Cargando…

A randomized controlled trial comparing the radiographic evaluation of crestal bone resorption in single implant versus two implant–retained overdentures

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare radiographically the amount of crestal bone resorption during healing and loading period in single implant versus two implant–retained mandibular overdentures in totally edentulous patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 20 edentulous patien...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kant, Barun, Ranjan, Madhu, Kumar, Arunoday, Mukherjee, Bodhisatta, Pandey, Souvir Mohan, Agarwal, Meetu, Passi, Deepak
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6559095/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31198720
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_58_19
_version_ 1783425766906658816
author Kant, Barun
Ranjan, Madhu
Kumar, Arunoday
Mukherjee, Bodhisatta
Pandey, Souvir Mohan
Agarwal, Meetu
Passi, Deepak
author_facet Kant, Barun
Ranjan, Madhu
Kumar, Arunoday
Mukherjee, Bodhisatta
Pandey, Souvir Mohan
Agarwal, Meetu
Passi, Deepak
author_sort Kant, Barun
collection PubMed
description AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare radiographically the amount of crestal bone resorption during healing and loading period in single implant versus two implant–retained mandibular overdentures in totally edentulous patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 20 edentulous patients (12 male and 8 female) with age range of 58.6 years were included in this clinical trial which was completed in four phases (clinical and radiographic diagnosis, surgical phase, implant loading phase, and bone level measurement phase). The eligible patients were randomly allocated in two equivalent groups of 10 participants each per group. The allocation was in 1:1 ratio via randomized chit method. Group I included the case group, that is, single implant, and Group II included the control group, that is, two implants located in mandible. A total of 30 implants were placed in Group I and 20 implants in Group II. Digital intraoral peri-apical radiographs (RVG 5100) were used for measuring the bone level immediately after implant surgery, 1 month, 3 months, 4 months, and 6 months. RESULT: This study showed that there was a mean crestal bone loss of 0.7 mm between the tip of the implant and alveolar crest at the end of 6 months after implant placement in single implant Group I while 0.67 mm in case of Group II two-implant-retained mandibular overdentures. The percentage of crestal bone loss after 6 months follow-up was 6.45% in Group I which was statistically insignificant compared with Group II where 6.25% of bone loss was recorded. CONCLUSION: Single implant–retained mandibular overdentures could be used as another alternative treatment option for completely edentulous elderly patients with severely resorbed ridges and financially and systemically compromised conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6559095
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65590952019-06-13 A randomized controlled trial comparing the radiographic evaluation of crestal bone resorption in single implant versus two implant–retained overdentures Kant, Barun Ranjan, Madhu Kumar, Arunoday Mukherjee, Bodhisatta Pandey, Souvir Mohan Agarwal, Meetu Passi, Deepak J Family Med Prim Care Original Article AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare radiographically the amount of crestal bone resorption during healing and loading period in single implant versus two implant–retained mandibular overdentures in totally edentulous patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 20 edentulous patients (12 male and 8 female) with age range of 58.6 years were included in this clinical trial which was completed in four phases (clinical and radiographic diagnosis, surgical phase, implant loading phase, and bone level measurement phase). The eligible patients were randomly allocated in two equivalent groups of 10 participants each per group. The allocation was in 1:1 ratio via randomized chit method. Group I included the case group, that is, single implant, and Group II included the control group, that is, two implants located in mandible. A total of 30 implants were placed in Group I and 20 implants in Group II. Digital intraoral peri-apical radiographs (RVG 5100) were used for measuring the bone level immediately after implant surgery, 1 month, 3 months, 4 months, and 6 months. RESULT: This study showed that there was a mean crestal bone loss of 0.7 mm between the tip of the implant and alveolar crest at the end of 6 months after implant placement in single implant Group I while 0.67 mm in case of Group II two-implant-retained mandibular overdentures. The percentage of crestal bone loss after 6 months follow-up was 6.45% in Group I which was statistically insignificant compared with Group II where 6.25% of bone loss was recorded. CONCLUSION: Single implant–retained mandibular overdentures could be used as another alternative treatment option for completely edentulous elderly patients with severely resorbed ridges and financially and systemically compromised conditions. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6559095/ /pubmed/31198720 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_58_19 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kant, Barun
Ranjan, Madhu
Kumar, Arunoday
Mukherjee, Bodhisatta
Pandey, Souvir Mohan
Agarwal, Meetu
Passi, Deepak
A randomized controlled trial comparing the radiographic evaluation of crestal bone resorption in single implant versus two implant–retained overdentures
title A randomized controlled trial comparing the radiographic evaluation of crestal bone resorption in single implant versus two implant–retained overdentures
title_full A randomized controlled trial comparing the radiographic evaluation of crestal bone resorption in single implant versus two implant–retained overdentures
title_fullStr A randomized controlled trial comparing the radiographic evaluation of crestal bone resorption in single implant versus two implant–retained overdentures
title_full_unstemmed A randomized controlled trial comparing the radiographic evaluation of crestal bone resorption in single implant versus two implant–retained overdentures
title_short A randomized controlled trial comparing the radiographic evaluation of crestal bone resorption in single implant versus two implant–retained overdentures
title_sort randomized controlled trial comparing the radiographic evaluation of crestal bone resorption in single implant versus two implant–retained overdentures
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6559095/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31198720
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_58_19
work_keys_str_mv AT kantbarun arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheradiographicevaluationofcrestalboneresorptioninsingleimplantversustwoimplantretainedoverdentures
AT ranjanmadhu arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheradiographicevaluationofcrestalboneresorptioninsingleimplantversustwoimplantretainedoverdentures
AT kumararunoday arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheradiographicevaluationofcrestalboneresorptioninsingleimplantversustwoimplantretainedoverdentures
AT mukherjeebodhisatta arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheradiographicevaluationofcrestalboneresorptioninsingleimplantversustwoimplantretainedoverdentures
AT pandeysouvirmohan arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheradiographicevaluationofcrestalboneresorptioninsingleimplantversustwoimplantretainedoverdentures
AT agarwalmeetu arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheradiographicevaluationofcrestalboneresorptioninsingleimplantversustwoimplantretainedoverdentures
AT passideepak arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheradiographicevaluationofcrestalboneresorptioninsingleimplantversustwoimplantretainedoverdentures
AT kantbarun randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheradiographicevaluationofcrestalboneresorptioninsingleimplantversustwoimplantretainedoverdentures
AT ranjanmadhu randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheradiographicevaluationofcrestalboneresorptioninsingleimplantversustwoimplantretainedoverdentures
AT kumararunoday randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheradiographicevaluationofcrestalboneresorptioninsingleimplantversustwoimplantretainedoverdentures
AT mukherjeebodhisatta randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheradiographicevaluationofcrestalboneresorptioninsingleimplantversustwoimplantretainedoverdentures
AT pandeysouvirmohan randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheradiographicevaluationofcrestalboneresorptioninsingleimplantversustwoimplantretainedoverdentures
AT agarwalmeetu randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheradiographicevaluationofcrestalboneresorptioninsingleimplantversustwoimplantretainedoverdentures
AT passideepak randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheradiographicevaluationofcrestalboneresorptioninsingleimplantversustwoimplantretainedoverdentures