Cargando…

Value-based requirements engineering: method and experience

‘Socio-political’ issues, such as emotions, values and people’s feelings, are often cited as problems in the RE process. A method is described for analysing such issues. The method consists of a taxonomy of stakeholders’ values, motivations and emotions (VME), with process guidance for eliciting and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thew, Sarah, Sutcliffe, Alistair
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer London 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6559156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31258257
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00766-017-0273-y
_version_ 1783425781611888640
author Thew, Sarah
Sutcliffe, Alistair
author_facet Thew, Sarah
Sutcliffe, Alistair
author_sort Thew, Sarah
collection PubMed
description ‘Socio-political’ issues, such as emotions, values and people’s feelings, are often cited as problems in the RE process. A method is described for analysing such issues. The method consists of a taxonomy of stakeholders’ values, motivations and emotions (VME), with process guidance for eliciting and analysing these issues for the RE process and design implications. Values are personal attitudes or long-term beliefs which may influence stakeholder functional and non-functional requirements. Motivations are psychological constructs related to personality traits which may be viewed as stakeholders’ long-term goals in RE. Emotions are cues to stakeholders’ reactions arising from value/motivation conflicts. The method is supported by a website which illustrates the taxonomy with explanations and scenarios describing problems arising from value conflicts, and from poor understanding of stakeholder values. Two method validation studies were undertaken: first, an evaluation of the website and method by novices and RE experts; and second, case study applications of RE value analysis in real-world industrial practice. The method was used by all practitioners, although in different ways, some used it to create an agenda of issues for analysis while others employed the VMEs to interpret stakeholders’ views and manage stakeholder negotiations. The validation studies provide evidence for the acceptability of the method for industrial practitioners, illustrating how value-related problems are identified and analysed effectively by the method. The utility of analysing VMEs is compared to other ‘socio-political issues’-oriented methods in RE and methods which focus on monetized values in product requirements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6559156
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer London
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65591562019-06-26 Value-based requirements engineering: method and experience Thew, Sarah Sutcliffe, Alistair Requir Eng Original Article ‘Socio-political’ issues, such as emotions, values and people’s feelings, are often cited as problems in the RE process. A method is described for analysing such issues. The method consists of a taxonomy of stakeholders’ values, motivations and emotions (VME), with process guidance for eliciting and analysing these issues for the RE process and design implications. Values are personal attitudes or long-term beliefs which may influence stakeholder functional and non-functional requirements. Motivations are psychological constructs related to personality traits which may be viewed as stakeholders’ long-term goals in RE. Emotions are cues to stakeholders’ reactions arising from value/motivation conflicts. The method is supported by a website which illustrates the taxonomy with explanations and scenarios describing problems arising from value conflicts, and from poor understanding of stakeholder values. Two method validation studies were undertaken: first, an evaluation of the website and method by novices and RE experts; and second, case study applications of RE value analysis in real-world industrial practice. The method was used by all practitioners, although in different ways, some used it to create an agenda of issues for analysis while others employed the VMEs to interpret stakeholders’ views and manage stakeholder negotiations. The validation studies provide evidence for the acceptability of the method for industrial practitioners, illustrating how value-related problems are identified and analysed effectively by the method. The utility of analysing VMEs is compared to other ‘socio-political issues’-oriented methods in RE and methods which focus on monetized values in product requirements. Springer London 2017-06-06 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6559156/ /pubmed/31258257 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00766-017-0273-y Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Thew, Sarah
Sutcliffe, Alistair
Value-based requirements engineering: method and experience
title Value-based requirements engineering: method and experience
title_full Value-based requirements engineering: method and experience
title_fullStr Value-based requirements engineering: method and experience
title_full_unstemmed Value-based requirements engineering: method and experience
title_short Value-based requirements engineering: method and experience
title_sort value-based requirements engineering: method and experience
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6559156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31258257
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00766-017-0273-y
work_keys_str_mv AT thewsarah valuebasedrequirementsengineeringmethodandexperience
AT sutcliffealistair valuebasedrequirementsengineeringmethodandexperience