Cargando…

The prognostic comparison among unilateral, bilateral, synchronous bilateral, and metachronous bilateral breast cancer: A meta‐analysis of studies from recent decade (2008‐2018)

BACKGROUND: The incidence of bilateral breast cancer (BBC) is increasing nowadays comprising 2%‐11% of all breast cancer (BC). According to the interval time between the first and second cancer, BBC could be divided into synchronous (SBBC) and metachronous (MBBC). However, this interval time is quit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pan, Bo, Xu, Ying, Zhou, Yi‐Dong, Yao, Ru, Wu, Huan‐Wen, Zhu, Qing‐Li, Wang, Chang‐Jun, Mao, Feng, Lin, Yan, Shen, Song‐Jie, Sun, Qiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6558468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31038845
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2198
_version_ 1783425631756746752
author Pan, Bo
Xu, Ying
Zhou, Yi‐Dong
Yao, Ru
Wu, Huan‐Wen
Zhu, Qing‐Li
Wang, Chang‐Jun
Mao, Feng
Lin, Yan
Shen, Song‐Jie
Sun, Qiang
author_facet Pan, Bo
Xu, Ying
Zhou, Yi‐Dong
Yao, Ru
Wu, Huan‐Wen
Zhu, Qing‐Li
Wang, Chang‐Jun
Mao, Feng
Lin, Yan
Shen, Song‐Jie
Sun, Qiang
author_sort Pan, Bo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The incidence of bilateral breast cancer (BBC) is increasing nowadays comprising 2%‐11% of all breast cancer (BC). According to the interval time between the first and second cancer, BBC could be divided into synchronous (SBBC) and metachronous (MBBC). However, this interval time is quite different across studies. It remains controversial whether the survival of BBC, SBBC, and MBBC is similar or worse compared to that of unilateral breast cancer (UBC), and whether the survival of SBBC is similar or worse compared to MBBC. To better understand the survival of UBC, BBC, SBBC, and MBBC and how the interval time would influence the prognosis of SBBC and MBBC, we performed this meta‐analysis on studies from recent 10 years (2008‐2018). METHODS: Databases of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for relevant studies within recent 10 years. Hazard ratio (HR) was adopted to evaluate the difference of overall survival (OS) of UBC, BBC, SBBC, and MBBC. HR of OS comparisons were performed between BBC vs UBC, SBBC vs UBC, MBBC vs UBC, and SBBC vs MBBC with 3, 6, 12 months as the interval time, respectively. RESULTS: There were 15 studies of 72 302 UBC and 2912 BBC included in the meta‐analysis. The summary HR of OS comparison between BBC vs UBC was 1.68 (95% CI: 1.28‐2.20), SBBC vs UBC was 2.01 (95% CI: 1.14‐3.55), MBBC vs UBC was 3.22 (95% CI: 0.75‐13.78). When 3, 6, 12 months were used as the interval time, the summary HR of the OS comparison between of SBBC vs MBBC were 0.64 (95% CI: 0.44‐0.94), 1.17 (95% CI: 0.84‐1.63) and 1.45 (95% CI: 1.10‐1.92), respectively. CONCLUSION: BBC and SBBC showed worse prognosis in terms of OS compared to UBC while MBBC manifested similar or non‐superior survival as UBC. The OS comparison between SBBC and MBBC changed with different interval time used. The longer the interval time used, the worse the survival of SBBC. SBBC with interval of 3‐12 months between the two cancers had the worst prognosis. When 6 months was used to differentiate SBBC from MBBC, these two clinical entities showed similar OS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6558468
