Cargando…
Identifying and prioritising midwifery care process metrics and indicators: a Delphi survey and stakeholder consensus process
BACKGROUND: Measuring care processes is an important component of any effort to improve care quality, however knowing the appropriate metrics to measure is a challenge both in Ireland and other countries. Quality of midwifery care depends on the expert knowledge of the midwife and her/his contributi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6558705/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31182055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2346-z |
_version_ | 1783425680776626176 |
---|---|
author | Devane, Declan Barrett, Nora Gallen, Anne O’Reilly, Mary Frances Nadin, Margaret Conway, Gillian Biesty, Linda Smith, Valerie |
author_facet | Devane, Declan Barrett, Nora Gallen, Anne O’Reilly, Mary Frances Nadin, Margaret Conway, Gillian Biesty, Linda Smith, Valerie |
author_sort | Devane, Declan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Measuring care processes is an important component of any effort to improve care quality, however knowing the appropriate metrics to measure is a challenge both in Ireland and other countries. Quality of midwifery care depends on the expert knowledge of the midwife and her/his contribution to women and their babies’ safety in the healthcare environment. Therefore midwives need to be able to clearly articulate and measure what it is that they do, the dimensions of their professional practice frequently referred to as midwifery care processes. The objective of this paper is to report on the development and prioritisation of a national suite of Quality Care Metrics (QCM), and their associated indicators, for midwifery care processes in Ireland. METHODS: The study involved four discrete, yet complimentary, phases; i) a systematic literature review to identify midwifery care process metrics and their associated measurement indicators; ii) a two-round, online Delphi survey of midwives to develop consensus on the set of midwifery care process metrics to be measured; iii) a two-round online Delphi survey of midwives to develop consensus on the indicators that will be used to measure prioritised metrics; and iv) a face-to-face consensus meeting with midwives to review the findings and achieve consensus on the final suite of metrics and indicators. RESULTS: Following the consensus meeting, 18 metrics and 93 indicators were prioritised for inclusion in the suite of QCM Midwifery Metrics. These metrics span the pregnancy, birth and postpartum periods. CONCLUSION: The development of this suite of process metrics and indicators for midwifery care provides an opportunity for measuring the safety and quality of midwifery care in Ireland and for adapting internationally. This initial work should be followed by a rigorous evaluation of the impact of the new suite of metrics on midwifery care processes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-019-2346-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6558705 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65587052019-06-13 Identifying and prioritising midwifery care process metrics and indicators: a Delphi survey and stakeholder consensus process Devane, Declan Barrett, Nora Gallen, Anne O’Reilly, Mary Frances Nadin, Margaret Conway, Gillian Biesty, Linda Smith, Valerie BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Measuring care processes is an important component of any effort to improve care quality, however knowing the appropriate metrics to measure is a challenge both in Ireland and other countries. Quality of midwifery care depends on the expert knowledge of the midwife and her/his contribution to women and their babies’ safety in the healthcare environment. Therefore midwives need to be able to clearly articulate and measure what it is that they do, the dimensions of their professional practice frequently referred to as midwifery care processes. The objective of this paper is to report on the development and prioritisation of a national suite of Quality Care Metrics (QCM), and their associated indicators, for midwifery care processes in Ireland. METHODS: The study involved four discrete, yet complimentary, phases; i) a systematic literature review to identify midwifery care process metrics and their associated measurement indicators; ii) a two-round, online Delphi survey of midwives to develop consensus on the set of midwifery care process metrics to be measured; iii) a two-round online Delphi survey of midwives to develop consensus on the indicators that will be used to measure prioritised metrics; and iv) a face-to-face consensus meeting with midwives to review the findings and achieve consensus on the final suite of metrics and indicators. RESULTS: Following the consensus meeting, 18 metrics and 93 indicators were prioritised for inclusion in the suite of QCM Midwifery Metrics. These metrics span the pregnancy, birth and postpartum periods. CONCLUSION: The development of this suite of process metrics and indicators for midwifery care provides an opportunity for measuring the safety and quality of midwifery care in Ireland and for adapting internationally. This initial work should be followed by a rigorous evaluation of the impact of the new suite of metrics on midwifery care processes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-019-2346-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6558705/ /pubmed/31182055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2346-z Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Devane, Declan Barrett, Nora Gallen, Anne O’Reilly, Mary Frances Nadin, Margaret Conway, Gillian Biesty, Linda Smith, Valerie Identifying and prioritising midwifery care process metrics and indicators: a Delphi survey and stakeholder consensus process |
title | Identifying and prioritising midwifery care process metrics and indicators: a Delphi survey and stakeholder consensus process |
title_full | Identifying and prioritising midwifery care process metrics and indicators: a Delphi survey and stakeholder consensus process |
title_fullStr | Identifying and prioritising midwifery care process metrics and indicators: a Delphi survey and stakeholder consensus process |
title_full_unstemmed | Identifying and prioritising midwifery care process metrics and indicators: a Delphi survey and stakeholder consensus process |
title_short | Identifying and prioritising midwifery care process metrics and indicators: a Delphi survey and stakeholder consensus process |
title_sort | identifying and prioritising midwifery care process metrics and indicators: a delphi survey and stakeholder consensus process |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6558705/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31182055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2346-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT devanedeclan identifyingandprioritisingmidwiferycareprocessmetricsandindicatorsadelphisurveyandstakeholderconsensusprocess AT barrettnora identifyingandprioritisingmidwiferycareprocessmetricsandindicatorsadelphisurveyandstakeholderconsensusprocess AT gallenanne identifyingandprioritisingmidwiferycareprocessmetricsandindicatorsadelphisurveyandstakeholderconsensusprocess AT oreillymaryfrances identifyingandprioritisingmidwiferycareprocessmetricsandindicatorsadelphisurveyandstakeholderconsensusprocess AT nadinmargaret identifyingandprioritisingmidwiferycareprocessmetricsandindicatorsadelphisurveyandstakeholderconsensusprocess AT conwaygillian identifyingandprioritisingmidwiferycareprocessmetricsandindicatorsadelphisurveyandstakeholderconsensusprocess AT biestylinda identifyingandprioritisingmidwiferycareprocessmetricsandindicatorsadelphisurveyandstakeholderconsensusprocess AT smithvalerie identifyingandprioritisingmidwiferycareprocessmetricsandindicatorsadelphisurveyandstakeholderconsensusprocess |