Cargando…

STandard versus Accelerated initiation of Renal Replacement Therapy in Acute Kidney Injury: Study Protocol for a Multi-National, Multi-Center, Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: The optimal timing of renal replacement therapy (RRT) initiation in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: In critically ill patients with AKI, to determine whether the accelerated initiation of RRT reduces mortality compared to a strateg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6558541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31218013
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2054358119852937
_version_ 1783425648025403392
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The optimal timing of renal replacement therapy (RRT) initiation in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: In critically ill patients with AKI, to determine whether the accelerated initiation of RRT reduces mortality compared to a strategy of standard RRT initiation whereby RRT is initiated if urgent complications of AKI arise or based on clinician judgment. DESIGN: Pragmatic allocation-concealed open-label randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Up to 170 centers in Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Finland, New Zealand, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. PATIENTS: We will enroll at least 2,866 critically ill patients with AKI stages 2 or 3 (defined as doubling of serum creatinine from baseline or serum creatinine ≥354 µmol/L with increase of ≥27 µmol/L from baseline or urine output <6 mL/kg in preceding 12 hours). Patients will be excluded if 1 or more of the following is/are present: potassium >5.5 mmol/L; bicarbonate <15 mmol/L; concomitant intoxication necessitating RRT; philosophy of care precluding escalation to RRT; any RRT in preceding 2 months; kidney transplant within the past year; preexisting estimated glomerular filtration rate <20 mL/min/1.73 m(2); AKI etiology attributable to obstruction, glomerulonephritis, vasculitis, microangiopathy, or acute interstitial nephritis; clinician opinion that urgent RRT is mandated; or clinician opinion that RRT must be deferred. METHODS: Participants will be randomized to one of two strategies: accelerated RRT initiation, which entails the initiation of RRT within 12 hours of the patient fulfilling all eligibility criteria, or standard RRT initiation, whereby clinicians would be discouraged from initiating RRT unless a conventional trigger for RRT initiation arises or if AKI persists for ≥72 hours. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome is all-cause mortality at 90 days following randomization. Key secondary outcomes include RRT dependence, residual kidney function, health services use, and health-related quality of life, all assessed at 90 days after randomization. In jurisdictions where it is feasible, participants will be followed through day 365 using linked administrative data. RESULTS: Through March 18, 2019, we have recruited 2623 (92% of target) participants. LIMITATIONS: Reliance on physician declaration of equipoise may create heterogeneity across the trial population; open-label design may introduce bias and uneven postrandomization cointerventions; variations in practice (eg, choice of RRT modality and RRT prescription) likely exist across sites. CONCLUSIONS: Once complete, the STARRT-AKI trial will provide the most robust evidence to date to guide clinical practice on the optimal timing of RRT initiation among critically ill patients with AKI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02568722.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6558541
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65585412019-06-19 STandard versus Accelerated initiation of Renal Replacement Therapy in Acute Kidney Injury: Study Protocol for a Multi-National, Multi-Center, Randomized Controlled Trial Can J Kidney Health Dis Study Protocol BACKGROUND: The optimal timing of renal replacement therapy (RRT) initiation in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: In critically ill patients with AKI, to determine whether the accelerated initiation of RRT reduces mortality compared to a strategy of standard RRT initiation whereby RRT is initiated if urgent complications of AKI arise or based on clinician judgment. DESIGN: Pragmatic allocation-concealed open-label randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Up to 170 centers in Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Finland, New Zealand, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. PATIENTS: We will enroll at least 2,866 critically ill patients with AKI stages 2 or 3 (defined as doubling of serum creatinine from baseline or serum creatinine ≥354 µmol/L with increase of ≥27 µmol/L from baseline or urine output <6 mL/kg in preceding 12 hours). Patients will be excluded if 1 or more of the following is/are present: potassium >5.5 mmol/L; bicarbonate <15 mmol/L; concomitant intoxication necessitating RRT; philosophy of care precluding escalation to RRT; any RRT in preceding 2 months; kidney transplant within the past year; preexisting estimated glomerular filtration rate <20 mL/min/1.73 m(2); AKI etiology attributable to obstruction, glomerulonephritis, vasculitis, microangiopathy, or acute interstitial nephritis; clinician opinion that urgent RRT is mandated; or clinician opinion that RRT must be deferred. METHODS: Participants will be randomized to one of two strategies: accelerated RRT initiation, which entails the initiation of RRT within 12 hours of the patient fulfilling all eligibility criteria, or standard RRT initiation, whereby clinicians would be discouraged from initiating RRT unless a conventional trigger for RRT initiation arises or if AKI persists for ≥72 hours. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome is all-cause mortality at 90 days following randomization. Key secondary outcomes include RRT dependence, residual kidney function, health services use, and health-related quality of life, all assessed at 90 days after randomization. In jurisdictions where it is feasible, participants will be followed through day 365 using linked administrative data. RESULTS: Through March 18, 2019, we have recruited 2623 (92% of target) participants. LIMITATIONS: Reliance on physician declaration of equipoise may create heterogeneity across the trial population; open-label design may introduce bias and uneven postrandomization cointerventions; variations in practice (eg, choice of RRT modality and RRT prescription) likely exist across sites. CONCLUSIONS: Once complete, the STARRT-AKI trial will provide the most robust evidence to date to guide clinical practice on the optimal timing of RRT initiation among critically ill patients with AKI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02568722. SAGE Publications 2019-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6558541/ /pubmed/31218013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2054358119852937 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Study Protocol
STandard versus Accelerated initiation of Renal Replacement Therapy in Acute Kidney Injury: Study Protocol for a Multi-National, Multi-Center, Randomized Controlled Trial
title STandard versus Accelerated initiation of Renal Replacement Therapy in Acute Kidney Injury: Study Protocol for a Multi-National, Multi-Center, Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full STandard versus Accelerated initiation of Renal Replacement Therapy in Acute Kidney Injury: Study Protocol for a Multi-National, Multi-Center, Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr STandard versus Accelerated initiation of Renal Replacement Therapy in Acute Kidney Injury: Study Protocol for a Multi-National, Multi-Center, Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed STandard versus Accelerated initiation of Renal Replacement Therapy in Acute Kidney Injury: Study Protocol for a Multi-National, Multi-Center, Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short STandard versus Accelerated initiation of Renal Replacement Therapy in Acute Kidney Injury: Study Protocol for a Multi-National, Multi-Center, Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort standard versus accelerated initiation of renal replacement therapy in acute kidney injury: study protocol for a multi-national, multi-center, randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6558541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31218013
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2054358119852937
work_keys_str_mv AT standardversusacceleratedinitiationofrenalreplacementtherapyinacutekidneyinjurystudyprotocolforamultinationalmulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial