Cargando…

Preemptive one lung ventilation enhances lung collapse during thoracoscopic surgery: A randomized controlled trial

In routine practice, one lung ventilation (OLV) is initiated upon pleural opening. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to compare lung collapse after preemptive OLV versus conventional OLV in thoracoscopic surgery. A total of 67 patients were enrolled (34 with conventional OLV; 33 with preemp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Yunxiao, Yan, Wanpu, Fan, Zhiyi, Kang, Xiaozheng, Tan, Hongyu, Fu, Hao, Li, Zhendong, Chen, Ke‐Neng, Chen, Jiheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6558447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31115153
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13091
_version_ 1783425626727776256
author Zhang, Yunxiao
Yan, Wanpu
Fan, Zhiyi
Kang, Xiaozheng
Tan, Hongyu
Fu, Hao
Li, Zhendong
Chen, Ke‐Neng
Chen, Jiheng
author_facet Zhang, Yunxiao
Yan, Wanpu
Fan, Zhiyi
Kang, Xiaozheng
Tan, Hongyu
Fu, Hao
Li, Zhendong
Chen, Ke‐Neng
Chen, Jiheng
author_sort Zhang, Yunxiao
collection PubMed
description In routine practice, one lung ventilation (OLV) is initiated upon pleural opening. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to compare lung collapse after preemptive OLV versus conventional OLV in thoracoscopic surgery. A total of 67 patients were enrolled (34 with conventional OLV; 33 with preemptive OLV). Preemptive OLV was conducted by closing the DLT lumen to the non‐ventilated lung immediately upon assuming the lateral position with the distal port closed to the atmosphere until pleural opening (>6 minutes in all cases). Lung collapse was assessed at 1, 5, 10, 20, 30 and 40 minutes after pleural opening using a 10‐point rating scale (10: complete collapse). The primary end point was the duration from pleural opening to satisfactory lung collapse (score of 8). Secondary end points included PaO(2) and hypoxemia. The duration from pleural opening to satisfactory lung collapse was shorter in the preemptive OLV group (9.1 ± 1.2 vs. 14.1 ± 4.7 minutes, P < 0.01). PaO(2) was comparable between the two groups prior to anesthetic induction (T0), and 20 (T2), 40 minutes (T3) after pleural incision, but was lower in the preemptive OLV group at zero minutes after pleural incision (T1) (457.5 ± 19.0 vs. 483.1 ± 18.1 mmHg, P < 0.01). No patients in either group developed hypoxemia. In summary, preemptive OLV expedites lung collapse during thoracoscopic surgery with minimal safety concern.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6558447
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65584472019-06-13 Preemptive one lung ventilation enhances lung collapse during thoracoscopic surgery: A randomized controlled trial Zhang, Yunxiao Yan, Wanpu Fan, Zhiyi Kang, Xiaozheng Tan, Hongyu Fu, Hao Li, Zhendong Chen, Ke‐Neng Chen, Jiheng Thorac Cancer Original Articles In routine practice, one lung ventilation (OLV) is initiated upon pleural opening. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to compare lung collapse after preemptive OLV versus conventional OLV in thoracoscopic surgery. A total of 67 patients were enrolled (34 with conventional OLV; 33 with preemptive OLV). Preemptive OLV was conducted by closing the DLT lumen to the non‐ventilated lung immediately upon assuming the lateral position with the distal port closed to the atmosphere until pleural opening (>6 minutes in all cases). Lung collapse was assessed at 1, 5, 10, 20, 30 and 40 minutes after pleural opening using a 10‐point rating scale (10: complete collapse). The primary end point was the duration from pleural opening to satisfactory lung collapse (score of 8). Secondary end points included PaO(2) and hypoxemia. The duration from pleural opening to satisfactory lung collapse was shorter in the preemptive OLV group (9.1 ± 1.2 vs. 14.1 ± 4.7 minutes, P < 0.01). PaO(2) was comparable between the two groups prior to anesthetic induction (T0), and 20 (T2), 40 minutes (T3) after pleural incision, but was lower in the preemptive OLV group at zero minutes after pleural incision (T1) (457.5 ± 19.0 vs. 483.1 ± 18.1 mmHg, P < 0.01). No patients in either group developed hypoxemia. In summary, preemptive OLV expedites lung collapse during thoracoscopic surgery with minimal safety concern. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2019-05-21 2019-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6558447/ /pubmed/31115153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13091 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Zhang, Yunxiao
Yan, Wanpu
Fan, Zhiyi
Kang, Xiaozheng
Tan, Hongyu
Fu, Hao
Li, Zhendong
Chen, Ke‐Neng
Chen, Jiheng
Preemptive one lung ventilation enhances lung collapse during thoracoscopic surgery: A randomized controlled trial
title Preemptive one lung ventilation enhances lung collapse during thoracoscopic surgery: A randomized controlled trial
title_full Preemptive one lung ventilation enhances lung collapse during thoracoscopic surgery: A randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Preemptive one lung ventilation enhances lung collapse during thoracoscopic surgery: A randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Preemptive one lung ventilation enhances lung collapse during thoracoscopic surgery: A randomized controlled trial
title_short Preemptive one lung ventilation enhances lung collapse during thoracoscopic surgery: A randomized controlled trial
title_sort preemptive one lung ventilation enhances lung collapse during thoracoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled trial
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6558447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31115153
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13091
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangyunxiao preemptiveonelungventilationenhanceslungcollapseduringthoracoscopicsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yanwanpu preemptiveonelungventilationenhanceslungcollapseduringthoracoscopicsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT fanzhiyi preemptiveonelungventilationenhanceslungcollapseduringthoracoscopicsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kangxiaozheng preemptiveonelungventilationenhanceslungcollapseduringthoracoscopicsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT tanhongyu preemptiveonelungventilationenhanceslungcollapseduringthoracoscopicsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT fuhao preemptiveonelungventilationenhanceslungcollapseduringthoracoscopicsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lizhendong preemptiveonelungventilationenhanceslungcollapseduringthoracoscopicsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chenkeneng preemptiveonelungventilationenhanceslungcollapseduringthoracoscopicsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chenjiheng preemptiveonelungventilationenhanceslungcollapseduringthoracoscopicsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial