Cargando…

Study protocol: a mixed-methods study of women’s healthcare in the safety net after Affordable Care Act implementation – EVERYWOMAN

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based reproductive care reduces morbidity and mortality for women and their children, decreases health disparities and saves money. Community health centres (CHCs) are a key point of access to reproductive and primary care services for women who are publicly insured, uninsured o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cottrell, Erika, Darney, Blair G., Marino, Miguel, Templeton, Anna Rose, Jacob, Lorie, Hoopes, Megan, Rodriguez, Maria, Hatch, Brigit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6558747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31186028
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0445-y
_version_ 1783425691002339328
author Cottrell, Erika
Darney, Blair G.
Marino, Miguel
Templeton, Anna Rose
Jacob, Lorie
Hoopes, Megan
Rodriguez, Maria
Hatch, Brigit
author_facet Cottrell, Erika
Darney, Blair G.
Marino, Miguel
Templeton, Anna Rose
Jacob, Lorie
Hoopes, Megan
Rodriguez, Maria
Hatch, Brigit
author_sort Cottrell, Erika
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Evidence-based reproductive care reduces morbidity and mortality for women and their children, decreases health disparities and saves money. Community health centres (CHCs) are a key point of access to reproductive and primary care services for women who are publicly insured, uninsured or unable to pay for care. Women of reproductive age (15–44 years) comprise just of a quarter (26%) of the total CHC patient population, with higher than average proportions of women of colour, women with lower income and educational status and social challenges (e.g. housing). Such factors are associated with poorer reproductive health outcomes across contraceptive, preventive and pregnancy-related services. The Affordable Care Act (ACA) prioritised reproductive health as an essential component of women’s preventive services to counter these barriers and increase women’s access to care. In 2012, the United States Supreme Court ruled ACA implementation through Medicaid expansion as optional, creating a natural experiment to measure the ACA’s impact on women’s reproductive care delivery and health outcomes. METHODS: This paper describes a 5-year, mixed-methods study comparing women’s contraceptive, preventive, prenatal and postpartum care before and after ACA implementation and between Medicaid expansion and non-expansion states. Quantitative assessment will leverage electronic health record data from the ADVANCE Clinical Research Network, a network of over 130 CHCs in 24 states, to describe care and identify patient, practice and state-level factors associated with provision of recommended evidence-based care. Qualitative assessment will include patient, provider and practice level interviews to understand perceptions and utilisation of reproductive healthcare in CHC settings. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this will be the first study using patient level electronic health record data from multiple states to assess the impact of ACA implementation in conjunction with other practice and policy level factors such as Title X funding or 1115 Medicaid waivers. Findings will be relevant to policy and practice, informing efforts to enhance the provision of timely, evidence-based reproductive care, improve health outcomes and reduce disparities among women. Patient, provider and practice-level interviews will serve to contextualise our findings and develop subsequent studies and interventions to support women’s healthcare provision in CHC settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6558747
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65587472019-06-13 Study protocol: a mixed-methods study of women’s healthcare in the safety net after Affordable Care Act implementation – EVERYWOMAN Cottrell, Erika Darney, Blair G. Marino, Miguel Templeton, Anna Rose Jacob, Lorie Hoopes, Megan Rodriguez, Maria Hatch, Brigit Health Res Policy Syst Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Evidence-based reproductive care reduces morbidity and mortality for women and their children, decreases health disparities and saves money. Community health centres (CHCs) are a key point of access to reproductive and primary care services for women who are publicly insured, uninsured or unable to pay for care. Women of reproductive age (15–44 years) comprise just of a quarter (26%) of the total CHC patient population, with higher than average proportions of women of colour, women with lower income and educational status and social challenges (e.g. housing). Such factors are associated with poorer reproductive health outcomes across contraceptive, preventive and pregnancy-related services. The Affordable Care Act (ACA) prioritised reproductive health as an essential component of women’s preventive services to counter these barriers and increase women’s access to care. In 2012, the United States Supreme Court ruled ACA implementation through Medicaid expansion as optional, creating a natural experiment to measure the ACA’s impact on women’s reproductive care delivery and health outcomes. METHODS: This paper describes a 5-year, mixed-methods study comparing women’s contraceptive, preventive, prenatal and postpartum care before and after ACA implementation and between Medicaid expansion and non-expansion states. Quantitative assessment will leverage electronic health record data from the ADVANCE Clinical Research Network, a network of over 130 CHCs in 24 states, to describe care and identify patient, practice and state-level factors associated with provision of recommended evidence-based care. Qualitative assessment will include patient, provider and practice level interviews to understand perceptions and utilisation of reproductive healthcare in CHC settings. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this will be the first study using patient level electronic health record data from multiple states to assess the impact of ACA implementation in conjunction with other practice and policy level factors such as Title X funding or 1115 Medicaid waivers. Findings will be relevant to policy and practice, informing efforts to enhance the provision of timely, evidence-based reproductive care, improve health outcomes and reduce disparities among women. Patient, provider and practice-level interviews will serve to contextualise our findings and develop subsequent studies and interventions to support women’s healthcare provision in CHC settings. BioMed Central 2019-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6558747/ /pubmed/31186028 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0445-y Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Cottrell, Erika
Darney, Blair G.
Marino, Miguel
Templeton, Anna Rose
Jacob, Lorie
Hoopes, Megan
Rodriguez, Maria
Hatch, Brigit
Study protocol: a mixed-methods study of women’s healthcare in the safety net after Affordable Care Act implementation – EVERYWOMAN
title Study protocol: a mixed-methods study of women’s healthcare in the safety net after Affordable Care Act implementation – EVERYWOMAN
title_full Study protocol: a mixed-methods study of women’s healthcare in the safety net after Affordable Care Act implementation – EVERYWOMAN
title_fullStr Study protocol: a mixed-methods study of women’s healthcare in the safety net after Affordable Care Act implementation – EVERYWOMAN
title_full_unstemmed Study protocol: a mixed-methods study of women’s healthcare in the safety net after Affordable Care Act implementation – EVERYWOMAN
title_short Study protocol: a mixed-methods study of women’s healthcare in the safety net after Affordable Care Act implementation – EVERYWOMAN
title_sort study protocol: a mixed-methods study of women’s healthcare in the safety net after affordable care act implementation – everywoman
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6558747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31186028
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0445-y
work_keys_str_mv AT cottrellerika studyprotocolamixedmethodsstudyofwomenshealthcareinthesafetynetafteraffordablecareactimplementationeverywoman
AT darneyblairg studyprotocolamixedmethodsstudyofwomenshealthcareinthesafetynetafteraffordablecareactimplementationeverywoman
AT marinomiguel studyprotocolamixedmethodsstudyofwomenshealthcareinthesafetynetafteraffordablecareactimplementationeverywoman
AT templetonannarose studyprotocolamixedmethodsstudyofwomenshealthcareinthesafetynetafteraffordablecareactimplementationeverywoman
AT jacoblorie studyprotocolamixedmethodsstudyofwomenshealthcareinthesafetynetafteraffordablecareactimplementationeverywoman
AT hoopesmegan studyprotocolamixedmethodsstudyofwomenshealthcareinthesafetynetafteraffordablecareactimplementationeverywoman
AT rodriguezmaria studyprotocolamixedmethodsstudyofwomenshealthcareinthesafetynetafteraffordablecareactimplementationeverywoman
AT hatchbrigit studyprotocolamixedmethodsstudyofwomenshealthcareinthesafetynetafteraffordablecareactimplementationeverywoman