Cargando…
Radiotherapy with or without androgen deprivation therapy in intermediate risk prostate cancer?
OBJECTIVE: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is beneficial for unfavorable intermediate-risk (IR) prostate cancer patients receiving curative radiotherapy (RT). However, for favorable IR patients the latest NCCN guidelines recommends RT alone. We retrospectively studied treatment patterns and outco...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6558831/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31182119 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-019-1298-9 |
_version_ | 1783425711496757248 |
---|---|
author | Amit, Uri Lawrence, Yaacov R. Weiss, Ilana Symon, Zvi |
author_facet | Amit, Uri Lawrence, Yaacov R. Weiss, Ilana Symon, Zvi |
author_sort | Amit, Uri |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is beneficial for unfavorable intermediate-risk (IR) prostate cancer patients receiving curative radiotherapy (RT). However, for favorable IR patients the latest NCCN guidelines recommends RT alone. We retrospectively studied treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with IR prostate cancer in our institution over the past two decades. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundred seventy-three IR prostate cancer patients treated with definitive RT between 5/2002–5/2016 were identified in an institutional review board approved database. All patients received conformal RT to the prostate while the vast majority did not receive nodal radiation. ADT was commenced 2 months prior to RT and was continued for 4 months after RT. RESULTS: Compared to RT alone, patients receiving combined RT+ ADT had more positive biopsy cores, higher pre-radiation PSA, more IR factors, and were more likely to receive pelvic lymph node radiation. However, there were no differences in failure either biochemical, local or distal, nor on survival between the favorable RT alone and the unfavorable RT+ ADT cohorts, suggesting a beneficial role for ADT. On multivariate analysis, patients 70 years or younger receiving RT alone were at increased risk for biochemical failure during a 6-year follow-up (HR 3.06, P = 0.025). Biochemical relapse free survival in patients ≤70 years who received RT alone was 82.1% vs 94.0% for RT + ADT (P = 0.030). There was no difference for combined treatment modality in patients > 70 years (P = 0.87). CONCLUSIONS: Men 70 years or younger with favorable IR prostate cancer treated with RT alone to 78 Gy are at increased risk of biochemical failure. Short term ADT should be considered in this cohort of men. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13014-019-1298-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6558831 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65588312019-06-13 Radiotherapy with or without androgen deprivation therapy in intermediate risk prostate cancer? Amit, Uri Lawrence, Yaacov R. Weiss, Ilana Symon, Zvi Radiat Oncol Research OBJECTIVE: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is beneficial for unfavorable intermediate-risk (IR) prostate cancer patients receiving curative radiotherapy (RT). However, for favorable IR patients the latest NCCN guidelines recommends RT alone. We retrospectively studied treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with IR prostate cancer in our institution over the past two decades. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundred seventy-three IR prostate cancer patients treated with definitive RT between 5/2002–5/2016 were identified in an institutional review board approved database. All patients received conformal RT to the prostate while the vast majority did not receive nodal radiation. ADT was commenced 2 months prior to RT and was continued for 4 months after RT. RESULTS: Compared to RT alone, patients receiving combined RT+ ADT had more positive biopsy cores, higher pre-radiation PSA, more IR factors, and were more likely to receive pelvic lymph node radiation. However, there were no differences in failure either biochemical, local or distal, nor on survival between the favorable RT alone and the unfavorable RT+ ADT cohorts, suggesting a beneficial role for ADT. On multivariate analysis, patients 70 years or younger receiving RT alone were at increased risk for biochemical failure during a 6-year follow-up (HR 3.06, P = 0.025). Biochemical relapse free survival in patients ≤70 years who received RT alone was 82.1% vs 94.0% for RT + ADT (P = 0.030). There was no difference for combined treatment modality in patients > 70 years (P = 0.87). CONCLUSIONS: Men 70 years or younger with favorable IR prostate cancer treated with RT alone to 78 Gy are at increased risk of biochemical failure. Short term ADT should be considered in this cohort of men. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13014-019-1298-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6558831/ /pubmed/31182119 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-019-1298-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Amit, Uri Lawrence, Yaacov R. Weiss, Ilana Symon, Zvi Radiotherapy with or without androgen deprivation therapy in intermediate risk prostate cancer? |
title | Radiotherapy with or without androgen deprivation therapy in intermediate risk prostate cancer? |
title_full | Radiotherapy with or without androgen deprivation therapy in intermediate risk prostate cancer? |
title_fullStr | Radiotherapy with or without androgen deprivation therapy in intermediate risk prostate cancer? |
title_full_unstemmed | Radiotherapy with or without androgen deprivation therapy in intermediate risk prostate cancer? |
title_short | Radiotherapy with or without androgen deprivation therapy in intermediate risk prostate cancer? |
title_sort | radiotherapy with or without androgen deprivation therapy in intermediate risk prostate cancer? |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6558831/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31182119 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-019-1298-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT amituri radiotherapywithorwithoutandrogendeprivationtherapyinintermediateriskprostatecancer AT lawrenceyaacovr radiotherapywithorwithoutandrogendeprivationtherapyinintermediateriskprostatecancer AT weissilana radiotherapywithorwithoutandrogendeprivationtherapyinintermediateriskprostatecancer AT symonzvi radiotherapywithorwithoutandrogendeprivationtherapyinintermediateriskprostatecancer |