Cargando…
The Dental Hygienists in Sweden and Portugal: A Comparative Study
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to identify the dental hygienists (DHs)’ working areas and compare these findings between Sweden and Portugal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A web-based questionnaire was sent by E-mail to all 2943 members of the Swedish DH Association and 381 members o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6559047/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31198704 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_1_19 |
Sumario: | AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to identify the dental hygienists (DHs)’ working areas and compare these findings between Sweden and Portugal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A web-based questionnaire was sent by E-mail to all 2943 members of the Swedish DH Association and 381 members of the Portuguese DH Association. The questionnaire contained questions about; number of years of work, which patient groups they worked with, if they had got sufficient knowledge from the education and what different tasks they worked with. Independent sample t-test, relative risk, and logistic regression analysis were used as statistical methods. RESULTS: The response rate for Sweden was 31% (n = 923) and the corresponding figure for Portugal was 53.5% (n = 204). The most common tasks for the DHs, in both countries, were to diagnose and treat patients with periodontitis and to diagnose and perform caries prevention. In Portugal, 86.5% worked with orthodontic patients compared to 32.3% in Sweden (P = 0.001). The logistic regression analysis showed that there was a 25% (P = 0.02) higher probability that Swedish DHs took more X-rays and 38% (P = 0.042) probability that they had more communications skills compared to the Portuguese DHs. CONCLUSION: The DH profession in Sweden and Portugal was overall quite similar. Despite a few local differences, both the academic education and scope of practice corresponded well between the countries. The few discrepancies could be explained by differences in legislations in each country. |
---|