Cargando…

Microwave ablation compared with hepatic resection for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma and liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Hepatic resection (HR) is the gold standard liver cancer treatment, but few patients are eligible due to comorbidities or tumor location. Microwave ablation (MWA) is an important complementary liver cancer treatment to HR. This systematic review compared MWA with HR for liver cancer trea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Glassberg, Mrudula B., Ghosh, Sudip, Clymer, Jeffrey W., Wright, George W. J., Ferko, Nicole, Amaral, Joseph F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6558848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31182102
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-019-1632-6
_version_ 1783425715376488448
author Glassberg, Mrudula B.
Ghosh, Sudip
Clymer, Jeffrey W.
Wright, George W. J.
Ferko, Nicole
Amaral, Joseph F.
author_facet Glassberg, Mrudula B.
Ghosh, Sudip
Clymer, Jeffrey W.
Wright, George W. J.
Ferko, Nicole
Amaral, Joseph F.
author_sort Glassberg, Mrudula B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hepatic resection (HR) is the gold standard liver cancer treatment, but few patients are eligible due to comorbidities or tumor location. Microwave ablation (MWA) is an important complementary liver cancer treatment to HR. This systematic review compared MWA with HR for liver cancer treatment. METHODS: A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL was conducted for randomized and observational studies published from 2006 onwards. The primary outcome was local tumor recurrence (LTR), and a random effects model was used for meta-analyses. RESULTS: Of the 1845 studies identified, 1 randomized and 15 observational studies met the inclusion criteria. LTR was significantly increased with MWA versus HR (risk ratio (RR) = 2.49; P = 0.016). In secondary measures, HR provided significantly higher 3- and 5-year overall survival (RR = 0.94; P = 0.03 and RR = 0.88; P = 0.01, respectively) and 3-year disease-free survival (RR = 0.78; P = 0.009). MWA exhibited significantly shorter length of stay (weighted mean difference (WMD) = − 6.16 days; P < 0.001) and operative time (WMD = − 58.69 min; P < 0.001), less intraoperative blood loss (WMD = − 189.09 mL; P = 0.006), and fewer complications than HR (RR = 0.31; P < 0.001). When MWA was combined with HR and compared with either modality alone, complications and blood loss were significantly lower with the combination treatment; however, there were no differences in other outcomes. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were generally aligned with the main results. CONCLUSIONS: MWA can be an effective and safe alternative to HR in patients/tumors that are not amenable to resection. More randomized and economic studies should be performed that compare the two treatments, especially to determine the target population that benefits most from MWA. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12957-019-1632-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6558848
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65588482019-06-13 Microwave ablation compared with hepatic resection for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma and liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis Glassberg, Mrudula B. Ghosh, Sudip Clymer, Jeffrey W. Wright, George W. J. Ferko, Nicole Amaral, Joseph F. World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Hepatic resection (HR) is the gold standard liver cancer treatment, but few patients are eligible due to comorbidities or tumor location. Microwave ablation (MWA) is an important complementary liver cancer treatment to HR. This systematic review compared MWA with HR for liver cancer treatment. METHODS: A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL was conducted for randomized and observational studies published from 2006 onwards. The primary outcome was local tumor recurrence (LTR), and a random effects model was used for meta-analyses. RESULTS: Of the 1845 studies identified, 1 randomized and 15 observational studies met the inclusion criteria. LTR was significantly increased with MWA versus HR (risk ratio (RR) = 2.49; P = 0.016). In secondary measures, HR provided significantly higher 3- and 5-year overall survival (RR = 0.94; P = 0.03 and RR = 0.88; P = 0.01, respectively) and 3-year disease-free survival (RR = 0.78; P = 0.009). MWA exhibited significantly shorter length of stay (weighted mean difference (WMD) = − 6.16 days; P < 0.001) and operative time (WMD = − 58.69 min; P < 0.001), less intraoperative blood loss (WMD = − 189.09 mL; P = 0.006), and fewer complications than HR (RR = 0.31; P < 0.001). When MWA was combined with HR and compared with either modality alone, complications and blood loss were significantly lower with the combination treatment; however, there were no differences in other outcomes. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were generally aligned with the main results. CONCLUSIONS: MWA can be an effective and safe alternative to HR in patients/tumors that are not amenable to resection. More randomized and economic studies should be performed that compare the two treatments, especially to determine the target population that benefits most from MWA. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12957-019-1632-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6558848/ /pubmed/31182102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-019-1632-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Glassberg, Mrudula B.
Ghosh, Sudip
Clymer, Jeffrey W.
Wright, George W. J.
Ferko, Nicole
Amaral, Joseph F.
Microwave ablation compared with hepatic resection for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma and liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Microwave ablation compared with hepatic resection for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma and liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Microwave ablation compared with hepatic resection for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma and liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Microwave ablation compared with hepatic resection for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma and liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Microwave ablation compared with hepatic resection for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma and liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Microwave ablation compared with hepatic resection for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma and liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort microwave ablation compared with hepatic resection for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma and liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6558848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31182102
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-019-1632-6
work_keys_str_mv AT glassbergmrudulab microwaveablationcomparedwithhepaticresectionforthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinomaandlivermetastasesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ghoshsudip microwaveablationcomparedwithhepaticresectionforthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinomaandlivermetastasesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT clymerjeffreyw microwaveablationcomparedwithhepaticresectionforthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinomaandlivermetastasesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wrightgeorgewj microwaveablationcomparedwithhepaticresectionforthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinomaandlivermetastasesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ferkonicole microwaveablationcomparedwithhepaticresectionforthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinomaandlivermetastasesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT amaraljosephf microwaveablationcomparedwithhepaticresectionforthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinomaandlivermetastasesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis