Cargando…

Evaluation of setup and intrafraction motion for surface guided whole‐breast cancer radiotherapy

Surface Guided Radiotherapy (SGRT) is a relatively new technique for positioning patients and for monitoring patient movement during treatment. SGRT is completely non‐invasive since it uses visible light for determining the position of the patient surface. A reduction in daily imaging for patient se...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hattel, Sandra Helene, Andersen, Peter Andreas, Wahlstedt, Isak Hannes, Damkjær, Sidsel, Saini, Arpit, Thomsen, Jakob Borup
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6560238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31187538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12599
_version_ 1783425931938889728
author Hattel, Sandra Helene
Andersen, Peter Andreas
Wahlstedt, Isak Hannes
Damkjær, Sidsel
Saini, Arpit
Thomsen, Jakob Borup
author_facet Hattel, Sandra Helene
Andersen, Peter Andreas
Wahlstedt, Isak Hannes
Damkjær, Sidsel
Saini, Arpit
Thomsen, Jakob Borup
author_sort Hattel, Sandra Helene
collection PubMed
description Surface Guided Radiotherapy (SGRT) is a relatively new technique for positioning patients and for monitoring patient movement during treatment. SGRT is completely non‐invasive since it uses visible light for determining the position of the patient surface. A reduction in daily imaging for patient setup is possible if the accuracy of SGRT is comparable to imaging. It allows for monitoring of intrafraction motion and the radiation beam can be held beyond a certain threshold resulting in a more accurate irradiation. The purpose of this study was to investigate setup uncertainty and the intrafraction motion in non‐gated whole breast cancer radiotherapy treatment using an integrated implementation of AlignRT (OSMS) system as SGRT. In initial setup, SGRT was compared to three‐point setup using tattoos on the patient and orthogonal kV imaging. For the investigation of intrafraction motion, OSMS monitored the patient with six degrees of freedom during treatment. Using three‐point setup resulted in a setup root‐mean‐square error from the isocenter of 5.4 mm. This was improved to 4.2 mm using OSMS. For the translational directions, OSMS showed improvements in the lateral direction (P = 0.0009, Wilcoxon rank‐sum), but for the longitudinal direction and rotation it was not possible to show improvements (P = 0.96 and P = 0.46, respectively). The vertical direction proved more accurate for three‐point setup than OSMS (P = 0.000004). Intrafraction motion was very limited with a translational median of 1.1 mm from the isocenter. While OSMS showed marked improvements over laser and tattoo setup, the system did not prove accurate enough to replace the daily orthogonal kV images aligned to bony anatomy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6560238
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65602382019-06-17 Evaluation of setup and intrafraction motion for surface guided whole‐breast cancer radiotherapy Hattel, Sandra Helene Andersen, Peter Andreas Wahlstedt, Isak Hannes Damkjær, Sidsel Saini, Arpit Thomsen, Jakob Borup J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics Surface Guided Radiotherapy (SGRT) is a relatively new technique for positioning patients and for monitoring patient movement during treatment. SGRT is completely non‐invasive since it uses visible light for determining the position of the patient surface. A reduction in daily imaging for patient setup is possible if the accuracy of SGRT is comparable to imaging. It allows for monitoring of intrafraction motion and the radiation beam can be held beyond a certain threshold resulting in a more accurate irradiation. The purpose of this study was to investigate setup uncertainty and the intrafraction motion in non‐gated whole breast cancer radiotherapy treatment using an integrated implementation of AlignRT (OSMS) system as SGRT. In initial setup, SGRT was compared to three‐point setup using tattoos on the patient and orthogonal kV imaging. For the investigation of intrafraction motion, OSMS monitored the patient with six degrees of freedom during treatment. Using three‐point setup resulted in a setup root‐mean‐square error from the isocenter of 5.4 mm. This was improved to 4.2 mm using OSMS. For the translational directions, OSMS showed improvements in the lateral direction (P = 0.0009, Wilcoxon rank‐sum), but for the longitudinal direction and rotation it was not possible to show improvements (P = 0.96 and P = 0.46, respectively). The vertical direction proved more accurate for three‐point setup than OSMS (P = 0.000004). Intrafraction motion was very limited with a translational median of 1.1 mm from the isocenter. While OSMS showed marked improvements over laser and tattoo setup, the system did not prove accurate enough to replace the daily orthogonal kV images aligned to bony anatomy. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6560238/ /pubmed/31187538 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12599 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Hattel, Sandra Helene
Andersen, Peter Andreas
Wahlstedt, Isak Hannes
Damkjær, Sidsel
Saini, Arpit
Thomsen, Jakob Borup
Evaluation of setup and intrafraction motion for surface guided whole‐breast cancer radiotherapy
title Evaluation of setup and intrafraction motion for surface guided whole‐breast cancer radiotherapy
title_full Evaluation of setup and intrafraction motion for surface guided whole‐breast cancer radiotherapy
title_fullStr Evaluation of setup and intrafraction motion for surface guided whole‐breast cancer radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of setup and intrafraction motion for surface guided whole‐breast cancer radiotherapy
title_short Evaluation of setup and intrafraction motion for surface guided whole‐breast cancer radiotherapy
title_sort evaluation of setup and intrafraction motion for surface guided whole‐breast cancer radiotherapy
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6560238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31187538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12599
work_keys_str_mv AT hattelsandrahelene evaluationofsetupandintrafractionmotionforsurfaceguidedwholebreastcancerradiotherapy
AT andersenpeterandreas evaluationofsetupandintrafractionmotionforsurfaceguidedwholebreastcancerradiotherapy
AT wahlstedtisakhannes evaluationofsetupandintrafractionmotionforsurfaceguidedwholebreastcancerradiotherapy
AT damkjærsidsel evaluationofsetupandintrafractionmotionforsurfaceguidedwholebreastcancerradiotherapy
AT sainiarpit evaluationofsetupandintrafractionmotionforsurfaceguidedwholebreastcancerradiotherapy
AT thomsenjakobborup evaluationofsetupandintrafractionmotionforsurfaceguidedwholebreastcancerradiotherapy