Cargando…

Specialist follow-up contraceptive support after abortion—Impact on effective contraceptive use at six months and subsequent abortions: A randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of specialist contraceptive support after abortion on effective contraceptive use at six months and subsequent abortions within two years. METHODS: Multicentre randomised controlled trial among women undergoing induced abortion in three London boroughs. Allocation wa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kumar, Usha, Pollard, Louise, Campbell, Lucy, Yurdakul, Selin, Calvete, Clara Cantalapiedra, Coker, Bola, Chen, Tao, Douiri, Abdel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6559659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31185058
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217902
_version_ 1783425839490138112
author Kumar, Usha
Pollard, Louise
Campbell, Lucy
Yurdakul, Selin
Calvete, Clara Cantalapiedra
Coker, Bola
Chen, Tao
Douiri, Abdel
author_facet Kumar, Usha
Pollard, Louise
Campbell, Lucy
Yurdakul, Selin
Calvete, Clara Cantalapiedra
Coker, Bola
Chen, Tao
Douiri, Abdel
author_sort Kumar, Usha
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of specialist contraceptive support after abortion on effective contraceptive use at six months and subsequent abortions within two years. METHODS: Multicentre randomised controlled trial among women undergoing induced abortion in three London boroughs. Allocation was through electronically concealed stratified randomisation by centre, blinding clinicians and participants to arm allocation until interventions. Control group received standard care, comprising advice to follow up with their general practitioner or contraceptive clinic as needed. Intervention group additionally received specialist contraceptive support via telephone or face-to-face consultation at 2–4 weeks and 3 months post-abortion. Primary outcome was rate of effective contraceptive use at six months post-abortion. Secondary outcomes were subsequent abortions within two years. RESULTS: 569 women were recruited between October 2011 and February 2013, randomised to intervention (282) and control (287) groups; 290 (142 intervention, 148 control) were available for primary outcome analysis. Intention-to-treat analysis showed no significant difference between the two groups in effective contraceptive use after abortion (62%, vs 54%, p = 0·172), long-acting contraceptive use (42% versus 32%, p = 0·084), and subsequent abortion (similar rates, at 1 year: 10%, p = 0·895, between 1–2 years: 6%, p = 0·944). Per-protocol analysis showed those who received the complete intervention package were significantly more likely to use effective contraception (67% versus 54%, p = 0·048), in particular long-acting contraception (49% versus 32%, p = 0·010) and showed a non-significant reduction in subsequent abortions within 2 years (at 1 year: 5% versus 10%, p = 0·098; and between 1–2 years: 3% versus 6%, p = 0·164, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Structured specialist support post-abortion did not result in significant use of effective contraception at six months or reduction in subsequent abortions within two years. Participants engaging with the intervention showed positive effect on effective contraception at six months post-abortion. The potential benefit of such intervention may become evident through further studies with increased patient participation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6559659
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65596592019-06-17 Specialist follow-up contraceptive support after abortion—Impact on effective contraceptive use at six months and subsequent abortions: A randomised controlled trial Kumar, Usha Pollard, Louise Campbell, Lucy Yurdakul, Selin Calvete, Clara Cantalapiedra Coker, Bola Chen, Tao Douiri, Abdel PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of specialist contraceptive support after abortion on effective contraceptive use at six months and subsequent abortions within two years. METHODS: Multicentre randomised controlled trial among women undergoing induced abortion in three London boroughs. Allocation was through electronically concealed stratified randomisation by centre, blinding clinicians and participants to arm allocation until interventions. Control group received standard care, comprising advice to follow up with their general practitioner or contraceptive clinic as needed. Intervention group additionally received specialist contraceptive support via telephone or face-to-face consultation at 2–4 weeks and 3 months post-abortion. Primary outcome was rate of effective contraceptive use at six months post-abortion. Secondary outcomes were subsequent abortions within two years. RESULTS: 569 women were recruited between October 2011 and February 2013, randomised to intervention (282) and control (287) groups; 290 (142 intervention, 148 control) were available for primary outcome analysis. Intention-to-treat analysis showed no significant difference between the two groups in effective contraceptive use after abortion (62%, vs 54%, p = 0·172), long-acting contraceptive use (42% versus 32%, p = 0·084), and subsequent abortion (similar rates, at 1 year: 10%, p = 0·895, between 1–2 years: 6%, p = 0·944). Per-protocol analysis showed those who received the complete intervention package were significantly more likely to use effective contraception (67% versus 54%, p = 0·048), in particular long-acting contraception (49% versus 32%, p = 0·010) and showed a non-significant reduction in subsequent abortions within 2 years (at 1 year: 5% versus 10%, p = 0·098; and between 1–2 years: 3% versus 6%, p = 0·164, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Structured specialist support post-abortion did not result in significant use of effective contraception at six months or reduction in subsequent abortions within two years. Participants engaging with the intervention showed positive effect on effective contraception at six months post-abortion. The potential benefit of such intervention may become evident through further studies with increased patient participation. Public Library of Science 2019-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6559659/ /pubmed/31185058 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217902 Text en © 2019 Kumar et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kumar, Usha
Pollard, Louise
Campbell, Lucy
Yurdakul, Selin
Calvete, Clara Cantalapiedra
Coker, Bola
Chen, Tao
Douiri, Abdel
Specialist follow-up contraceptive support after abortion—Impact on effective contraceptive use at six months and subsequent abortions: A randomised controlled trial
title Specialist follow-up contraceptive support after abortion—Impact on effective contraceptive use at six months and subsequent abortions: A randomised controlled trial
title_full Specialist follow-up contraceptive support after abortion—Impact on effective contraceptive use at six months and subsequent abortions: A randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Specialist follow-up contraceptive support after abortion—Impact on effective contraceptive use at six months and subsequent abortions: A randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Specialist follow-up contraceptive support after abortion—Impact on effective contraceptive use at six months and subsequent abortions: A randomised controlled trial
title_short Specialist follow-up contraceptive support after abortion—Impact on effective contraceptive use at six months and subsequent abortions: A randomised controlled trial
title_sort specialist follow-up contraceptive support after abortion—impact on effective contraceptive use at six months and subsequent abortions: a randomised controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6559659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31185058
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217902
work_keys_str_mv AT kumarusha specialistfollowupcontraceptivesupportafterabortionimpactoneffectivecontraceptiveuseatsixmonthsandsubsequentabortionsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT pollardlouise specialistfollowupcontraceptivesupportafterabortionimpactoneffectivecontraceptiveuseatsixmonthsandsubsequentabortionsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT campbelllucy specialistfollowupcontraceptivesupportafterabortionimpactoneffectivecontraceptiveuseatsixmonthsandsubsequentabortionsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT yurdakulselin specialistfollowupcontraceptivesupportafterabortionimpactoneffectivecontraceptiveuseatsixmonthsandsubsequentabortionsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT calveteclaracantalapiedra specialistfollowupcontraceptivesupportafterabortionimpactoneffectivecontraceptiveuseatsixmonthsandsubsequentabortionsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT cokerbola specialistfollowupcontraceptivesupportafterabortionimpactoneffectivecontraceptiveuseatsixmonthsandsubsequentabortionsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT chentao specialistfollowupcontraceptivesupportafterabortionimpactoneffectivecontraceptiveuseatsixmonthsandsubsequentabortionsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT douiriabdel specialistfollowupcontraceptivesupportafterabortionimpactoneffectivecontraceptiveuseatsixmonthsandsubsequentabortionsarandomisedcontrolledtrial