Cargando…

Detection of Fossil and Biogenic Methane at Regional Scales Using Atmospheric Radiocarbon

Regional emissions of methane and their attribution to a variety of sources presently have large uncertainties. Measurements of radiocarbon ((14)C) in methane (CH(4)) may provide a method for identifying regional CH(4) emissions from fossil versus biogenic sources because adding (14)C‐free fossil ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Graven, H., Hocking, T., Zazzeri, G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6559284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31218239
http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2018EF001064
_version_ 1783425803928731648
author Graven, H.
Hocking, T.
Zazzeri, G.
author_facet Graven, H.
Hocking, T.
Zazzeri, G.
author_sort Graven, H.
collection PubMed
description Regional emissions of methane and their attribution to a variety of sources presently have large uncertainties. Measurements of radiocarbon ((14)C) in methane (CH(4)) may provide a method for identifying regional CH(4) emissions from fossil versus biogenic sources because adding (14)C‐free fossil carbon reduces the (14)C/C ratio (Δ(14)CH(4)) in atmospheric CH(4) much more than biogenic carbon does. We describe an approach for estimating fossil and biogenic CH(4) at regional scales using atmospheric Δ(14)CH(4) observations. As a case study to demonstrate expected Δ(14)CH(4) and Δ(14)CH(4)‐CH(4) relationships, we simulate and compare Δ(14)CH(4) at a network of sites in California using two gridded CH(4) emissions estimates (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research, EDGAR, and Gridded Environmental Protection Agency, GEPA) and the CarbonTracker‐Lagrange model for 2014, and for 2030 under business‐as‐usual and mitigation scenarios. The fossil fraction of CH(4) (F) is closely linked with the simulated Δ(14)CH(4)‐CH(4) slope and differences of 2–21% in median F are found for EDGAR versus GEPA in 2014, and 7–10% for business‐as‐usual and mitigation scenarios in 2030. Differences of 10% in F for >200 ppb of added CH(4) produce differences of >10‰ in Δ(14)CH(4), which are likely detectable from regular observations. Nuclear power plant (14)CH(4) emissions generally have small simulated median influences on Δ(14)CH(4) (0–7‰), but under certain atmospheric conditions they can be much stronger (>30‰) suggesting they must be considered in applications of Δ(14)CH(4) in California. This study suggests that atmospheric Δ(14)CH(4) measurements could provide powerful constraints on regional CH(4) emissions, complementary to other monitoring techniques.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6559284
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65592842019-06-17 Detection of Fossil and Biogenic Methane at Regional Scales Using Atmospheric Radiocarbon Graven, H. Hocking, T. Zazzeri, G. Earths Future Research Articles Regional emissions of methane and their attribution to a variety of sources presently have large uncertainties. Measurements of radiocarbon ((14)C) in methane (CH(4)) may provide a method for identifying regional CH(4) emissions from fossil versus biogenic sources because adding (14)C‐free fossil carbon reduces the (14)C/C ratio (Δ(14)CH(4)) in atmospheric CH(4) much more than biogenic carbon does. We describe an approach for estimating fossil and biogenic CH(4) at regional scales using atmospheric Δ(14)CH(4) observations. As a case study to demonstrate expected Δ(14)CH(4) and Δ(14)CH(4)‐CH(4) relationships, we simulate and compare Δ(14)CH(4) at a network of sites in California using two gridded CH(4) emissions estimates (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research, EDGAR, and Gridded Environmental Protection Agency, GEPA) and the CarbonTracker‐Lagrange model for 2014, and for 2030 under business‐as‐usual and mitigation scenarios. The fossil fraction of CH(4) (F) is closely linked with the simulated Δ(14)CH(4)‐CH(4) slope and differences of 2–21% in median F are found for EDGAR versus GEPA in 2014, and 7–10% for business‐as‐usual and mitigation scenarios in 2030. Differences of 10% in F for >200 ppb of added CH(4) produce differences of >10‰ in Δ(14)CH(4), which are likely detectable from regular observations. Nuclear power plant (14)CH(4) emissions generally have small simulated median influences on Δ(14)CH(4) (0–7‰), but under certain atmospheric conditions they can be much stronger (>30‰) suggesting they must be considered in applications of Δ(14)CH(4) in California. This study suggests that atmospheric Δ(14)CH(4) measurements could provide powerful constraints on regional CH(4) emissions, complementary to other monitoring techniques. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-03-18 2019-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6559284/ /pubmed/31218239 http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2018EF001064 Text en ©2019. The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Graven, H.
Hocking, T.
Zazzeri, G.
Detection of Fossil and Biogenic Methane at Regional Scales Using Atmospheric Radiocarbon
title Detection of Fossil and Biogenic Methane at Regional Scales Using Atmospheric Radiocarbon
title_full Detection of Fossil and Biogenic Methane at Regional Scales Using Atmospheric Radiocarbon
title_fullStr Detection of Fossil and Biogenic Methane at Regional Scales Using Atmospheric Radiocarbon
title_full_unstemmed Detection of Fossil and Biogenic Methane at Regional Scales Using Atmospheric Radiocarbon
title_short Detection of Fossil and Biogenic Methane at Regional Scales Using Atmospheric Radiocarbon
title_sort detection of fossil and biogenic methane at regional scales using atmospheric radiocarbon
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6559284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31218239
http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2018EF001064
work_keys_str_mv AT gravenh detectionoffossilandbiogenicmethaneatregionalscalesusingatmosphericradiocarbon
AT hockingt detectionoffossilandbiogenicmethaneatregionalscalesusingatmosphericradiocarbon
AT zazzerig detectionoffossilandbiogenicmethaneatregionalscalesusingatmosphericradiocarbon