Cargando…
Evaluation of setup and intrafraction motion for surface guided whole‐breast cancer radiotherapy
Surface Guided Radiotherapy (SGRT) is a relatively new technique for positioning patients and for monitoring patient movement during treatment. SGRT is completely non‐invasive since it uses visible light for determining the position of the patient surface. A reduction in daily imaging for patient se...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6560238/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31187538 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12599 |
_version_ | 1783425931938889728 |
---|---|
author | Hattel, Sandra Helene Andersen, Peter Andreas Wahlstedt, Isak Hannes Damkjær, Sidsel Saini, Arpit Thomsen, Jakob Borup |
author_facet | Hattel, Sandra Helene Andersen, Peter Andreas Wahlstedt, Isak Hannes Damkjær, Sidsel Saini, Arpit Thomsen, Jakob Borup |
author_sort | Hattel, Sandra Helene |
collection | PubMed |
description | Surface Guided Radiotherapy (SGRT) is a relatively new technique for positioning patients and for monitoring patient movement during treatment. SGRT is completely non‐invasive since it uses visible light for determining the position of the patient surface. A reduction in daily imaging for patient setup is possible if the accuracy of SGRT is comparable to imaging. It allows for monitoring of intrafraction motion and the radiation beam can be held beyond a certain threshold resulting in a more accurate irradiation. The purpose of this study was to investigate setup uncertainty and the intrafraction motion in non‐gated whole breast cancer radiotherapy treatment using an integrated implementation of AlignRT (OSMS) system as SGRT. In initial setup, SGRT was compared to three‐point setup using tattoos on the patient and orthogonal kV imaging. For the investigation of intrafraction motion, OSMS monitored the patient with six degrees of freedom during treatment. Using three‐point setup resulted in a setup root‐mean‐square error from the isocenter of 5.4 mm. This was improved to 4.2 mm using OSMS. For the translational directions, OSMS showed improvements in the lateral direction (P = 0.0009, Wilcoxon rank‐sum), but for the longitudinal direction and rotation it was not possible to show improvements (P = 0.96 and P = 0.46, respectively). The vertical direction proved more accurate for three‐point setup than OSMS (P = 0.000004). Intrafraction motion was very limited with a translational median of 1.1 mm from the isocenter. While OSMS showed marked improvements over laser and tattoo setup, the system did not prove accurate enough to replace the daily orthogonal kV images aligned to bony anatomy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6560238 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65602382019-06-17 Evaluation of setup and intrafraction motion for surface guided whole‐breast cancer radiotherapy Hattel, Sandra Helene Andersen, Peter Andreas Wahlstedt, Isak Hannes Damkjær, Sidsel Saini, Arpit Thomsen, Jakob Borup J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics Surface Guided Radiotherapy (SGRT) is a relatively new technique for positioning patients and for monitoring patient movement during treatment. SGRT is completely non‐invasive since it uses visible light for determining the position of the patient surface. A reduction in daily imaging for patient setup is possible if the accuracy of SGRT is comparable to imaging. It allows for monitoring of intrafraction motion and the radiation beam can be held beyond a certain threshold resulting in a more accurate irradiation. The purpose of this study was to investigate setup uncertainty and the intrafraction motion in non‐gated whole breast cancer radiotherapy treatment using an integrated implementation of AlignRT (OSMS) system as SGRT. In initial setup, SGRT was compared to three‐point setup using tattoos on the patient and orthogonal kV imaging. For the investigation of intrafraction motion, OSMS monitored the patient with six degrees of freedom during treatment. Using three‐point setup resulted in a setup root‐mean‐square error from the isocenter of 5.4 mm. This was improved to 4.2 mm using OSMS. For the translational directions, OSMS showed improvements in the lateral direction (P = 0.0009, Wilcoxon rank‐sum), but for the longitudinal direction and rotation it was not possible to show improvements (P = 0.96 and P = 0.46, respectively). The vertical direction proved more accurate for three‐point setup than OSMS (P = 0.000004). Intrafraction motion was very limited with a translational median of 1.1 mm from the isocenter. While OSMS showed marked improvements over laser and tattoo setup, the system did not prove accurate enough to replace the daily orthogonal kV images aligned to bony anatomy. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6560238/ /pubmed/31187538 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12599 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Hattel, Sandra Helene Andersen, Peter Andreas Wahlstedt, Isak Hannes Damkjær, Sidsel Saini, Arpit Thomsen, Jakob Borup Evaluation of setup and intrafraction motion for surface guided whole‐breast cancer radiotherapy |
title | Evaluation of setup and intrafraction motion for surface guided whole‐breast cancer radiotherapy |
title_full | Evaluation of setup and intrafraction motion for surface guided whole‐breast cancer radiotherapy |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of setup and intrafraction motion for surface guided whole‐breast cancer radiotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of setup and intrafraction motion for surface guided whole‐breast cancer radiotherapy |
title_short | Evaluation of setup and intrafraction motion for surface guided whole‐breast cancer radiotherapy |
title_sort | evaluation of setup and intrafraction motion for surface guided whole‐breast cancer radiotherapy |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6560238/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31187538 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12599 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hattelsandrahelene evaluationofsetupandintrafractionmotionforsurfaceguidedwholebreastcancerradiotherapy AT andersenpeterandreas evaluationofsetupandintrafractionmotionforsurfaceguidedwholebreastcancerradiotherapy AT wahlstedtisakhannes evaluationofsetupandintrafractionmotionforsurfaceguidedwholebreastcancerradiotherapy AT damkjærsidsel evaluationofsetupandintrafractionmotionforsurfaceguidedwholebreastcancerradiotherapy AT sainiarpit evaluationofsetupandintrafractionmotionforsurfaceguidedwholebreastcancerradiotherapy AT thomsenjakobborup evaluationofsetupandintrafractionmotionforsurfaceguidedwholebreastcancerradiotherapy |