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65584682019-06-13 The prognostic comparison among unilateral, bilateral, synchronous bilateral, and metachronous bilateral breast cancer: A meta‐analysis of studies from recent decade (2008‐2018) Pan, Bo Xu, Ying Zhou, Yi‐Dong Yao, Ru Wu, Huan‐Wen Zhu, Qing‐Li Wang, Chang‐Jun Mao, Feng Lin, Yan Shen, Song‐Jie Sun, Qiang Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Research BACKGROUND: The incidence of bilateral breast cancer (BBC) is increasing nowadays comprising 2%‐11% of all breast cancer (BC). According to the interval time between the first and second cancer, BBC could be divided into synchronous (SBBC) and metachronous (MBBC). However, this interval time is quite different across studies. It remains controversial whether the survival of BBC, SBBC, and MBBC is similar or worse compared to that of unilateral breast cancer (UBC), and whether the survival of SBBC is similar or worse compared to MBBC. To better understand the survival of UBC, BBC, SBBC, and MBBC and how the interval time would influence the prognosis of SBBC and MBBC, we performed this meta‐analysis on studies from recent 10 years (2008‐2018). METHODS: Databases of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for relevant studies within recent 10 years. Hazard ratio (HR) was adopted to evaluate the difference of overall survival (OS) of UBC, BBC, SBBC, and MBBC. HR of OS comparisons were performed between BBC vs UBC, SBBC vs UBC, MBBC vs UBC, and SBBC vs MBBC with 3, 6, 12 months as the interval time, respectively. RESULTS: There were 15 studies of 72 302 UBC and 2912 BBC included in the meta‐analysis. The summary HR of OS comparison between BBC vs UBC was 1.68 (95% CI: 1.28‐2.20), SBBC vs UBC was 2.01 (95% CI: 1.14‐3.55), MBBC vs UBC was 3.22 (95% CI: 0.75‐13.78). When 3, 6, 12 months were used as the interval time, the summary HR of the OS comparison between of SBBC vs MBBC were 0.64 (95% CI: 0.44‐0.94), 1.17 (95% CI: 0.84‐1.63) and 1.45 (95% CI: 1.10‐1.92), respectively. CONCLUSION: BBC and SBBC showed worse prognosis in terms of OS compared to UBC while MBBC manifested similar or non‐superior survival as UBC. The OS comparison between SBBC and MBBC changed with different interval time used. The longer the interval time used, the worse the survival of SBBC. SBBC with interval of 3‐12 months between the two cancers had the worst prognosis. When 6 months was used to differentiate SBBC from MBBC, these two clinical entities showed similar OS. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6558468/ /pubmed/31038845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2198 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Cancer Research
Pan, Bo
Xu, Ying
Zhou, Yi‐Dong
Yao, Ru
Wu, Huan‐Wen
Zhu, Qing‐Li
Wang, Chang‐Jun
Mao, Feng
Lin, Yan
Shen, Song‐Jie
Sun, Qiang
The prognostic comparison among unilateral, bilateral, synchronous bilateral, and metachronous bilateral breast cancer: A meta‐analysis of studies from recent decade (2008‐2018)
title The prognostic comparison among unilateral, bilateral, synchronous bilateral, and metachronous bilateral breast cancer: A meta‐analysis of studies from recent decade (2008‐2018)
title_full The prognostic comparison among unilateral, bilateral, synchronous bilateral, and metachronous bilateral breast cancer: A meta‐analysis of studies from recent decade (2008‐2018)
title_fullStr The prognostic comparison among unilateral, bilateral, synchronous bilateral, and metachronous bilateral breast cancer: A meta‐analysis of studies from recent decade (2008‐2018)
title_full_unstemmed The prognostic comparison among unilateral, bilateral, synchronous bilateral, and metachronous bilateral breast cancer: A meta‐analysis of studies from recent decade (2008‐2018)
title_short The prognostic comparison among unilateral, bilateral, synchronous bilateral, and metachronous bilateral breast cancer: A meta‐analysis of studies from recent decade (2008‐2018)
title_sort prognostic comparison among unilateral, bilateral, synchronous bilateral, and metachronous bilateral breast cancer: a meta‐analysis of studies from recent decade (2008‐2018)
