Cargando…

Improvement of Chemotherapy Solutions Production Procedure in a Hospital Central Chemotherapy Preparation Unit: A Systematic Risk Assessment to Prevent Avoidable Harm in Cancer Patients

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to reevaluate and improve the quality and safety of the chemotherapy preparation in a Central Chemotherapy Preparation Unit of a Public Hospital. METHODS: A failure modes, effects, and criticality analysis (FMECA) was conducted by a multidisciplinary team. All pote...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bourika, Klio, Koutras, Angelos, Kalofonos, Haralambos, Vicha, Anna, Tsiata, Ekaterini, Papadimitriou, Evangelia, Avgoustakis, Konstantinos, Panagi, Zoi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6558536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31217699
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1179554919852933
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to reevaluate and improve the quality and safety of the chemotherapy preparation in a Central Chemotherapy Preparation Unit of a Public Hospital. METHODS: A failure modes, effects, and criticality analysis (FMECA) was conducted by a multidisciplinary team. All potential failure modes at each stage of the chemotherapy preparation were recorded, and the associated risks were scored for their severity, occurrence, and detectability with a risk priority number (RPN). Corrective actions were suggested, and new RPNs were estimated for the modified process. RESULTS: Failure modes, effects, and criticality analysis and priority matrix construction, revealed that the partial compliance of Unit’s premises with international standards (RPN(stage): 307), the human errors throughout the compounding (RPN(stage): 223)—labeling (RPN(stage): 216)—prescribing (RPN(stage): 198) steps, and the violation of working protocols by employees (RPN(stage): 215), were the most important risks for which either urgent or immediate corrective actions had to be taken. Modifying the procedure through the proposed corrective actions is expected to lead to a significant (71.3%) risk containment, with a total RPN(preparation process) reduction from 2102 to 604. CONCLUSIONS: Failure modes, effects, and criticality analysis and priority matrix development identified and prioritized effectively the risks associated with chemotherapy preparation allowing for the improvement of health services to cancer patients.