Cargando…
The Urban Liveability Index: developing a policy-relevant urban liveability composite measure and evaluating associations with transport mode choice
BACKGROUND: Designing healthy, liveable cities is a global priority. Current liveability indices are aggregated at the city-level, do not reflect spatial variation within cities, and are often not aligned to policy or health. OBJECTIVES: To combine policy-relevant liveability indicators associated w...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6558748/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31185987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12942-019-0178-8 |
_version_ | 1783425691245608960 |
---|---|
author | Higgs, Carl Badland, Hannah Simons, Koen Knibbs, Luke D. Giles-Corti, Billie |
author_facet | Higgs, Carl Badland, Hannah Simons, Koen Knibbs, Luke D. Giles-Corti, Billie |
author_sort | Higgs, Carl |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Designing healthy, liveable cities is a global priority. Current liveability indices are aggregated at the city-level, do not reflect spatial variation within cities, and are often not aligned to policy or health. OBJECTIVES: To combine policy-relevant liveability indicators associated with health into a spatial Urban Liveability Index (ULI) and examine its association with adult travel behaviours. METHODS: We developed methods to calculate spatial liveability indicators and the ULI for all residential addresses in Melbourne, Australia. Associations between the address-level ULI and adult travel behaviours from the 2012–2014 Victorian Integrated Survey of Travel and Activity (VISTA) (n = 12,323) were analysed using multilevel logistic regression. Sensitivity analyses to evaluate impact of methodological choices on distribution of liveability as assessed by the ULI and associations with travel mode choice were also conducted. RESULTS: Liveability estimates were calculated for 1,550,641 residential addresses. ULI scores were positively associated with active transport behaviour: for each unit increase in the ULI score the estimated adjusted odds ratio (OR) for: walking increased by 12% (95% Credible Interval: 9%, 15%); cycling increased by 10% (4%, 17%); public transport increased by 15% (11%, 19%); and private vehicle transport decreased by 12% (− 9%, − 15%). CONCLUSIONS: The ULI provides an evidence-informed and policy-relevant measure of urban liveability, that is significantly and approximately linearly associated with adult travel behaviours in the Melbourne context. The ULI can be used to evaluate progress towards implementing policies designed to achieve more liveable cities, identify spatial inequities, and examine relationships with health and wellbeing. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12942-019-0178-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6558748 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65587482019-06-13 The Urban Liveability Index: developing a policy-relevant urban liveability composite measure and evaluating associations with transport mode choice Higgs, Carl Badland, Hannah Simons, Koen Knibbs, Luke D. Giles-Corti, Billie Int J Health Geogr Research BACKGROUND: Designing healthy, liveable cities is a global priority. Current liveability indices are aggregated at the city-level, do not reflect spatial variation within cities, and are often not aligned to policy or health. OBJECTIVES: To combine policy-relevant liveability indicators associated with health into a spatial Urban Liveability Index (ULI) and examine its association with adult travel behaviours. METHODS: We developed methods to calculate spatial liveability indicators and the ULI for all residential addresses in Melbourne, Australia. Associations between the address-level ULI and adult travel behaviours from the 2012–2014 Victorian Integrated Survey of Travel and Activity (VISTA) (n = 12,323) were analysed using multilevel logistic regression. Sensitivity analyses to evaluate impact of methodological choices on distribution of liveability as assessed by the ULI and associations with travel mode choice were also conducted. RESULTS: Liveability estimates were calculated for 1,550,641 residential addresses. ULI scores were positively associated with active transport behaviour: for each unit increase in the ULI score the estimated adjusted odds ratio (OR) for: walking increased by 12% (95% Credible Interval: 9%, 15%); cycling increased by 10% (4%, 17%); public transport increased by 15% (11%, 19%); and private vehicle transport decreased by 12% (− 9%, − 15%). CONCLUSIONS: The ULI provides an evidence-informed and policy-relevant measure of urban liveability, that is significantly and approximately linearly associated with adult travel behaviours in the Melbourne context. The ULI can be used to evaluate progress towards implementing policies designed to achieve more liveable cities, identify spatial inequities, and examine relationships with health and wellbeing. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12942-019-0178-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6558748/ /pubmed/31185987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12942-019-0178-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Higgs, Carl Badland, Hannah Simons, Koen Knibbs, Luke D. Giles-Corti, Billie The Urban Liveability Index: developing a policy-relevant urban liveability composite measure and evaluating associations with transport mode choice |
title | The Urban Liveability Index: developing a policy-relevant urban liveability composite measure and evaluating associations with transport mode choice |
title_full | The Urban Liveability Index: developing a policy-relevant urban liveability composite measure and evaluating associations with transport mode choice |
title_fullStr | The Urban Liveability Index: developing a policy-relevant urban liveability composite measure and evaluating associations with transport mode choice |
title_full_unstemmed | The Urban Liveability Index: developing a policy-relevant urban liveability composite measure and evaluating associations with transport mode choice |
title_short | The Urban Liveability Index: developing a policy-relevant urban liveability composite measure and evaluating associations with transport mode choice |
title_sort | urban liveability index: developing a policy-relevant urban liveability composite measure and evaluating associations with transport mode choice |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6558748/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31185987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12942-019-0178-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT higgscarl theurbanliveabilityindexdevelopingapolicyrelevanturbanliveabilitycompositemeasureandevaluatingassociationswithtransportmodechoice AT badlandhannah theurbanliveabilityindexdevelopingapolicyrelevanturbanliveabilitycompositemeasureandevaluatingassociationswithtransportmodechoice AT simonskoen theurbanliveabilityindexdevelopingapolicyrelevanturbanliveabilitycompositemeasureandevaluatingassociationswithtransportmodechoice AT knibbsluked theurbanliveabilityindexdevelopingapolicyrelevanturbanliveabilitycompositemeasureandevaluatingassociationswithtransportmodechoice AT gilescortibillie theurbanliveabilityindexdevelopingapolicyrelevanturbanliveabilitycompositemeasureandevaluatingassociationswithtransportmodechoice AT higgscarl urbanliveabilityindexdevelopingapolicyrelevanturbanliveabilitycompositemeasureandevaluatingassociationswithtransportmodechoice AT badlandhannah urbanliveabilityindexdevelopingapolicyrelevanturbanliveabilitycompositemeasureandevaluatingassociationswithtransportmodechoice AT simonskoen urbanliveabilityindexdevelopingapolicyrelevanturbanliveabilitycompositemeasureandevaluatingassociationswithtransportmodechoice AT knibbsluked urbanliveabilityindexdevelopingapolicyrelevanturbanliveabilitycompositemeasureandevaluatingassociationswithtransportmodechoice AT gilescortibillie urbanliveabilityindexdevelopingapolicyrelevanturbanliveabilitycompositemeasureandevaluatingassociationswithtransportmodechoice |