topic Clinical Cancer Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6558468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31038845
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2198
work_keys_str_mv AT panbo theprognosticcomparisonamongunilateralbilateralsynchronousbilateralandmetachronousbilateralbreastcancerametaanalysisofstudiesfromrecentdecade20082018
AT xuying theprognosticcomparisonamongunilateralbilateralsynchronousbilateralandmetachronousbilateralbreastcancerametaanalysisofstudiesfromrecentdecade20082018
AT zhouyidong theprognosticcomparisonamongunilateralbilateralsynchronousbilateralandmetachronousbilateralbreastcancerametaanalysisofstudiesfromrecentdecade20082018
AT yaoru theprognosticcomparisonamongunilateralbilateralsynchronousbilateralandmetachronousbilateralbreastcancerametaanalysisofstudiesfromrecentdecade20082018
AT wuhuanwen theprognosticcomparisonamongunilateralbilateralsynchronousbilateralandmetachronousbilateralbreastcancerametaanalysisofstudiesfromrecentdecade20082018
AT zhuqingli theprognosticcomparisonamongunilateralbilateralsynchronousbilateralandmetachronousbilateralbreastcancerametaanalysisofstudiesfromrecentdecade20082018
AT wangchangjun theprognosticcomparisonamongunilateralbilateralsynchronousbilateralandmetachronousbilateralbreastcancerametaanalysisofstudiesfromrecentdecade20082018
AT maofeng theprognosticcomparisonamongunilateralbilateralsynchronousbilateralandmetachronousbilateralbreastcancerametaanalysisofstudiesfromrecentdecade20082018
AT linyan theprognosticcomparisonamongunilateralbilateralsynchronousbilateralandmetachronousbilateralbreastcancerametaanalysisofstudiesfromrecentdecade20082018
AT shensongjie theprognosticcomparisonamongunilateralbilateralsynchronousbilateralandmetachronousbilateralbreastcancerametaanalysisofstudiesfromrecentdecade20082018
AT sunqiang theprognosticcomparisonamongunilateralbilateralsynchronousbilateralandmetachronousbilateralbreastcancerametaanalysisofstudiesfromrecentdecade20082018
AT panbo prognosticcomparisonamongunilateralbilateralsynchronousbilateralandmetachronousbilateralbreastcancerametaanalysisofstudiesfromrecentdecade20082018
AT xuying prognosticcomparisonamongunilateralbilateralsynchronousbilateralandmetachronousbilateralbreastcancerametaanalysisofstudiesfromrecentdecade20082018
AT zhouyidong prognosticcomparisonamongunilateralbilateralsynchronousbilateralandmetachronousbilateralbreastcancerametaanalysisofstudiesfromrecentdecade20082018
AT yaoru prognosticcomparisonamongunilateralbilateralsynchronousbilateralandmetachronousbilateralbreastcancerametaanalysisofstudiesfromrecentdecade20082018
AT wuhuanwen prognosticcomparisonamongunilateralbilateralsynchronousbilateralandmetachronousbilateralbreastcancerametaanalysisofstudiesfromrecentdecade20082018
AT zhuqingli prognosticcomparisonamongunilateralbilateralsynchronousbilateralandmetachronousbilateralbreastcancerametaanalysisofstudiesfromrecentdecade20082018
AT wangchangjun prognosticcomparisonamongunilateralbilateralsynchronousbilateralandmetachronousbilateralbreastcancerametaanalysisofstudiesfromrecentdecade20082018
AT maofeng prognosticcomparisonamongunilateralbilateralsynchronousbilateralandmetachronousbilateralbreastcancerametaanalysisofstudiesfromrecentdecade20082018
AT linyan prognosticcomparisonamongunilateralbilateralsynchronousbilateralandmetachronousbilateralbreastcancerametaanalysisofstudiesfromrecentdecade20082018
AT shensongjie prognosticcomparisonamongunilateralbilateralsynchronousbilateralandmetachronousbilateralbreastcancerametaanalysisofstudiesfromrecentdecade20082018
AT sunqiang prognosticcomparisonamongunilateralbilateralsynchronousbilateralandmetachronousbilateralbreastcancerametaanalysisofstudiesfromrecentdecade20082018