Cargando…

Safety and efficacy of thermal ablation for subpleural lung cancers

BACKGROUND: The study was conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of thermal ablation for the treatment of subpleural lung cancer. METHODS: Eighty‐nine patients with 101 subpleural lung cancers were identified between January 2012 and July 2018 in our database and included in this study. Tumors...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cao, Fei, Xie, Lin, Qi, Han, Chen, Shuanggang, Shen, Lujun, Song, Ze, Fan, Weijun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6558492/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31020801
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13068
_version_ 1783425637326782464
author Cao, Fei
Xie, Lin
Qi, Han
Chen, Shuanggang
Shen, Lujun
Song, Ze
Fan, Weijun
author_facet Cao, Fei
Xie, Lin
Qi, Han
Chen, Shuanggang
Shen, Lujun
Song, Ze
Fan, Weijun
author_sort Cao, Fei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The study was conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of thermal ablation for the treatment of subpleural lung cancer. METHODS: Eighty‐nine patients with 101 subpleural lung cancers were identified between January 2012 and July 2018 in our database and included in this study. Tumors were classified as adhering to cervical, costal, diaphragmatic, and mediastinal pleurae. Lesions were categorized based on their relationship to the pleura: close to the pleura, causing pleural indentation, and involving the pleura. The complete ablation rate, local progression‐free survival, complications, and associated factors were analyzed. RESULTS: Subpleural lung cancers included lesions located under costal (n = 69), mediastinal (n = 17), cervical (n = 8), and diaphragmatic (n = 7) pleurae. The rate of complete ablation was 87.1% and the local progression‐free survival rates at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months were 86%, 77%, 75%, and 64%, respectively. Tumor size was the most important factor influencing technique efficacy (P < 0.05), with a complete ablation rate of only 55.6% in lung cancers measuring > 30 mm. There were nine (10.11%) major complications, including one chest abscess, five cases of pneumothorax, and three cases of hemothorax. The occurrence of major complications was associated with increased levels of pain within 48 hours post‐procedure (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Local thermal ablation is a safe and effective treatment for subpleural lung cancers. Tumor size was the most significant factor affecting technique efficacy. Post‐procedure pain indicated the possibility of major complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6558492
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65584922019-06-13 Safety and efficacy of thermal ablation for subpleural lung cancers Cao, Fei Xie, Lin Qi, Han Chen, Shuanggang Shen, Lujun Song, Ze Fan, Weijun Thorac Cancer Original Articles BACKGROUND: The study was conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of thermal ablation for the treatment of subpleural lung cancer. METHODS: Eighty‐nine patients with 101 subpleural lung cancers were identified between January 2012 and July 2018 in our database and included in this study. Tumors were classified as adhering to cervical, costal, diaphragmatic, and mediastinal pleurae. Lesions were categorized based on their relationship to the pleura: close to the pleura, causing pleural indentation, and involving the pleura. The complete ablation rate, local progression‐free survival, complications, and associated factors were analyzed. RESULTS: Subpleural lung cancers included lesions located under costal (n = 69), mediastinal (n = 17), cervical (n = 8), and diaphragmatic (n = 7) pleurae. The rate of complete ablation was 87.1% and the local progression‐free survival rates at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months were 86%, 77%, 75%, and 64%, respectively. Tumor size was the most important factor influencing technique efficacy (P < 0.05), with a complete ablation rate of only 55.6% in lung cancers measuring > 30 mm. There were nine (10.11%) major complications, including one chest abscess, five cases of pneumothorax, and three cases of hemothorax. The occurrence of major complications was associated with increased levels of pain within 48 hours post‐procedure (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Local thermal ablation is a safe and effective treatment for subpleural lung cancers. Tumor size was the most significant factor affecting technique efficacy. Post‐procedure pain indicated the possibility of major complications. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2019-04-25 2019-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6558492/ /pubmed/31020801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13068 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Cao, Fei
Xie, Lin
Qi, Han
Chen, Shuanggang
Shen, Lujun
Song, Ze
Fan, Weijun
Safety and efficacy of thermal ablation for subpleural lung cancers
title Safety and efficacy of thermal ablation for subpleural lung cancers
title_full Safety and efficacy of thermal ablation for subpleural lung cancers
title_fullStr Safety and efficacy of thermal ablation for subpleural lung cancers
title_full_unstemmed Safety and efficacy of thermal ablation for subpleural lung cancers
title_short Safety and efficacy of thermal ablation for subpleural lung cancers
title_sort safety and efficacy of thermal ablation for subpleural lung cancers
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6558492/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31020801
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13068
work_keys_str_mv AT caofei safetyandefficacyofthermalablationforsubpleurallungcancers
AT xielin safetyandefficacyofthermalablationforsubpleurallungcancers
AT qihan safetyandefficacyofthermalablationforsubpleurallungcancers
AT chenshuanggang safetyandefficacyofthermalablationforsubpleurallungcancers
AT shenlujun safetyandefficacyofthermalablationforsubpleurallungcancers
AT songze safetyandefficacyofthermalablationforsubpleurallungcancers
AT fanweijun safetyandefficacyofthermalablationforsubpleurallungcancers