Cargando…

Comparison of pancreatic respiratory motion management with three abdominal corsets for particle radiation therapy: Case study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Abdominal organ motion seriously compromises the targeting accuracy for particle therapy in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. This study compares three different abdominal corsets regarding their ability to reduce pancreatic motion and their potential usability in part...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dolde, Kai, Schneider, Sergej, Stefanowicz, Sarah, Alimusaj, Merkur, Flügel, Beate, Saito, Nami, Troost, Esther G. C., Pfaffenberger, Asja, Hoffmann, Aswin L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6560237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31120639
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12613
_version_ 1783425931710300160
author Dolde, Kai
Schneider, Sergej
Stefanowicz, Sarah
Alimusaj, Merkur
Flügel, Beate
Saito, Nami
Troost, Esther G. C.
Pfaffenberger, Asja
Hoffmann, Aswin L.
author_facet Dolde, Kai
Schneider, Sergej
Stefanowicz, Sarah
Alimusaj, Merkur
Flügel, Beate
Saito, Nami
Troost, Esther G. C.
Pfaffenberger, Asja
Hoffmann, Aswin L.
author_sort Dolde, Kai
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Abdominal organ motion seriously compromises the targeting accuracy for particle therapy in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. This study compares three different abdominal corsets regarding their ability to reduce pancreatic motion and their potential usability in particle therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A patient‐individualized polyurethane (PU), a semi‐individualized polyethylene (PE), and a patient‐individualized three‐dimensional‐scan based polyethylene (3D‐PE) corset were manufactured for one healthy volunteer. Time‐resolved volumetric four‐dimensional‐magnetic resonance imaging (4D‐MRI) and single‐slice two‐dimensional (2D) cine‐MRI scans were acquired on two consecutive days to compare free‐breathing motion patterns with and without corsets. The corset material properties, such as thickness variance, material homogeneity in Hounsfield units (HU) on computed tomography (CT) scans, and manufacturing features were compared. The water equivalent ratio (WER) of corset material samples was measured using a multi‐layer ionization chamber for proton energies of 150 and 200 MeV. RESULTS: All corsets reduced the pancreatic motion on average by 9.6 mm in inferior–superior and by 3.2 mm in anterior‐posterior direction. With corset, the breathing frequency was approximately doubled and the day‐to‐day motion variations were reduced. The WER measurements showed an average value of 0.993 and 0.956 for the PE and 3DPE corset, respectively, and of 0.298 for the PU corset. The PE and 3DPE corsets showed a constant thickness of 2.8 ± 0.2 and 3.8 ± 0.2 mm, respectively and a homogeneous material composition with a standard deviation (SD) of 31 and 32 HU, respectively. The PU corset showed a variable thickness of 4.2 − 25.6 mm and a heterogeneous structure with air inclusions with an SD of 113 HU. CONCLUSION: Abdominal corsets may be effective devices to reduce pancreatic motion. For particle therapy, PE‐based corsets are preferred over PU‐based corset due to their material homogeneity and constant thickness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6560237
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65602372019-06-17 Comparison of pancreatic respiratory motion management with three abdominal corsets for particle radiation therapy: Case study Dolde, Kai Schneider, Sergej Stefanowicz, Sarah Alimusaj, Merkur Flügel, Beate Saito, Nami Troost, Esther G. C. Pfaffenberger, Asja Hoffmann, Aswin L. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Abdominal organ motion seriously compromises the targeting accuracy for particle therapy in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. This study compares three different abdominal corsets regarding their ability to reduce pancreatic motion and their potential usability in particle therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A patient‐individualized polyurethane (PU), a semi‐individualized polyethylene (PE), and a patient‐individualized three‐dimensional‐scan based polyethylene (3D‐PE) corset were manufactured for one healthy volunteer. Time‐resolved volumetric four‐dimensional‐magnetic resonance imaging (4D‐MRI) and single‐slice two‐dimensional (2D) cine‐MRI scans were acquired on two consecutive days to compare free‐breathing motion patterns with and without corsets. The corset material properties, such as thickness variance, material homogeneity in Hounsfield units (HU) on computed tomography (CT) scans, and manufacturing features were compared. The water equivalent ratio (WER) of corset material samples was measured using a multi‐layer ionization chamber for proton energies of 150 and 200 MeV. RESULTS: All corsets reduced the pancreatic motion on average by 9.6 mm in inferior–superior and by 3.2 mm in anterior‐posterior direction. With corset, the breathing frequency was approximately doubled and the day‐to‐day motion variations were reduced. The WER measurements showed an average value of 0.993 and 0.956 for the PE and 3DPE corset, respectively, and of 0.298 for the PU corset. The PE and 3DPE corsets showed a constant thickness of 2.8 ± 0.2 and 3.8 ± 0.2 mm, respectively and a homogeneous material composition with a standard deviation (SD) of 31 and 32 HU, respectively. The PU corset showed a variable thickness of 4.2 − 25.6 mm and a heterogeneous structure with air inclusions with an SD of 113 HU. CONCLUSION: Abdominal corsets may be effective devices to reduce pancreatic motion. For particle therapy, PE‐based corsets are preferred over PU‐based corset due to their material homogeneity and constant thickness. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6560237/ /pubmed/31120639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12613 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Dolde, Kai
Schneider, Sergej
Stefanowicz, Sarah
Alimusaj, Merkur
Flügel, Beate
Saito, Nami
Troost, Esther G. C.
Pfaffenberger, Asja
Hoffmann, Aswin L.
Comparison of pancreatic respiratory motion management with three abdominal corsets for particle radiation therapy: Case study
title Comparison of pancreatic respiratory motion management with three abdominal corsets for particle radiation therapy: Case study
title_full Comparison of pancreatic respiratory motion management with three abdominal corsets for particle radiation therapy: Case study
title_fullStr Comparison of pancreatic respiratory motion management with three abdominal corsets for particle radiation therapy: Case study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of pancreatic respiratory motion management with three abdominal corsets for particle radiation therapy: Case study
title_short Comparison of pancreatic respiratory motion management with three abdominal corsets for particle radiation therapy: Case study
title_sort comparison of pancreatic respiratory motion management with three abdominal corsets for particle radiation therapy: case study
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6560237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31120639
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12613
work_keys_str_mv AT doldekai comparisonofpancreaticrespiratorymotionmanagementwiththreeabdominalcorsetsforparticleradiationtherapycasestudy
AT schneidersergej comparisonofpancreaticrespiratorymotionmanagementwiththreeabdominalcorsetsforparticleradiationtherapycasestudy
AT stefanowiczsarah comparisonofpancreaticrespiratorymotionmanagementwiththreeabdominalcorsetsforparticleradiationtherapycasestudy
AT alimusajmerkur comparisonofpancreaticrespiratorymotionmanagementwiththreeabdominalcorsetsforparticleradiationtherapycasestudy
AT flugelbeate comparisonofpancreaticrespiratorymotionmanagementwiththreeabdominalcorsetsforparticleradiationtherapycasestudy
AT saitonami comparisonofpancreaticrespiratorymotionmanagementwiththreeabdominalcorsetsforparticleradiationtherapycasestudy
AT troostesthergc comparisonofpancreaticrespiratorymotionmanagementwiththreeabdominalcorsetsforparticleradiationtherapycasestudy
AT pfaffenbergerasja comparisonofpancreaticrespiratorymotionmanagementwiththreeabdominalcorsetsforparticleradiationtherapycasestudy
AT hoffmannaswinl comparisonofpancreaticrespiratorymotionmanagementwiththreeabdominalcorsetsforparticleradiationtherapycasestudy