Cargando…
A comparative finite element analysis of maxillary expansion with and without midpalatal suture viscoelasticity using a representative skeletal geometry
The goal of this investigation was to adapt and incorporate a nonlinear viscoelastic material model representative of the midpalatal suture’s viscoelastic nature into finite element analysis simulations of maxillary expansion treatment. Step-wise displacements were applied to a partial skull geometr...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6560028/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31186512 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44959-w |
_version_ | 1783425886429642752 |
---|---|
author | Fuhrer, R. S. Romanyk, D. L. Carey, J. P. |
author_facet | Fuhrer, R. S. Romanyk, D. L. Carey, J. P. |
author_sort | Fuhrer, R. S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The goal of this investigation was to adapt and incorporate a nonlinear viscoelastic material model representative of the midpalatal suture’s viscoelastic nature into finite element analysis simulations of maxillary expansion treatment. Step-wise displacements were applied to a partial skull geometry to simulate treatment using an expansion screw appliance. Four simulation cases were considered for the midpalatal and intermaxillary sutures: 1. Neglecting suture tissue; 2. Linear elastic properties; 3. Viscoelastic properties; 4. A fused intermaxillary and viscoelastic midpalatal suture. Results from simulations indicated that removal of suture tissue and inclusion of viscoelastic properties resulted in the same maxillary displacement following 29 activations of 0.125 mm applied directly to the maxilla; however, assuming a fused intermaxillary suture significantly changed maxillary displacement patterns. Initial stress results within the suture complex were significantly influenced by the inclusion of suture viscoelasticity as compared to linear elastic properties. The presented study demonstrates successful incorporation of suture viscoelasticity into finite element analysis simulations of maxillary expansion treatment, and elucidates the appropriateness of various suture material property assumptions depending desired research outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6560028 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65600282019-06-19 A comparative finite element analysis of maxillary expansion with and without midpalatal suture viscoelasticity using a representative skeletal geometry Fuhrer, R. S. Romanyk, D. L. Carey, J. P. Sci Rep Article The goal of this investigation was to adapt and incorporate a nonlinear viscoelastic material model representative of the midpalatal suture’s viscoelastic nature into finite element analysis simulations of maxillary expansion treatment. Step-wise displacements were applied to a partial skull geometry to simulate treatment using an expansion screw appliance. Four simulation cases were considered for the midpalatal and intermaxillary sutures: 1. Neglecting suture tissue; 2. Linear elastic properties; 3. Viscoelastic properties; 4. A fused intermaxillary and viscoelastic midpalatal suture. Results from simulations indicated that removal of suture tissue and inclusion of viscoelastic properties resulted in the same maxillary displacement following 29 activations of 0.125 mm applied directly to the maxilla; however, assuming a fused intermaxillary suture significantly changed maxillary displacement patterns. Initial stress results within the suture complex were significantly influenced by the inclusion of suture viscoelasticity as compared to linear elastic properties. The presented study demonstrates successful incorporation of suture viscoelasticity into finite element analysis simulations of maxillary expansion treatment, and elucidates the appropriateness of various suture material property assumptions depending desired research outcomes. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6560028/ /pubmed/31186512 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44959-w Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Fuhrer, R. S. Romanyk, D. L. Carey, J. P. A comparative finite element analysis of maxillary expansion with and without midpalatal suture viscoelasticity using a representative skeletal geometry |
title | A comparative finite element analysis of maxillary expansion with and without midpalatal suture viscoelasticity using a representative skeletal geometry |
title_full | A comparative finite element analysis of maxillary expansion with and without midpalatal suture viscoelasticity using a representative skeletal geometry |
title_fullStr | A comparative finite element analysis of maxillary expansion with and without midpalatal suture viscoelasticity using a representative skeletal geometry |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparative finite element analysis of maxillary expansion with and without midpalatal suture viscoelasticity using a representative skeletal geometry |
title_short | A comparative finite element analysis of maxillary expansion with and without midpalatal suture viscoelasticity using a representative skeletal geometry |
title_sort | comparative finite element analysis of maxillary expansion with and without midpalatal suture viscoelasticity using a representative skeletal geometry |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6560028/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31186512 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44959-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fuhrerrs acomparativefiniteelementanalysisofmaxillaryexpansionwithandwithoutmidpalatalsutureviscoelasticityusingarepresentativeskeletalgeometry AT romanykdl acomparativefiniteelementanalysisofmaxillaryexpansionwithandwithoutmidpalatalsutureviscoelasticityusingarepresentativeskeletalgeometry AT careyjp acomparativefiniteelementanalysisofmaxillaryexpansionwithandwithoutmidpalatalsutureviscoelasticityusingarepresentativeskeletalgeometry AT fuhrerrs comparativefiniteelementanalysisofmaxillaryexpansionwithandwithoutmidpalatalsutureviscoelasticityusingarepresentativeskeletalgeometry AT romanykdl comparativefiniteelementanalysisofmaxillaryexpansionwithandwithoutmidpalatalsutureviscoelasticityusingarepresentativeskeletalgeometry AT careyjp comparativefiniteelementanalysisofmaxillaryexpansionwithandwithoutmidpalatalsutureviscoelasticityusingarepresentativeskeletalgeometry |