Cargando…

Optical surface guidance for submillimeter monitoring of patient position during frameless stereotactic radiotherapy

PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of monitoring intrafraction motion during stereotactic radiotherapy with the optical surface monitoring system. Prior studies showing a false increase in the magnitude of translational offsets at non‐coplanar couch positions prompted the vendor to implement software...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Covington, Elizabeth L., Fiveash, John B., Wu, Xingen, Brezovich, Ivan, Willey, Christopher D, Riley, Kristen, Popple, Richard A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6560239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31095866
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12611
_version_ 1783425932167479296
author Covington, Elizabeth L.
Fiveash, John B.
Wu, Xingen
Brezovich, Ivan
Willey, Christopher D
Riley, Kristen
Popple, Richard A.
author_facet Covington, Elizabeth L.
Fiveash, John B.
Wu, Xingen
Brezovich, Ivan
Willey, Christopher D
Riley, Kristen
Popple, Richard A.
author_sort Covington, Elizabeth L.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of monitoring intrafraction motion during stereotactic radiotherapy with the optical surface monitoring system. Prior studies showing a false increase in the magnitude of translational offsets at non‐coplanar couch positions prompted the vendor to implement software changes. This study evaluated two software improvements intended to address false offsets. METHODS: The vendor implemented two software improvements: a volumetric (ACO) rather than planar calibration and, approximately 6 months later, an improved calibration workflow (CIB) designed to better compensate for thermal drift. Offsets relative to the reference position, obtained at table angle 0 following image‐guided setup, were recorded before beam‐on at each table position and at the end of treatment the table returned to 0° for patients receiving SRT. RESULTS: Prior to ACO, between ACO and CIB, and after CIB, 223, 155, and 436 fractions were observed respectively. The median magnitude of translational offsets at the end of treatment was similar for all three intervals: 0.29, 0.33, and 0.27 mm. Prior to ACO, the offset magnitude for non‐zero table positions had a median of 0.79 mm and was found to increase with increasing distance from isocenter to the anterior patient surface. After ACO, the median magnitude was 0.74 mm, but the dependence on surface‐to‐isocenter distance was eliminated. After CIB, the median magnitude for non‐zero table positions was reduced to 0.57 mm. CONCLUSION: Ongoing improvements in software and calibration procedures have decreased reporting of false offsets at non‐zero table angles. However, the median magnitude for non‐zero table angles is larger than that observed at the end of treatment, indicating that accuracy remains better when the table is not rotated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6560239
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65602392019-06-17 Optical surface guidance for submillimeter monitoring of patient position during frameless stereotactic radiotherapy Covington, Elizabeth L. Fiveash, John B. Wu, Xingen Brezovich, Ivan Willey, Christopher D Riley, Kristen Popple, Richard A. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of monitoring intrafraction motion during stereotactic radiotherapy with the optical surface monitoring system. Prior studies showing a false increase in the magnitude of translational offsets at non‐coplanar couch positions prompted the vendor to implement software changes. This study evaluated two software improvements intended to address false offsets. METHODS: The vendor implemented two software improvements: a volumetric (ACO) rather than planar calibration and, approximately 6 months later, an improved calibration workflow (CIB) designed to better compensate for thermal drift. Offsets relative to the reference position, obtained at table angle 0 following image‐guided setup, were recorded before beam‐on at each table position and at the end of treatment the table returned to 0° for patients receiving SRT. RESULTS: Prior to ACO, between ACO and CIB, and after CIB, 223, 155, and 436 fractions were observed respectively. The median magnitude of translational offsets at the end of treatment was similar for all three intervals: 0.29, 0.33, and 0.27 mm. Prior to ACO, the offset magnitude for non‐zero table positions had a median of 0.79 mm and was found to increase with increasing distance from isocenter to the anterior patient surface. After ACO, the median magnitude was 0.74 mm, but the dependence on surface‐to‐isocenter distance was eliminated. After CIB, the median magnitude for non‐zero table positions was reduced to 0.57 mm. CONCLUSION: Ongoing improvements in software and calibration procedures have decreased reporting of false offsets at non‐zero table angles. However, the median magnitude for non‐zero table angles is larger than that observed at the end of treatment, indicating that accuracy remains better when the table is not rotated. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6560239/ /pubmed/31095866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12611 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Covington, Elizabeth L.
Fiveash, John B.
Wu, Xingen
Brezovich, Ivan
Willey, Christopher D
Riley, Kristen
Popple, Richard A.
Optical surface guidance for submillimeter monitoring of patient position during frameless stereotactic radiotherapy
title Optical surface guidance for submillimeter monitoring of patient position during frameless stereotactic radiotherapy
title_full Optical surface guidance for submillimeter monitoring of patient position during frameless stereotactic radiotherapy
title_fullStr Optical surface guidance for submillimeter monitoring of patient position during frameless stereotactic radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Optical surface guidance for submillimeter monitoring of patient position during frameless stereotactic radiotherapy
title_short Optical surface guidance for submillimeter monitoring of patient position during frameless stereotactic radiotherapy
title_sort optical surface guidance for submillimeter monitoring of patient position during frameless stereotactic radiotherapy
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6560239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31095866
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12611
work_keys_str_mv AT covingtonelizabethl opticalsurfaceguidanceforsubmillimetermonitoringofpatientpositionduringframelessstereotacticradiotherapy
AT fiveashjohnb opticalsurfaceguidanceforsubmillimetermonitoringofpatientpositionduringframelessstereotacticradiotherapy
AT wuxingen opticalsurfaceguidanceforsubmillimetermonitoringofpatientpositionduringframelessstereotacticradiotherapy
AT brezovichivan opticalsurfaceguidanceforsubmillimetermonitoringofpatientpositionduringframelessstereotacticradiotherapy
AT willeychristopherd opticalsurfaceguidanceforsubmillimetermonitoringofpatientpositionduringframelessstereotacticradiotherapy
AT rileykristen opticalsurfaceguidanceforsubmillimetermonitoringofpatientpositionduringframelessstereotacticradiotherapy
AT popplericharda opticalsurfaceguidanceforsubmillimetermonitoringofpatientpositionduringframelessstereotacticradiotherapy