 483.1 ± 18.1 mmHg, P < 0.01). No patients in either group developed hypoxemia. In summary, preemptive OLV expedites lung collapse during thoracoscopic surgery with minimal safety concern. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6558447 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65584472019-06-13 Preemptive one lung ventilation enhances lung collapse during thoracoscopic surgery: A randomized controlled trial Zhang, Yunxiao Yan, Wanpu Fan, Zhiyi Kang, Xiaozheng Tan, Hongyu Fu, Hao Li, Zhendong Chen, Ke‐Neng Chen, Jiheng Thorac Cancer Original Articles In routine practice, one lung ventilation (OLV) is initiated upon pleural opening. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to compare lung collapse after preemptive OLV versus conventional OLV in thoracoscopic surgery. A total of 67 patients were enrolled (34 with conventional OLV; 33 with preemptive OLV). Preemptive OLV was conducted by closing the DLT lumen to the non‐ventilated lung immediately upon assuming the lateral position with the distal port closed to the atmosphere until pleural opening (>6 minutes in all cases). Lung collapse was assessed at 1, 5, 10, 20, 30 and 40 minutes after pleural opening using a 10‐point rating scale (10: complete collapse). The primary end point was the duration from pleural opening to satisfactory lung collapse (score of 8). Secondary end points included PaO(2) and hypoxemia. The duration from pleural opening to satisfactory lung collapse was shorter in the preemptive OLV group (9.1 ± 1.2 vs. 14.1 ± 4.7 minutes, P < 0.01). PaO(2) was comparable between the two groups prior to anesthetic induction (T0), and 20 (T2), 40 minutes (T3) after pleural incision, but was lower in the preemptive OLV group at zero minutes after pleural incision (T1) (457.5 ± 19.0 vs. 483.1 ± 18.1 mmHg, P < 0.01). No patients in either group developed hypoxemia. In summary, preemptive OLV expedites lung collapse during thoracoscopic surgery with minimal safety concern. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2019-05-21 2019-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6558447/ /pubmed/31115153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13091 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Zhang, Yunxiao Yan, Wanpu Fan, Zhiyi Kang, Xiaozheng Tan, Hongyu Fu, Hao Li, Zhendong Chen, Ke‐Neng Chen, Jiheng Preemptive one lung ventilation enhances lung collapse during thoracoscopic surgery: A randomized controlled trial |
title | Preemptive one lung ventilation enhances lung collapse during thoracoscopic surgery: A randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Preemptive one lung ventilation enhances lung collapse during thoracoscopic surgery: A randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Preemptive one lung ventilation enhances lung collapse during thoracoscopic surgery: A randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Preemptive one lung ventilation enhances lung collapse during thoracoscopic surgery: A randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Preemptive one lung ventilation enhances lung collapse during thoracoscopic surgery: A randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | preemptive one lung ventilation enhances lung collapse during thoracoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6558447/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31115153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13091 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangyunxiao preemptiveonelungventilationenhanceslungcollapseduringthoracoscopicsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT yanwanpu preemptiveonelungventilationenhanceslungcollapseduringthoracoscopicsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT fanzhiyi preemptiveonelungventilationenhanceslungcollapseduringthoracoscopicsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kangxiaozheng preemptiveonelungventilationenhanceslungcollapseduringthoracoscopicsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT tanhongyu preemptiveonelungventilationenhanceslungcollapseduringthoracoscopicsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT fuhao preemptiveonelungventilationenhanceslungcollapseduringthoracoscopicsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lizhendong preemptiveonelungventilationenhanceslungcollapseduringthoracoscopicsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT chenkeneng preemptiveonelungventilationenhanceslungcollapseduringthoracoscopicsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT chenjiheng preemptiveonelungventilationenhanceslungcollapseduringthoracoscopicsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial |