Cargando…
Safety and efficacy of thermal ablation for subpleural lung cancers
BACKGROUND: The study was conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of thermal ablation for the treatment of subpleural lung cancer. METHODS: Eighty‐nine patients with 101 subpleural lung cancers were identified between January 2012 and July 2018 in our database and included in this study. Tumors...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6558492/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31020801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13068 |
_version_ | 1783425637326782464 |
---|---|
author | Cao, Fei Xie, Lin Qi, Han Chen, Shuanggang Shen, Lujun Song, Ze Fan, Weijun |
author_facet | Cao, Fei Xie, Lin Qi, Han Chen, Shuanggang Shen, Lujun Song, Ze Fan, Weijun |
author_sort | Cao, Fei |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The study was conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of thermal ablation for the treatment of subpleural lung cancer. METHODS: Eighty‐nine patients with 101 subpleural lung cancers were identified between January 2012 and July 2018 in our database and included in this study. Tumors were classified as adhering to cervical, costal, diaphragmatic, and mediastinal pleurae. Lesions were categorized based on their relationship to the pleura: close to the pleura, causing pleural indentation, and involving the pleura. The complete ablation rate, local progression‐free survival, complications, and associated factors were analyzed. RESULTS: Subpleural lung cancers included lesions located under costal (n = 69), mediastinal (n = 17), cervical (n = 8), and diaphragmatic (n = 7) pleurae. The rate of complete ablation was 87.1% and the local progression‐free survival rates at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months were 86%, 77%, 75%, and 64%, respectively. Tumor size was the most important factor influencing technique efficacy (P < 0.05), with a complete ablation rate of only 55.6% in lung cancers measuring > 30 mm. There were nine (10.11%) major complications, including one chest abscess, five cases of pneumothorax, and three cases of hemothorax. The occurrence of major complications was associated with increased levels of pain within 48 hours post‐procedure (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Local thermal ablation is a safe and effective treatment for subpleural lung cancers. Tumor size was the most significant factor affecting technique efficacy. Post‐procedure pain indicated the possibility of major complications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6558492 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65584922019-06-13 Safety and efficacy of thermal ablation for subpleural lung cancers Cao, Fei Xie, Lin Qi, Han Chen, Shuanggang Shen, Lujun Song, Ze Fan, Weijun Thorac Cancer Original Articles BACKGROUND: The study was conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of thermal ablation for the treatment of subpleural lung cancer. METHODS: Eighty‐nine patients with 101 subpleural lung cancers were identified between January 2012 and July 2018 in our database and included in this study. Tumors were classified as adhering to cervical, costal, diaphragmatic, and mediastinal pleurae. Lesions were categorized based on their relationship to the pleura: close to the pleura, causing pleural indentation, and involving the pleura. The complete ablation rate, local progression‐free survival, complications, and associated factors were analyzed. RESULTS: Subpleural lung cancers included lesions located under costal (n = 69), mediastinal (n = 17), cervical (n = 8), and diaphragmatic (n = 7) pleurae. The rate of complete ablation was 87.1% and the local progression‐free survival rates at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months were 86%, 77%, 75%, and 64%, respectively. Tumor size was the most important factor influencing technique efficacy (P < 0.05), with a complete ablation rate of only 55.6% in lung cancers measuring > 30 mm. There were nine (10.11%) major complications, including one chest abscess, five cases of pneumothorax, and three cases of hemothorax. The occurrence of major complications was associated with increased levels of pain within 48 hours post‐procedure (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Local thermal ablation is a safe and effective treatment for subpleural lung cancers. Tumor size was the most significant factor affecting technique efficacy. Post‐procedure pain indicated the possibility of major complications. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2019-04-25 2019-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6558492/ /pubmed/31020801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13068 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Cao, Fei Xie, Lin Qi, Han Chen, Shuanggang Shen, Lujun Song, Ze Fan, Weijun Safety and efficacy of thermal ablation for subpleural lung cancers |
title | Safety and efficacy of thermal ablation for subpleural lung cancers |
title_full | Safety and efficacy of thermal ablation for subpleural lung cancers |
title_fullStr | Safety and efficacy of thermal ablation for subpleural lung cancers |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety and efficacy of thermal ablation for subpleural lung cancers |
title_short | Safety and efficacy of thermal ablation for subpleural lung cancers |
title_sort | safety and efficacy of thermal ablation for subpleural lung cancers |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6558492/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31020801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13068 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT caofei safetyandefficacyofthermalablationforsubpleurallungcancers AT xielin safetyandefficacyofthermalablationforsubpleurallungcancers AT qihan safetyandefficacyofthermalablationforsubpleurallungcancers AT chenshuanggang safetyandefficacyofthermalablationforsubpleurallungcancers AT shenlujun safetyandefficacyofthermalablationforsubpleurallungcancers AT songze safetyandefficacyofthermalablationforsubpleurallungcancers AT fanweijun safetyandefficacyofthermalablationforsubpleurallungcancers |